Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in correlations among Biological Elements and environmental parameters for different river types, analysed at two different spatial scales. A total of 82 sites, with at least good ecological status, were sampled across Europe, representing three core river types: Mountain rivers (26 sites); Lowland rivers (29 sites) and Mediterranean rivers (17 sites). At each site samples of macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fishes were taken during spring, following the methodological procedures established by the European STAR project. Environmental parameters were also recorded, based on a site protocol developed by the European projects AQEM and STAR. Environmental parameters were divided into three categories: aquatic habitats (mesohabitat scale), global features (reach scale) and obligatory typology parameters of Water Framework Directive (WFD) (geographical scale). Data were analysed to evaluate at the two scales, first, relationships among biological elements, and second, relationships between biological elements and environmental parameters. Within each river type, correlation matrices (Bray-Curtis distance) were calculated separately for each biological element and for each category of environmental parameters. All biological elements were correlated (p<0.01) to the larger spatial scale: macrophytes and macroinvertebrates are more correlated in lowland and mountain rivers, while in Mediterranean rivers, fish and macrophytes presented higher correlations. These links tend to be consistent for different spatial scales, except if they are weak on a larger regional scale, obligatory parameters of WFD were, in most cases, significantly correlated with the three biological communities (p<0.05). Results at different spatial scales supported the hierarchical theory of river formation. Reach and mesohabitat environmental parameters tend to explain aquatic communities at a lower spatial scale, while geographical parameters tend to explain the communities at a major spatial scale.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allouche, S., 2002. Nature and function of cover for riverine fish. Bulletin Francais de La Peche et la Pisciculture 356(66): 297–324.
AQEM consortium, 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM system. A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the Water Framework Directive. Version 1.0 February 2002.
Armitage, P. D., 1995. Faunal Community change in response to flow manipulation. In Harper, D. M. & J. D. Ferguson, (eds), The Ecological Basis of River Management. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 59–78.
Armitage, P. D. & C. E. Cannan, 2000. Annual changes in summer patterns of mesohabitat distribution and associated macroinvertebrate assemblages. Hydrological Processes 14: 3161–3179.
Armitage, P. D. & R. J. M. Gunn, 1996. Differential response of benthos to natural and anthropogenic disturbances in 3 lowland streams. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologia 81: 161–181.
Balci, P. & J. H. Kennedy, 2003. Comparison of chironomids and other macroinvertebrates associated with Myriophyllum spicatum and Heteranthera dubia. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 18: 235–247.
Beisel, J. N., P. Usseglio-Polaterra, S. Thomas & J. C. Moretou, 1998. Stream community structure in relation to spatial variation: the influence of mesohabitat characteristics. Hydrobiologia 389: 73–88.
Bernardo, J. M., M. Ilhéu, P. Matono & A.M. Costa, 2003. Interannual variation of fish assemblage structure in a Mediterranean river: implications of streamflow on the dominance of native or exotic species. River Research and Application 19: 1–12.
Bio, A. M. F., P. De Becker, E. De Bie, W. Huybrechts & M. Wassen, 2002. Prediction of plant species distribution in lowland river valleys in Belgium: modelling species response to site conditions. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 2189–2216.
Clark, K. R. & R. M. Warwick, 1980. Changes in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. Natural Environmental Council, UK.
Casas, J. J., 1997. Invertebrate assemblages associated with plant debris in a backwater of a mountain stream: natural leaf packs vs. debris dam. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 12: 39–49.
Cheruvelil, K. S., P. A. Soranno & R. D. Serbin, 2000. Macroinvertebrates associated with submerged macrophytes: sample size and power to detect effects. Hydrobiologia 441: 133–139.
Crook, D. A., A. I. Robertson, A. J. King & P. Humphries, 2001. The influence of spatial scale and habitat arrangement on diel patterns of habitat use by two lowland river fishes. Oecologia 129: 525–533.
Dahl, J. & L. A. Greenberg, 1998. Effects of fish predation and habitat type on stream benthic communities. Hydrobiologia 361: 67–76.
Furse, M., D. Hering, O. Moog, P. Verdonschot, R. K. Johnson, K. Brabec, K. Gritzalis, A. Buffagni, P. Pinto, N. Friberg, J. Murray-Bligh, J. Kokes, R. Alber, P. Usseglio-Polatera, P. Haase, R. Sweeting, B. Bis, K. Szoszkiewicz, H. Soszka, G. Springe, F. Sporka, I. Krno, 2006. The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches. Hydrobiologia 566: 3–29.
Ilhéu, M., 2004. Patterns of habitat use by freshwater fishes in Mediterranean rivers. PhD Thesis, University of Évora, Évora.
Jensen, M. E., P. Bourgeron, R. Everett & I. Goodman, 1996. Ecosystem management: a landscape ecology perspective. Water Research 32: 203–216.
Johnson, L. B., D. H. Breneman & C. Richards, 2003. Macroinvertebrate community structure and function associated with large wood in low gradient streams. River Research and Applications 19: 199–218.
Li, J. L., A. Herlihy, W. Gerth, P. Kaufmann, S. Gregory, S. Urquhart & D. P. Larsen, 2001. Variability in stream macroinvertebrates at multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 46: 1–87.
Petts, G. E., 2000. A perspective on the abiotic process sustaining the ecological integrity of running waters. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 15–27.
Reichard, M., P. Jurajda & M. Ondrackova, 2002. Interannual variability in seasonal dynamics and species composition of drifting young-of-the-year fishes in two European lowland rivers. Journal of Fish Biology 60: 87–101.
Reyjol, Y., A. Compin, A. Ibarra & P. Lim, 2003. Longitudinal diversity patterns in streams: comparing invertebrates and fish communities. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 157: 525–533.
Rosenfeld, J. S., 1997. The effect of large macroinvertebrate herbivores on sessile epibenthos in a mountain stream. Hydrobiologia 344: 75–79.
Smith, H., P. J. Wood & J. Gunn, 2003. The influence of habitat structure and flow permanence on invertebrate communities in karst spring systems. Hydrobiologia 510: 53–66.
Stanley, E. H., D. L. Buschman, A. J. Boulton, N. B. Grimm & S. G. Fisher, 1994. Invertebrate resistance and resilience to intermittency in a desert stream. American Midland Naturalist 131: 288–300.
Strayer, D. L., C. Lutz, H. M. Malcom, K. Munger & W. H. Shaw, 2003. Invertebrate communities associated with a native (Vallisneria americana) and an alien (Trapa natans) macrophyte in a large river. Freshwater Biology 48: 1938–1949.
Shoup, D.E., R. E. Carlson & R. T. Heath, 2003. Effects of predation risk and foraging return on the diel use of vegetated habitat by two size-classes of bluegills. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132: 590–597.
ter Braak, C. J. F. & P. Smilauer, 1998. ‘CANOCO Reference Manual and User’s Guide to Canoco for Windows’. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, 351 pp.
Tolonen, K. T., H. Hamalainen, I. J. Holopainen, K. Mikkonen & J. Karjalainen, 2003. Body size and substrate association of littoral insects in relation to vegetation structure. Hydrobiologia 499: 179–190.
Townsend, C. R., 1989. The patch dynamic concept of stream community ecology. Journal of North American Benthological Society 8: 36–50.
Townsend, C. R., A. G. Hidrew & J. Francis, 1983. Community structure in some southern English streams: the influence of physicochemical factors. Freshwater Biology 13: 521–544.
Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137.
Verdonschot, P. F., 2000. Integrated ecological assessment methods as a basis for sustainable catchment management. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 389–412.
Verdonschot, P. F. M., 2006. Evaluation of the use of Water Framework Directive typology descriptors, reference sites and spatial scale in macroinvertebrate stream typology. Hydrobiologia 566: 39–58.
Verdonschot, P. F. & R. C. Nijboer, 2004. Testing the European stream typology of the water framework directive for macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 516: 35–54.
Vieira, N. K. M., W. H. Clements, L. S. Guevara & B. F. Jacobs, 2004. Resistance and resilience of stream insect communities to repeated hydrologic disturbances after a wildfire. Freshwater Biology 49: 1243–1259.
Voelz, N. J. & J. V. McArthur, 2000. An exploration of factors influencing lotic insect species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1543–1570.
Wagner, F. H. & G. Bretschko, 2003. Riparian trees and flow paths between the hyporheic zone and groundwater in the Oberer Seebach, Austria. International Review of Hydrobiology 88: 129–138.
Ward, J. V., 1989. The four dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems. Journal of North American Benthological Society 8: 2–8.
Ward, J. V. & K. Tockner, 2001. Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshwater Biology 46: 807–819.
Warfe, D. M. & L. A. Barmuta, 2004. Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species. Oecologia 141: 171–178.
Weigel, B. M., L. Z. Wang, P. W. Rasmussen, J. T. Butcher, P. M. Stewart, T. P. Simon & M. J. Wiley, 2003. Relative influence of variables at multiple spatial scales on stream macroinvertebrates in the Northern Lakes and Forest ecoregion, USA. Freshwater Biology 48: 1440–1461.
Willis, S. C., K. O. Winemiller & H. Lopez-Fernandez, 2005. Habitat structural complexity and morphological diversity of fish assemblages in a Neotropical floodplain river. Oecologia 142: 284–295.
Wright, J. F., R. J. M. Gunn, J. M. Winder, R. Wiggers, K. Vowles, R. T. Clarke & I. Harris, 2002. A comparison of the macrophyte cover and macroinvertebrate fauna at three sites on the River Kennet in the mid 1970s and late 1990s. Science of the Total Environment 282: 121–142.
Wright, K. K. & J. L. Li, 2002. From continua to patches: examining stream community structure over large environmental gradients. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 1404–1417.
Zimmer, K. K. D., M. A. Hanson & M. G. Butler, 2003. Relationships among nutrients, phytoplankton, macrophytes, and fish in prairie wetlands. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60: 721–730.
Zrum, L. & B. J. Hann, 2002. Invertebrates associated with submersed macrophytes in a prairie wetland: effects of organophosphorus insecticide and inorganic nutrients. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 154: 413–445.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinto, P., Morais, M., Ilhéu, M., Sandin, L. (2006). Relationships among biological elements (macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and ichthyofauna) for different core river types across Europe at two different spatial scales. In: Furse, M.T., Hering, D., Brabec, K., Buffagni, A., Sandin, L., Verdonschot, P.F.M. (eds) The Ecological Status of European Rivers: Evaluation and Intercalibration of Assessment Methods. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 188. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5160-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5493-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)