Abstract
Despite the widespread application of periphytic diatoms to water quality assessment at a regional level, there is no standard European sampling protocol or associated assessment metrics. Furthermore, relatively little is known about the uncertainty in the results of such assessments. One of the objectives of the European project for the Standardisation of River Classifications (STAR) is to improve and standardise diatom assessment methods. An extensive diatom ring test, together with an audit of the project results, provided a better understanding and quantification of the uncertainty in quality assessment of running waters using diatoms. The variation in multimetric analysis shows that the choice of site and substrate for sampling, the inter-operator differences in diatom taxonomy and the counting techniques are the primary sources of uncertainty. To some extent, this variation also reveals the robustness of specific metrics in relation to the sources of uncertainty. Of the three most common substrate types tested (stone, macrophyte and sediment), macrophytes emerge as the most preferred substrate for diatom sampling when performing multimetric water quality assessment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Battarbee, R. W., R. J. Flower, S. Juggins, S. T. Patrick & A. C. Stevenson, 1997. The relationship between diatoms and surface water quality in the Hoylandet area of Nord-Trondelag, Norway. Hydrobiologia 348: 69–80.
Cazoubon, A., 1996. Algal epiphytes, a methodological problem in river monitoring. In Whitton, B. A. & E. Rott (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers II. Innsbruck, Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck, 47–50.
Coring, E., 1999. Situation and developments of algal (diatom)-based techniques for monitoring rivers in Germany. In Prygiel, J., B.A. Whitton & J. Bukowska (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers III. Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai, 122–127.
Coste, M., 1987. Etude des méthods biologique quantitatives d’appréciation de la qualité des eaux. Rapport Division Qualiteé des Eaux Lyon. Agence de l’Eau Rhône, 28.
Dell’Uomo, A., 1996. Assessment of water quality of an Appanine river as a pilot study for diatom-based monitoring of Italian water courses. In Whitton, B. A. & E. Rott (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers II. Innsbruck, Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck, 64–72.
Denys, L., 1991a. A check-list of the diatoms in the holocene deposits of the Western Belgian coastal plain with a survey of their apparent ecological requirements. I. Introduction, ecological code and complete list. Ministère des Affaires Economiques — Service Géologique de Belgique.
Denys, L., 1991b. A check-list of the diatoms in the holocene deposits of the Western Belgian coastal plain with a survey of their apparent ecological requirements. II. Centrales. Ministère des Affaires Economiques — Service Géologique de Belgique.
Descy, J.-P., 1979. A new approach to water quality estimation using diatoms. Nova Hedwigia 64: 305–323.
Descy, J.-P. & M. Coste, 1991. A test of methods for assessing water quality based on diatoms. Verhandlung Internationale Vereingung de Limnologie 24: 2112–2116.
Ector, L. & F. Rimet, 2005. Using bioindicators to assess rivers in Europe: an overview. In Lek, S., M. Scardi, P. F. M. Verdonschot, J.-P. Descy & Y.-S. Park (eds), Modelling Community Structure in Freshwater Ecosystems. Springer: 7–19.
Furse, M., D. Hering, O. Moog, P. Verdonschot, R. K. Johnson, K. Barbec, K. Gritzalis, A. Buffagni, P. Pinto, N. Friberg, J. Murray-Bligh, J. Kokes, R. Alber, P. Usseglio-Polatera, P. Haase, R. Sweeting, B. Bis, K. Szoszkiewicz, H. Soszka, G. Springe, F. Sporka & I. Krno, 2006. The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches. Hydrobiologia 566: 3–29.
Gomez, N., 1998. Use of epipelic diatoms for evaluation of water quality in the Matanza-Riachuelo (Argentina), a pampean plain river. Water Research 32: 2029–2034.
Gomez, N. & M. Licursi, 2001. The Pampean Diatom Index (IDP) for assessment of rivers and streams in Argentina. Aquatic Ecology 35: 173–181.
Kelly, M. G., 1998. Use of the trophic diatom index to monitor eutrophication in rivers. Water Research 32: 236–242.
Kelly, M. G., A. Cazaubon, E. Coring, A. Dell’Uomo, L. Ector, B. Goldsmith, H. Guasch, J. Hürlimann, A. Jarlman, B. Kawecka, J. Kwandrans, R. Laugaste, E.-A. Lindstrøm, M. Leitao, P. Zarvan, J. Padisák, E. Pipp, J. Prygiel, E. Rott, S. Sabater, H. van Dam & J. Vizinet, 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. Journal of Applied Phycology 10: 215–224.
Kelly, M. G. & B. A. Whitton, 1995. The Trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology 7: 433–444.
Leclercq, L. & B. Maquet, 1987. Deux noveaux metrics diatomique et the qualite chimique des eaux courantes. Comparison avec differents metrics existants. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 28: 303–310.
Lecointe, C., M. Coste & J. Prygiel, 2003. Omnidia 3.2. Diatom Index Software Including Diatom Database with Taxonomic Names, References and Codes of 11645 Diatom Taxa.
MVSP: Multi-Variate Statistical Package, 1986–2001. Kovach Computing Services, Pentraeth, Wales, UK.
Patterson, H. D. & R. Thompson, 1971. Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545–554.
Prygiel, J. & M. Coste, 1999. Progress in the use of diatoms for monitoring rivers in France. In Prygiel, J., B. A. Whitton & J. Bukowska (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers III. Douai, Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie: 165–179.
Rolland, T., S. Fayolle, A. Cazaubon & S. Pagnetti, 1997. Methodical approach to distribution of epilithic and drifting algae communities in a French subalpine river: inferences on water quality assessment. Aquatic Sciences 59: 57–73.
Rott, E., H. C. Duthie & E. Pipp, 1998. Monitoring organic pollution and eutrophication in the Grand River, Ontario, by means of diatoms. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 1443–1453.
Rott, E., P. Pfister, H. Van Dam, E. Pipp, K. Pall, N. Binder & K. Ortler, 1999. Indikationslisten für aufwuchsalgen. Wien. Bundesministerium für Land-und Forstwirtschaft 248.
Sládeček, V., 1986. Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica 14(5): 555–566.
Snoeijs, P. J. M., 1991. Monitoring pollution effects by diatom community composition: a comparison of sampling methods. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 121: 497–510.
Steinberg, C. & S. Schiefele, 1988. Biological indication of trophy and pollution of running waters. Zeitschrift für Wasser-und Abwasser-Forschung 21: 227–234.
Stevenson, R. J. & S. Hashim, 1989. Variation in diatom community structure among habitats in sandy streams. Journal of Phycology 25: 678–686.
Ter Braak, C. J. F., 1988. CANOCO — A FORTRAN Program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal component analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1). Report LWA-88-02. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen.
Ter Braak, C. J. F. & P. Ŝmilauer, 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and Users Guide to Canoco for Windows. Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Centre for Biometry, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Van Dam, H., 1997. Partial recovery of moorland pools from acidification: indications by chemistry and diatoms. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 30: 203–218.
Verdonschot, P. F. M. & C. J. F. Ter Braak, 1994. An experimental manipulation of oligochaete communities in mesocosms treated with chlorpyrifos or nutrient additions: multivariate analyses with Monte Carlo permutation tests. Hydrobiologia 278: 251–266.
Winter, J. G. & H. C. Duthie, 2000. Stream epilithic, epipelic and epiphytic diatoms: habitat fidelity and use in biomonitoring. Aquatic Ecology 34: 345–353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Besse-Lototskaya, A., Verdonschot, P.F.M., Sinkeldam, J.A. (2006). Uncertainty in diatom assessment: Sampling, identification and counting variation. In: Furse, M.T., Hering, D., Brabec, K., Buffagni, A., Sandin, L., Verdonschot, P.F.M. (eds) The Ecological Status of European Rivers: Evaluation and Intercalibration of Assessment Methods. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 188. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5160-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5493-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)