Abstract
The aim of the intercalibration exercise presently performed by the EU is to identify and resolve significant inconsistencies between the ecological quality classifications of EU Member States and the normative definitions of the EU Water Framework Directive. Based on benthic macroinvertebrate data of two European stream types (small siliceous mountain streams and medium-sized lowland streams in Central and Western Europe) we correlated the indices of 10 river quality assessment methods (ASPT, BMWP, DSFI, German Multimetric Index, Saprobic Indices) applied in Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Poland, Slovak Republic, Sweden and United Kingdom. National class boundaries were compared via regression analysis. Assessment methods of the same type (Saprobic Indices, BMWP/ASPT scores) showed best correlation results (R 2 > 0.7). The good quality status boundaries of the national methods deviated up to 25%; thus indicating the necessity to harmonize the national classification schemes. Prerequisites of the presented intercalibration approach are (1) a sufficiently large and consistent dataset representative of the respective common intercalibration types and (2) agreement on common type specific reference conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alba-Tercedor, J. & A. M. Pujante, 2000. Running-water bio-monitoring in Spain: opportunities for a predictive approach. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters — RIVPACS and Other Techniques. FBA, Ambleside, 207–216.
Armitage, P. D., D. Moss, J. F. Wright & M. T. Furse, 1983. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Research 17: 333–347.
Biggs, J., A. Corfield, D. Walker, M. Whitfield & P. Williams, 1996. A preliminary comparison of European methods of biological river water quality assessment. NRA Thames Region Operational Investigation. Environment Agency Technical Report No. 0I/T/001. National Rivers Authority Thames Region, Reading.
Birk, S. & D. Hering, 2002. Waterview web-database: a comprehensive review of European assessment methods for rivers. FBA News 20: 4.
Birk, S. & P. Rolauffs, 2003. A preliminary study comparing the results between the Austrian, Czech and German saprobic systems for the intercalibration of cross-border river basin districts. In Deutsche Gesellschaft für Limnologie (DGL) — Tagungsbericht (Köln). DGL, Werder, 74–79.
Birk, S. & U. Schmedtje, 2005. Towards harmonization of water quality classification in the Danube River Basin: overview of biological assessment methods for running waters. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Supplement Large Rivers 16: 171–196.
BMWP (Biological Monitoring Working Party)., 1978. Final Report of the Biological Monitoring Working Party: Assessment and presentation of the biological quality of rivers in Great Britain. Department of the Environmental Water Data Unit, London.
Böhmer, J., C. Rawer-Jost, A. Zenker, C. Meier, C. K. Feld, R. Biss & D. Hering, 2004. Assessing streams in Germany with benthic invertebrates: development of a multimetric invertebrate based assessment system. Limnologica 34: 416–432.
Brabec, K., S. Zahradkova, D. Nemejcova, P. Paril, J. Kokes & J. Jarkovsky, 2004. Assessment of organic pollution effect considering differences between lotic and lentic stream habitats. Hydrobiologia 516: 331–346.
Buffagni, A., S. Erba, M. Cazzola, J. Murray-Bligh, H. Soszka & P. Genoni, 2006. The STAR common metrics approach to the WFD intercalibration process: Full application for small, lowland rivers in three European countries. Hydrobiologia 566: 379–399.
CIS WG 2.A Ecological Status (ECOSTAT), 2004. Guidance on the intercalibration process. Agreed version of WG 2.A Ecological Status meeting held 7–8 October 2004 in Ispra. Version 4.1. 14. October 2004. ECOSTAT, Ispra.
CSN 757716., 1998. Water quality, biological analysis, determination of saprobic index. Czech Technical State Standard, Czech Standards Institute, Prague.
Feld, C. K., T. Ofenböck, O. Moog & D. Hering, in prep. Assessing hydromorphological degradation and organic pollution in European rivers — selection of suited metrics derived from benthic macroinvertebrates. Manuscript.
Friberg, N., L. Sandin, M. T. Furse, S. E. Larsen, R. T. Clark & P. Haase, 2006. Comparison of macroinvertebrate sampling methods in Europe. Hydrobiologia 566: 365–378.
Friedrich, G. & V. Herbst, 2004. Eine erneute Revision des Saprobiensystems — weshalb und wozu?. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica 32: 61–74.
Friedrich, G., E. Coring & B. Küchenhoff, 1995. Vergleich verschiedener europä ischer Untersuchungs-und Bewertungsmethoden für Fließgewässer. Landesumweltamt Nordrhein-Westfalen, Essen.
Furse, M., D. Hering, O. Moog, P. Verdonschot, R. K. Johnson, K. Brabec, K. Gritzalis, A. Buffagni, P. Pinto, N. Friberg, J. Murray-Bligh, J. Kokes, R. Alber, P. Usseglio-Polatera, P. Haase, R. Sweeting, B. Bis, K. Szoszkiewicz, H. Soszka, G. Springe, F. Sporka & I. Krno, 2006. The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches. Hydrobiologia 566: 3–29.
Ghetti, P. F. & G. Bonazzi, 1977. A comparison between various criteria for the interpretation of biological data in the analysis of the quality of running waters. Water Research 11: 819–831.
Ghetti, P. F. & G. Bonazzi, 1980. Biological water assessment methods: Torrente Parma, Torrente Stirone, Fiume Po. 3rd Technical Seminar. Final Report. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
Hering, D., O. Moog, L. Sandin & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 2004. Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia 516: 1–20.
Just, I., F. Schöll & T. Tittitzer, 1998. Versuch einer Harmonisierung nationaler Methoden zur Bewertung der Gewässergüte im Donauraum am Beispiel der Abwässer der Stadt Budapest. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.
Knoben, R. A. E., C. Roos & M. C. M. van Oirschot, 1995. Biological Assessment Methods for Watercourses. UN/ECE Task Force on Monitoring and Assessment, Lelystad.
Kownacki, A., H. Soszka, D. Kudelska & T. Fleituch, 2004. Bioassessment of Polish rivers based on macroinvertebrates. In Geller, W. et al. (eds), Proceedings of the International 11th Magdeburg Seminar on Waters in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessment, Protection, Management. 18–22 October 2004, UFZ Leipzig, 250–251.
Metcalfe-Smith, J. L., 1994. Biological water-quality assessment of rivers: Use of macroinvertebrate communities. In Calow, P. & G. E. Petts (eds), The Rivers Handbook — Hydrological and Ecological Principles. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 144–170.
Moog, O., A. Chovanec, J. Hinteregger & A. Römer, 1999. Richtlinie zur Bestimmung der saprobiologischen Gewässergüte von Fliessgewässern. Bundesministerium für Landund Forstwirtschaft, Wien.
Morpurgo, M., 1996. Confronto fra Indice Saprobico (Friedrich e DIN, 1990) e Indice Biotico Esteso (Ghetti e IRSA, 1995). Biologia Ambientale 14: 30–36.
National Rivers Authority, 1994. The Quality of Rivers and Canals in England and Wales (1990 to 1992) as Assessed by a New General Quality Assessment Scheme. HMSO, London.
Nixon, S. C., C. P. Mainstone, T. Moth Iversen, P. Kristensen, E. Jeppesen, N. Friberg, E. Papathanassiou, A. Jensen & F. Pedersen, 1996. The harmonized monitoring and classification of ecological quality of surface waters in the European Union. Final Report. European Commission Directorate General XI, Brussels.
Rico, E., A. Rallo, M. A. Sevillano & M. L. Arretxe, 1992. Comparison of several biological indices based on river macroinvertebrate benthic community for assessment of running water quality. Annales de Limnologie 28: 147–156.
Rolauffs, P., D. Hering, M. Sommerhäuser, S. Rödiger & S. Jähnig, 2003. Entwicklung eines leitbildorientierten Saprobienindexes für die biologische Fließgewässerbewertung. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.
Sandin, L. & D. Hering, 2004. Comparing macroinvertebrate indices to detect organic pollution across Europe: a contribution to the EC water framework directive intercalibration. Hydrobiologia 516: 55–68.
Schmidt-Kloiber, A., W. Graf, A. Lorenz & O. Moog, 2006. The AQEM/STAR taxalist — a pan-European macroinvertebrate ecological database and taxa inventory. Hydrobiologia 566: 325–342.
Skriver, J., N. Friberg & J. Kirkegaard, 2000. Biological assessment of running waters in Denmark: introduction of the Danish stream fauna index (DSFI). Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 27: 1822–1830.
STN (Slovenská Technická Norma) 83 0532-1 to 8, 1978/79. Biologický rozbor povrchovej vody. (Biological analysis of surface water quality.) Slovak Standardisation Institute, Bratislava.
Stubauer, I. & O. Moog, 2000. Taxonomic sufficiency versus need for information — comments based on Austrian experience in biological water quality monitoring. Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen 27: 1–5.
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 2000. Environmental quality criteria: lakes and watercourses. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm.
SYSTAT Software Inc., 2002. TableCurve 2D — Version 5.01. SSI, Richmond CA.
Tittizer, T., 1976. Comparative study of biological-ecological water assessment methods. Practical demonstration on the river Main. 2–6 June, 1975 (summary report). In Amavis, R.-J. (ed.) Principles and Methods for Determining Ecological Criteria on Hydrobiocoenosis: Proceedings of the European Scientific Colloquium Luxembourg, Nov. 1975. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 403–463.
Woodiwiss, F. S., 1978. Comparative study of biological-ecological water quality assessment methods. Second practical demonstration. Summary Report. Commission of the European Union, Brussels.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Birk, S., Hering, D. (2006). Direct comparison of assessment methods using benthic macroinvertebrates: a contribution to the EU Water Framework Directive intercalibration exercise. In: Furse, M.T., Hering, D., Brabec, K., Buffagni, A., Sandin, L., Verdonschot, P.F.M. (eds) The Ecological Status of European Rivers: Evaluation and Intercalibration of Assessment Methods. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 188. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5160-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5493-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)