Skip to main content

Relationships between macrophytic vegetation and physical features of river habitats: the need for a morphological approach

  • Chapter
Macrophytes in Aquatic Ecosystems: From Biology to Management

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 190))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study the relationships between the physical features of rivers and the distribution of macrophyte vegetation. Field work was undertaken at 207 stations along the Scorff River and its tributaries, a salmon river system in southern Brittany (western France). The physical features were considered using a principal component analysis (PCA). Stepwise multiple regression models made it possible to assess their relationships with the botanical data. The first five axes of the physical PCA (used as explicative variables) were initially linked to the most frequently surveyed species, then to their ecomorphological types, and, finally to Arber’s (1920. Water Plants. A Study of Aquatic Angiosperms. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 414 pp) morphological classification. It was concluded that plant morphology was closely related to these environmental factors. This could contribute to the development of predictive models for plant distribution and could increase the knowledge of reference vegetation related to bioindication systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ali, M. M., K. J. Murphy & V. J. Aberneth, 1999. Macrophyte functional variables v. species assemblages as predictors of trophic status in flowing waters. Hydrobiologia 415: 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arber, A., 1920. Water Plants. A Study of Aquatic Angiosperms. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 414 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernez, I., H. Daniel & J. Haury, 2001. Etude des variations des communautés végétales aquatiques sous l’effet de perturbations anthropiques en rivière régulée. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 357/358: 169–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornette, G., C. Henry, M. H. Barrat & C. Amoros, 1994. Theorical habitat templet, species traits and species richness: aquatic macrophytes in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain. Freshwatater Biology 31: 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, R. W., 1933. Studies on the ecology of rivers I. On the distribution of macrophytic vegetation in the rivers of Britain. Journal of Ecology 21: 58–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canfield, D. E. J. & M. V. Hoyer, 1988. Influence of nutrient enrichment and light availability on the abundance of aquatic macrophytes in Florida streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45: 1467–1472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbiener, R., M. Trémolières, J. L. Mercier & A. Ortscheit, 1990. Aquatic macrophyte communities as bioindicators of eutrophication in calcareous oligosaprobe stream waters (Upper Rhine plain, Alsace). Vegetatio 86: 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, P. A., 1987. Light and nutrients in the control of aquatic plant community structure II. In situ observations. Journal of Ecology 75: 621–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CISIA, 1999. SPAD version4-Logiciel d’Analyses des Donné es. Montreuil (France).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, H. & J. Haury, 1995. Effects of fish farm pollution on phytocenoses in an acidic river (the River Scorff, South Brittany, France). Acta Botanica Gallica 142: 639–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, H. & J. Haury, 1996a. Ecologie des macrophytes aquatiques d’une rivière armoricaine (Le Scorff, Bretagne Sud, France), Application à la bioindication. Ecologie 27: 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, H. & J. Haury, 1996b. Les macrophytes aquatiques: une métrique de l’environnement en rivière. Cybium 20(3 sup): 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, F. H., P. J. Raven & M. J. Gravelle, 1999. Distribution of the morphological groups of aquatic plants for rivers in the U.K. Hydrobiologia 415: 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demars, B. O. L. & D. M Harper, 1998. The aquatic macrophytes of an English lowland river system: assessing response to nutrient enrichment. Hydrobiologia 384: 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, C. & G. Van Der Velde, 1988. Structural aspects of aquatic plant communities. In Symoens, J. J. (ed.), Vegetation of Inland Waters. Handbook of Vegetation Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 113–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. M., 1987. River Plants of Western Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 512 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haury, J., M. C. Peltre, S. Muller, M. Trémolières, J. Barbe, A. Dutartre & M Guerlesquin, 1996. Des indices macrophytiques pour estimer la qualitédes cours d’eau français: premières propositions. Ecologie 27: 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, N. T. H. & B. A. Whitton, 1977. The macrophytic vegetation of the River Tees in 1975: observed and predicted changes. Freshwatater Biology 7: 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, N. T. H., J. R. Newman, J. R. Chadd, K. J. Rouen, L. Saint & F. H. Dawson, 1999. Mean Trophic Rank: a user’s manual. Research & Development, Technical report E138. Environment Agency, Bristol, 134 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. G. & B. A. Whitton, 1998. Biological monitoring of eutrophication in rivers. Hydrobiologia 384: 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolher, A., 1971. Zur Okologie submerser Gefäss-Makrohyten in Fliessgewässern. Berichte Der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft Bd. 84: 713–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkirinta, U., 1978. Ein neues komorphologisches Lebensformen-System der aquatischen Makrophyten. Phytocoenologia 4: 446–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtaugh, P. A., 1996. The statistical evaluation of ecological indicators. Ecological Applications 6: 132–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raunkiaer, C., 1905. Types biologiques pour la géographie botanique. Bulletin Acadamy of Royal Science (Denmark) 5: 347–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. J. E., 1978. The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 706 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. J. E., 1990. The liverworts of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 362 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trémolières, M., R. Carbiener, A. Ortscheit & J. P. Klein, 1994. Changes in aquatic vegetation in Rhine floodplain streams in Alsace in relation to disturbance. Journal of Vegetation Science 5: 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, T. G., V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters & D. H. Webb, 1968–1993. Flora Europea Vol. 1–5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L., 1997. SYSTAT 7.0. SPSS, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willby, N. J., V. J. Abernethy & B. O. L. Demars, 2000. Attribute-based classification of European hydrophytes and its relationship to habitat utilization. Freshwatater Biology 43: 43–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daniel, H., Bernez, I., Haury, J. (2006). Relationships between macrophytic vegetation and physical features of river habitats: the need for a morphological approach. In: Caffrey, J.M., Dutartre, A., Haury, J., Murphy, K.J., Wade, P.M. (eds) Macrophytes in Aquatic Ecosystems: From Biology to Management. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 190. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5390-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics