Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe in detail the national macroinvertebrate sampling methods used and to compare them with a common standard, the STAR-AQEM sampling method. Information on national methods and field data were collected from 11 countries (Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Portugal, Sweden, and UK). The sampling included 22 stream types situated in 11 different Ecoregions. Within each country samples were taken in spring and one additional season (summer or autumn) using both the national method and the STAR-AQEM method. A single anthropogenic stressor was also defined for each stream type sampled within the project, with the three main stressor types being organic pollution (including eutrophication), toxic pollution and habitat degradation. In addition, not impacted reference sites were sampled in each country. A common set of metrics was calculated and compared between the methods. The majority of national methods employed had many features in common. Most of the 12 metrics analysed using the values derived from the STAR-AQEM method and the various national methods correlated significantly, and positively to each other. There was no clear pattern with respect to the differences between metric results obtained using STAR-AQEM and national methods. For some metrics, number of EPT-taxa and families, the value obtained was higher when using the majority of national methods when compared to the STAR-AQEM method. Variability in metric results between methods could not be explained from differences in sampling effort. Sorting in the field and sub-sampling appeared to affect e.g., number of taxa found negatively. The results of the present study supports that inter-calibration in Europe can be undertaken using samples collected with the existing national methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AFNOR, 1982. Essais des euax. Détermination de l’indice biologique global normalisé (IBGN) Association Francaise de Normalisation NF T 90-350 France.
AQEM, 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM system, version 1.0. www.aqem.de.
Armitage, P. D., D. Moss, J. F. Wright & M. T. Furse, 1983. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Research 17: 333–347.
Birk S. & D. Hering, 2003. Waterview Web-Database: a comprehensive review of European assessment methods for rivers. FBA News, 20 (winter 2002): 4.
Brown, A. V. & P. P. Brussock, 2001. Comparisons of benthic invertebrates between riffles and pools. Hydrobiologia 220: 99–108.
Buffagni, A., S. Erba, S. Birk, M. Cazzola, C. K. Feld T. Ofenböck, J. Murray-Bligh, M. T. Furse, R. Clarke, D. Hering, H. Soszka & W. van der Bund, 2005. Torwards European Inter-Calibration for the Water Framework Directive: Procedures and Examples for the Different River Types from the E.C. Project STAR. 11th STAR Deliverable. STAR contract no: EVK1-CT 2001-00089. Quaderni Instituto di Ricerca sulle Acque 123, IRSA, Rome, Italy 460 pp.
Clarke, R., 2000. Uncertainty in estimates of biological quality based on RIVPACS. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe, M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters: RIVPACS and Similar Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, UK, 39–54.
De Pauw, N. & G. Vanhooren, 1983. Method for biological quality assessment of watercourses in Belgium. Hydrobiologia 100: 153–168.
Dines, R. A. & J. A. D. Murray-Bligh, 2000. Quality assurance and RIVPACS. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters: RIVPACS and Similar Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, UK, 71–78.
Gabriels, W., P. L. M. Goethals & N. De Pauw, 2005. Implications of taxonomic modifications and alien species on biological water quality assessment as exemplified by the Belgian Biotic Index method. Hydrobiologia 542: 137–150.
Haase, P., S. Lohse, S. Pauls, K. Schindehütte, A. Sundermann, P. Rolauffs & D. Hering, 2004a. Assessing streams in Germany with benthic invertebrates: development of a practical standardised protocol for macroinvertebrate sampling and sorting. Limnologica 34: 349–365.
Haase, P., S. Pauls, A. Sundermann & A. Zenker, 2004b. Testing different sorting techniques in macroinvertebrate samples from running waters. Limnologica 34: 366–378.
Johnson, R. K., K. Aagaard, K. J. Aanes, N. Friberg, G. M. Gislason, H. Lax & L. Sandin, 2001. Macroinvertebrates. In Skriver, J. (ed.), Biological Monitoring in Nordic Rivers and Lakes. TemaNord 2001:513, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark: 43–52.
Metcalfe-Smith, J. L., 1996. Biological water-quality assessment of rivers: use of macroinvertebrate communities. In Petts, G. & P. Calow (eds), River Restoration. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 17–59.
Olsen, H.-M. & N. Friberg, 1999. Biological stream assessment in Denmark: The importance of physical factors. In Friberg, N. & J. D. Carl (eds), Proceedings from the Second Meeting of the Nordic Benthological Society, Silkeborg November 1997. National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark.
Schweder, H., 1992. Neue indices für die Bewertung des ökologischen Zustandes von Fliessgewässern, abgeleitet aus der Makroinvertebraten-Ernährungstypologie. Limnologie Aktuell 3: 353–377.
Shannon, C. E. & W. Weaver, 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, U.S.
Sokal, R. R. & J. R. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry. Freeman and Company, New York, U.S.
Vinson, M. R. & C. P. Hawkins, 1996. Effects of sampling area and subsampling procedure on comparisons of taxa richness among streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 392–399.
Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), 2000. Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters: RIVPACS and Similar Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, UK.
Zelinka, M. & P. Marvan, 1961. Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fließender Gewässer. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie 57: 389–407.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Friberg, N., Sandin, L., Furse, M.T., Larsen, S.E., Clarke, R.T., Haase, P. (2006). Comparison of macroinvertebrate sampling methods in Europe. In: Furse, M.T., Hering, D., Brabec, K., Buffagni, A., Sandin, L., Verdonschot, P.F.M. (eds) The Ecological Status of European Rivers: Evaluation and Intercalibration of Assessment Methods. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 188. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5160-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5493-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)