Invasibility of four plant communities in the Llobregat delta (Catalonia, NE of Spain) in relation to their historical stability

  • Joan Pino
  • Josep Maria Seguí
  • Nora Alvarez
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 190)


Presence and cover of alien plants were analysed in relation to recent naturalness changes (1956–1999) in the Llobregat delta by means of GIS techniques and field surveys. Two land cover maps of 1956 and 1999 were generated by photo-interpretation of orthoimages and they were then reclassified into naturalness classes, defined as the degree of preservation of the pristine state. The resulting naturalness maps were combined in order to obtain a naturalness change map, which was used to design field sampling in four pristine communities: reedbeds, rushbeds, halophilous scrubs and fixed dune communities. Two study areas were selected for each community and three stability regimes (stable, semi-stable and non-stable) obtained from the naturalness change map. Five vegetation inventories were performed on average in each of these areas using the classical sigmatist method. Results showed a negative relationship between stability and invasibility, with several variations between communities. No alien species were found in stable areas of all communities. Alien species number, species percentage and relative cover increased from semi-stable to non-stable regimes in reedbeds and dune communities, indicating that reversion towards the climax reduces opportunities for alien establishment in these communities. In contrast, halophilous habitats such as rushbeds and scrubs did not exhibit significant differences between semi-stable and non-stable plots, probably because saline stress makes their invasion by alien plants difficult, even under disturbance.

Key words

landscape history alien species coastal habitats Llobregat delta 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alpert, P., E. Bone & C. Holzapfel, 2000. Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 3: 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolòs, A. & O. Bolòs, 1950. La vegetación de las comarcas barcelonesas. Instituto Español de Estudios Mediterráneos, Barcelona, 350 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Casasayas, T., 1990. Widespread adventive plants in Catalonia. In di Castri, F., A. J. Hansen & M. Debussche (eds), Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Kluwer academic Publishers, Dodretch, 85–104.Google Scholar
  4. di Castri, F., 1990. On invading species and invaded ecosystems: the interplay of historical chance and biological necessity. In di Castri, F., A. J. Hansen & M. Debussche (eds), Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Kluwer academic Publishers, Dodretch, 3–16.Google Scholar
  5. Ewel, J. J., 1986. Invasibility: lessons from South Florida. In Mooney, H. A. & J. A. Drake (eds), Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer-Verlag, New York, 214–230.Google Scholar
  6. Heger, T., 2001. A model for interpreting the process of invasion: crucial situations favouring special characteristics of invasive spacies. In Brundu, G., J. Brock, I. Camarda, L. Child & M. Wade (eds), Plant Invasions: Species Ecology and Ecosystem Management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 3–9.Google Scholar
  7. Hobbs, R. J., 2000. Land-use changes and invasions. In Mooney H. A. & R. J. Hobbs (eds), Invasive Species in a Changing World. Island Press, Washington, DC, 55–64.Google Scholar
  8. Hobbs, R. J. & L. F Huenneke, 1992. Disturbance, diversity and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6: 324–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones, D. T. & R. F. Doren, 1997. The distribution, biology and control of Schinus terebinthifolius in southern Florida. With special reference to Everglades National Park. In Brock, J. H., M. Wade, P. Pyšek & D. Green (eds), Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Blackhuys publishers, Leiden, 81–93.Google Scholar
  10. Lodge, D. M., 1993. Species invasions and deletions. In Kareiva, P. M., J. G. Kingsolver & R. B. Honey (eds), Biotic Interactions and Global Change. Sunderland, Massachussets, 367–387.Google Scholar
  11. Olenin, S. & E. Leppänoski, 1999. Non-native animals in the Baltic Sea: alteration of benthic habitats in coastal inlets and lagoons. Hydrobiologia 393: 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pyšek, P. & K. Prach, 1993. Plant invasion and the role of riparian habitats: a comparison of four species alien to central Europe. Journal of Biogeography 20: 413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rauchich, J. & R. J. Reader, 1999. An experimental study of wetland invisibility by purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 1499–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rubio-Casal, A. E., J. M. Castillo, C. J. Luque & M. E. Figuero, 2001. Nucleation and facilitation in salt pans in Mediterranean salt marshes. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 761–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vitousek, P. M., H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco & J. M. Melillo, 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277: 494–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan Pino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Josep Maria Seguí
    • 3
  • Nora Alvarez
    • 4
  1. 1.Departament de Biologia VegetalUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF)Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain
  3. 3.Méndez Núñez 1BarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Department of BiologyUniversity of Puerto RicoSan JuaUSA

Personalised recommendations