Abstract
This study assesses the impact of errors in sorting and identifying macroinvertebrate samples collected and analysed using different protocols (e.g. STAR-AQEM, RIVPACS). The study is based on the auditing scheme implemented in the EU-funded project STAR and presents the first attempt at analysing the audit data. Data from 10 participating countries are analysed with regard to the impact of sorting and identification errors. These differences are measured in the form of gains and losses at each level of audit for 120 samples. Based on gains and losses to the primary results, qualitative binary taxa lists were deducted for each level of audit for a subset of 72 data sets. Between these taxa lists the taxonomic similarity and the impact of differences on selected metrics common to stream assessment were analysed. The results of our study indicate that in all methods used, a considerable amount of sorting and identification error could be detected. This total impact is reflected in most functional metrics. In some metrics indicative of taxonomic richness, the total impact of differences is not directly reflected in differences in metric scores. The results stress the importance of implementing quality control mechanisms in macroinvertebrate assessment schemes.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AQEM consortium, 2004. AQEMdip: AQEM data input program. Downloadable from http://www.eu-star.at.
Armitage, P. D., D. Moss, J. F. Wright & M. T. Furse, 1983. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Research 17: 333–347.
Biss, R., P. Kübler, I. Pinter & U. Braukmann, 2002. Leitbildbezogenes biozönotisches Bewertungsverfahren für Fließgewässer (aquatischer Bereich) in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ein erster Beitrag zur integrierten ökologischen Fließgewässerbewertung — Final report on CD-ROM. UBA Texts 62/02, Berlin.
Böhmer, J., C. Rawer-Jost, A. Zenker, C. Meier, C. Feld, R. Biss & D. Hering, 2004. Development of a multimetric invertebrate based assessment system for German rivers. Limnologica 34: 416–432.
Boulton, A. J. & P. S. Lake, 1992. The ecology of two streams in Victoria, Australia. III. Temporal changes in species composition. Freshwater Biology 27: 123–138.
Cao, Y., C. P. Hawkins & M. R. Vinson, 2003. Measuring and controlling data quality in biological assemblage surveys with special reference to stream benthic macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology 48:1898–1911.
Carter, J. L. & V. H. Resh, 2001. After site selection and before data analysis: sampling, sorting, and laboratory procedures used in stream benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring programs by USA state agencies. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20: 658–682.
Clarke, R. T., 2000. Uncertainty in estimates of river quality based on RIVPACS. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters: RIVPACS and Similar Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside 39–54.
Clarke, R. T., M. T. Furse, R. J. M. Gunn, J. M. Winder & J. F. Wright, 2002. Sampling variation in macroinvertebrate data and implications for river quality indices. Freshwater Biology 47: 1735–1751.
Clarke, R. T., J. Davy-Bowker, L. Sandin, N. Friberg, R. K. Johnson & B. Bis, 2006a. Estimates and comparisons of the effects of sampling variation using ‘national’ macroinvertebrate sampling protocols on the precision of metrics used to assess ecological status. Hydrobiologia 566: 477–503.
Clarke, R. T., A. Lorenz, L. Sandin, A. Schmidt-Kloiber, J. Strackbein, N. T. Kneebone & P. Haase, 2006b. Effects of sampling and sub-sampling variation using the STAR-AQEM sampling protocol on the precision of macroinvertebrate metrics. Hydrobiologia 566: 441–459.
Doberstein, C., J. Karr & L. Conquest, 2000. The effect of fixed-count subsampling on macroinvertebrate biomonitoring in small streams. Freshwater Biology 44: 355–371.
European Union, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC. Establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. European Commission PE-CONS 3639/1/100 Rev 1, Luxemburg.
Furse, M., D. Hering, O. Moog, P. Verdonschot, R. K. Johnson, K. Brabec, K. Gritzalis, A. Buffagni, P. Pinto, N. Friberg, J. Murray-Bligh, J. Kokes, R. Alber, P. Usseglio-Polatera, P. Haase, R. Sweeting, B. Bis, K. Szoszkiewicz, H. Soszka, G. Springe, F. Sporka & I. Krno, 2006. The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches. Hydrobiologia 566: 3–29.
Ganasan, V. & R. M. Hughes, 1998. Application of an index of biological integrity (IBI) to fish assemblages of the rivers Khan and Kshipra (Madhya Pradesh), India. Freshwater Biology 40: 367–383.
Haase, P., S. Lohse, S. Pauls, K. Schindehütte, A. Sundermann, P. Rolauffs & D. Hering, 2004a. Assessing streams in Germany with benthic invertebrates: development of a practical standardised protocol for macroinvertebrate sampling and sorting. Limnologica 34: 349–365.
Haase, P., S. Pauls, A. Sundermann & A. Zenker, 2004b. Testing different sorting techniques in macroinvertebrate samples from running waters. Limnologica 34: 366–378.
Hering, D., C. Meier, C. Rawer-Jost, R. Biss, C. Feld, A. Zenker, A. Sundermann, S. Lohse & J. Böhmer, 2004a. Assessing streams in Germany with benthic invertebrates: selection of candidate metrics. Limnologica 34: 398–415.
Hering, D., O. Moog, L. Sandin & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 2004b. Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia 516: 1–20.
Jaccard, P., 1901. Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 37: 547–579.
Lorenz, A., L. Kirchner & D. Hering, 2004. ‘Electronic subsampling’ of macrobenthic samples: how many individuals are needed for a valid assessment result? Hydrobiologia 516: 299–312.
Mann, H. B. & D. R. Whitney, 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18: 50–60.
McCune, B. & M. J. Mefford, 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 4.25. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.
McElravy, E. P., G. A. Lamberti & V. H. Resh, 1989. Year-to-year variation in the aquatic macroinvertebrate fauna of a northern Californian Stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8: 51–63.
Murray-Bligh, J. A. D., M. T. Furse, F. H. Jones, R. J. M. Gunn, R. A. Dines & J. F. Wright, 1997. Procedure for collecting and analysing macroinvertebrate samples for RIVPACS. Joint publication by the Institute of Freshwater Ecology and the Environment Agency, 162 pp.
Murray-Bligh, J., J. van der Molen & P. Verdonschot, 2006. STAR deliverable No. 7: Audit of Performance incorporating Results of the La Bresse sampling and analysis workshop. Unpublished report. www.eu-star.at.
National Water Council, 1981. River Quality: The 1980 Survey and Future Outlook. National Water Council, UK.
Ofenböck, T., O. Moog, J. Gerritsen & M. Barbour, 2004. A stressor specific multimetric approach for monitoring running waters in Austria using benthic macro-invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 516: 251–268.
Ostermiller, J. D. & C. P. Hawkins, 2004. Effects of sampling error on bioassessments of stream ecosystems: application to RIVPACS-type models. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23: 363–382.
Shannon, C. E. & W. Weaver, 1949. Mathematical Theory of Communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
Schweder, H., 1992. Neue Indices für die Bewertung des ökologischen Zustandes von Fließgewässern, abgeleitet aus der Makroinvertebraten-Ernährungstypologie. Limnologie Aktuell 3: 353–377.
Šporka F., H. E. Vlek, E. Bulánková & I. Krno, 2006. Influence of seasonal variation on bioassessment of streams using macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 566: 543–555.
StatSoft, Inc., 2002. STATISTICA for Windows (Software-System for Data Analysis) Version 6.1. www.statsoft.com.
Weatherby, N. S. & S. J. Ormerod, 1990. The constancy of univoltine assemblages in soft water streams: implications for the publication and detection of environmental change. Journal of Applied Ecology 27: 952–964.
Wiberg-Larsen, P., K. P. Brodersen, S. Birkholm, P. N. Grøn & J. Skriver, 2000. Species richness and assemblage structure of Trichoptera in Danish streams. Freshwater Biology 43: 633–647.
Wilcoxon, F., 1945. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. Biometrics 1: 80–83.
Vlek, H. E., F. Šporka & I. Krno, 2006. Influence of macroinvertebrate sample size on bioassessment of streams. Hydrobiologia 566: 523–542.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haase, P. et al. (2006). Assessing the impact of errors in sorting and identifying macroinvertebrate samples. In: Furse, M.T., Hering, D., Brabec, K., Buffagni, A., Sandin, L., Verdonschot, P.F.M. (eds) The Ecological Status of European Rivers: Evaluation and Intercalibration of Assessment Methods. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 188. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5160-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5493-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)