The paper builds on the basically Humean idea that A is a cause of B iff A and B both occur, A precedes B, and A raises the metaphysical or epistemic status of B given the obtaining circumstances. After introducing the formal framework in section 3.2, section 3.3 argues that in pursuit of a theory of deterministic causation this ‘status raising’ is best explicated not in regularity or counterfactual terms, but in terms of ranking functions. On this basis, section 3.4 constructs a rigorous theory of direct and indirect causation that, as section 3.5 argues, successfully deals with cases of symmetric overdetermination and of preemption by cutting and by trumping. Section 3.6 finally indicates how the account’s profound epistemic relativization induced by ranking theory can be undone.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). Causation: An Alternative. In: Spohn, W. (eds) Causation, Coherence, and Concepts. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 256. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5474-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5474-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5473-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5474-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)