Abstract
The results of four macrophyte assessment methods (French Indice Biologique Macrophytique en Rivière, German Reference Index, British Mean Trophic Rank and Dutch Macrophyte Score) were compared, based on plant survey data of medium-sized lowland streams in Central Europe. To intercalibrate the good quality class boundaries two alternative methods were applied: direct comparison and the use of “common metrics”. While the French and British methods were highly related (R 2 > 0.75), the German RI showed less (0.20 < R 2 < 0.55) and the Dutch DMS least correlation (R 2<0.10) with other methods. Of 70 macrophyte metrics tested only Ellenberg_N was considerably related to three of the national assessment methods, thus representing a potential common metric for intercalibration. Comparison of quality class boundaries via regression analysis using both intercalibration approaches revealed major differences between classifications of the French, German and British methods, which are, in addition, related in a nonlinear way.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
NF T90-395, 2003. Water quality — Determination of the Macrophytes biological index for rivers (IBMR). Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR), Saint Denis La Plaine.
Birk, S. & D. Hering, 2006. Direct comparison of assessment methods using benthic macroinvertebrates: a contribution to the EU Water Framework Directive intercalibration exercise. Hydrobiologia 566: 401–415.
Birk, S. & D. Hering, 2002. Waterview Web-Database: a comprehensive review of European assessment methods for rivers. FBA News 20: 4.
Birk, S. & U. Schmedtje, 2005. Towards harmonisation of water quality classification in the Danube River Basin: overview of biological assessment methods for running waters. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Supplement “Large Rivers” 16: 171–196.
Buffagni, A., S. Erba, S. Birk, M. Cazzola, C. Feld, T. Ofenböck, J. Murray-Bligh, M. T. Furse, R. T. Clark, D. Hering, H. Soszka & W. v. d. Bund, 2005. Towards European Inter-calibration for the Water Framework Directive: Procedures and examples for different river types from the E.C. project STAR. 11th STAR deliverable. STAR Contract No: EVK1-CT 2001-00089. Quaderni Istituto di Ricerca sulle Acque 123: 1–468.
Buffagni, A., S. Erba, M. Cazzola, J. Murray-Bligh, H. Soszka & P. Genoni, 2006. The STAR common metrics approach to the WFD intercalibratin process: Full application for small, lowland rivers in three European countries. Hydrobiologia 566: 379–399.
Council of the European Communities, 1991. Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive 91/271/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities, L135/40-52, 30 May 1991, Brussels.
CIS WG 2.A Ecological Status (ECOSTAT), 2004. Guidance on the intercalibration process. Agreed version of WG 2.A Ecological Status meeting held 7–8 October 2004 in Ispra. Version 4.1. 14. October 2004. ECOSTAT, Ispra.
Elbersen, J. W. H., P. F. M. Verdonschot, B. Roels & J. G. Hartholt, 2003. Definitiestudie KaderRichtlijn Water (KRW). I. Typologie Nederlandse Oppervlaktewateren. Alterrarapport 669. ALTERRA, Wageningen.
Ellenberg, H., H. E. Weber, R. Düll, V. Wirth, W. Werner & D. Paulißen, 1992. Indicator Values of Plants in Central Europe. Erich Goltze, Göttingen.
European Commission, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC. Establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. European Commission PE-CONS 3639/1/100 Rev 1, Luxembourg.
Furse, M., D. Hering, O. Moog, P. Verdonschot, R. K. Johnson, K. Brabec, K. Gritzalis, A. Buffagni, P. Pinto, N. Friberg, J. Murray-Bligh, J. Kokes, R. Alber, P. Usseglio-Polatera, P. Haase, R. Sweeting, B. Bis, K. Szoszkiewicz, H. Soszka, G. Springe, F. Sporka & I. Krno, 2006. The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches. Hydrobiologia 566: 3–29.
Hering, D., R. K. Johnson, S. Kramm, S. Schmutz, K. Szoszkiewicz & P. F. M. Verdonschot, in prep. Assessment of European rivers with diatoms, macrophytes, invertebrates and fish: A comparative metric-based analysis.
Holmes, N. T. H., J. R. Newman, S. Chadd, K. J. Rouen, L. Saint & F. H. Dawson, 1999. Mean Trophic Rank: A User’s Manual. R & D Technical Report E38. Environment Agency, Bristol.
Holmes, N. T. H. & B. A. Whitton, 1975. Macrophytes of the river Tweed. Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 42: 369–381.
Janauer, G. A., 2001. Is what has been measured of any direct relevance to the success of the macrophyte in its particular environment? Journal of Limnology 60(Suppl.): 33–38.
Janauer, G. A., P. Hale & R. Sweeting (eds), 2003. Macrophyte inventory of the river Danube: A pilot study. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Supplement “Large Rivers” 147(1–2): 1–229.
Kelly, M. G. & B. A. Whitton, 1998. Biological monitoring of eutrophication in rivers. Hydrobiologia 384: 55–67.
Kohler, A., 1978. Methoden der Kartierung von Flora und Vegetation von Süßwasserbiotopen. Landschaft & Stadt 10: 73–85.
Korte, T. & K. Van de Weyer, 2005. Die Bewertung von Fließgewässern mit Makrophyten gemäß EU-WRRL — Ergebnisse des Vergleichs von zwei Bewertungsverfahren. Wasser und Abfall 9/2005: 46–49.
Leyssen, A., P. Adriaens, L. Denys, J. Packet, A. Schneiders, K. van Looy & L. Vanhecke, 2005. Toepassing van verschillende biologische beoordelingssystemen op Vlaamse potentiële interkalibratielocaties overeenkomstig de Europese Kaderrichtlijn Water — partim “Macrofyten”. Instituut voor Natuurbehoud in opdracht van VMM, Brussels.
Meilinger, P., S. Schneider & A. Melzer, 2005. The reference index method for the macrophyte-based assessment of rivers — a contribution for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive in Germany. International Review of Hydrobiology 90: 322–342.
Pall, K., V. Moser, J. Schaumburg, C. Schranz, & P. Meilinger, 2005. Ergebnisse zur Interkalibrierung der Fließgewässerbewertung mit Makrophyten (Option 3: Vergleich Deutschland-Österreich). Oral presentation held at the conference of the “Deutsche Gesellschaft für Limnologie” in Karlsruhe, 28 September 2005.
Pielou, E. C., 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology 13: 131–144.
Pot, R., 2005. QBWat — ecologische beoordeling van waterkwaliteit conform de Europese Kaderrichtlijn Water. Version 1.01.
SYSTAT Software Inc., 2002. TableCurve 2D — Version 5.01. SSI, Richmond CA.
Schaumburg, J., C. Schranz, J. Foerster, A. Gutowski, G. Hofmann, P. Meilinger, S. Schneider & U Schmedtje, 2004. Ecological classification of macrophytes and phytobenthos for rivers in Germany according to the Water Framework Directive. Limnologica 34: 283–301.
Schaumburg, J., U. Schmedtje, B. Köpf, C. Schranz, S. Schneider, P. Meilinger, D. Stelzer, G. Hofmann, A. Gutowski & J. Foerster, 2005. Makrophyten und Phytobenthos in Flüssen und Seen. Leitbildbezogenes Bewertungsverfahren zur Umsetzung der EG-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie. Informationsbericht Heft 1/05. Bayerisches Landesamt für Wasserwirtschaft, München.
Schneider, S., 2000. Entwicklung eines Makrophytenindex zur Trophieindikation in Fließgewässern. Shaker Verlag, Aachen.
Shannon, C. E. & W. Weaver, 1949. Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Simpson, E. H., 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688.
Sládeček, V., 1973. System of water quality from the biological point of view. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Beiheft Ergebnisse der Limnologie 7: 1–218.
Szoszkiewicz, K., T. Ferreira, T. Korte, A. Baattrup-Pedersen, J. Davy-Bowker & M. O’Hare, 2006. European river plant communities: the importance of organic pollution and the usefulness of existing macrophyte metrics. Hydrobiologia 566: 211–234.
Van de Weyer, K., 2003. Kartieranleitung zur Erfassung und Bewertung der aquatischen Makrophyten der Fließgewässer in Nordrhein-Westfalen gemäß den Vorgaben der EU-Wasser-Rahmenrichtlinie. LUA-Merkblä tter Nr. 39. Landesumweltamt (LUA) NRW, Düsseldorf.
Van den Berg, M. S., H. C. Coops, R. Pot, W. Altenburg, R. Nijboer, T. v. d. Broek, M. Fagel, G. Arts, R. Bijkerk, H. v. Dam, T. Ietswaart, J. v. d. Molen, K. Wolfstein, D. d. Jong & H. Hartholt, 2004. Achtergronddocument referenties en maatlatten waterflora. RIZA, Lelystad.
van der Molen, D. T., M. Beers, M. S. v. d. Berg, T. v. d. Broek, R. Buskens, H. C. Coops, H. v. Dam, G. Duursema, M. Fagel, T. Ietswaart, M. Klinge, R. A. E. Knoben, J. Kranenbarg, J. d. Leeuw, R. Noordhuis, R. C. Nijboer, R. Pot, P. F. M. Verdonschot & T. Vriese, 2004. Referenties en maatlatten voor rivieren ten behoeve van de Kaderrichtlijn Water — version July 2004. Alterra, Wageningen.
Wiegleb, G., 1988. Analysis of flora and vegetation in rivers: concepts and applications. In Symoens, J. J. (ed.) Vegetation of Inland Waters. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 311–340.
Wiegleb, G., 1991. Die Lebens-und Wuchsformen der makrophytischen Wasserpflanzen und deren Beziehung zur Ökologie, Verbreitung und Vergesellschaftung der Arten Tuexenia 11: 135–147.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Birk, S., Korte, T., Hering, D. (2006). Intercalibration of assessment methods for macrophytes in lowland streams: direct comparison and analysis of common metrics. In: Furse, M.T., Hering, D., Brabec, K., Buffagni, A., Sandin, L., Verdonschot, P.F.M. (eds) The Ecological Status of European Rivers: Evaluation and Intercalibration of Assessment Methods. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 188. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5160-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5493-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)