Abstract
Here we summarize results of the EU funded research project STAR concerning the suitability of different organism groups (fish, benthic invertebrates, macrophytes, diatoms) for monitoring European rivers. In a general way, the suitability of the organism groups is classified by monitoring type, stress type, river type, temporal scale and taxonomic resolution. For example, although all organism groups are affected by acidification, the relatively low species richness of fish and macrophytes in small mountain streams makes these two groups less suitable, and, hence, we argue that benthic diatoms and/or invertebrates may be considered as more robust indicators. Similar, lines of reasoning are given for a number of stressor and stream types.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brodin, Y. W., 1995. Acidification of Swedish freshwaters. In Henrikson, L. & Y. W. Brodin (eds), Liming of Acidified Surface Waters. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 63–76.
Johnson, R. K., D. Hering, M. T. Furse & R. T. Clarke, 2006a. Detection of ecological change using multiple organism groups: metrics and uncertainty. Hydrobiologia 566: 115–137.
Johnson, R. K., D. Hering, M. T. Furse & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 2006b. Indicators of ecological change: comparison of the early response of four organism groups to stress gradients. Hydrobiologia 566: 139–152.
Johnson, R. K. Hering, D. & M. T. Furse. Comparing the response of fish, macroinvertebrate, macrophyte and diatom assemblages in European streams to human-generated stress. Manuscript.
Stokes, P. M., E. T. Howell & G. Krantzberg, 1989. Effects of acidic precipitation on the biota of freshwater lakes. In Adriano, D. C. & A. H. Johnson (eds), Acidic Precipitation, 2: Biological and Ecological Effects. Springer-Verlag, New York: 273–304.
Stevenson, R. J., R. C. Bailey, M. C. Harrass, C. P. Hawkins, J. Alba-Tercedor, C. Couch, S. Dyer, F. A. Fulk, J. M. Harrington, C. T. Hunsaker & R. K. Johnson, 2004. Designing data collection for ecological assessments. In Barbour, M. T., S. B. Norton, H. R. Preston & K. W. Thornton (eds), Ecological Assessment of Aquatic Resources: Linking science to decision making. SETAC, Pensacola, Florida, USA, 55–84.
Springe, G., L. Sandin, A. Briede & A. Skuja, 2006. Biological quality metrics: their variability and appropriate scale for assessing streams. Hydrobiologia 566: 153–172.
USEPA, 2000. Stressor Identification Guidance Document. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, USA 228 pp, EPA-822-B-00-025.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hering, D., Johnson, R.K., Buffagni, A. (2006). Linking organism groups — major results and conclusions from the STAR project. In: Furse, M.T., Hering, D., Brabec, K., Buffagni, A., Sandin, L., Verdonschot, P.F.M. (eds) The Ecological Status of European Rivers: Evaluation and Intercalibration of Assessment Methods. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 188. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5160-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5493-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)