Thermal Decomposition of Composites in Fire

Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 143)

Abstract

The behaviour of composite materials in fire is governed largely by the chemical processes involved in the thermal decomposition of the polymer matrix and, if present, the organic fibres. This chapter provides a description of these decomposition mechanisms. The description is kept at a general level, and the reader can refer to the many excellent textbooks on polymer decomposition for more information [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Following this, the decomposition behaviour of polymer systems used in composites is described. A great number of different polymers can be used in composites, and it would be too exhaustive to describe the decomposition of each type. Instead, the chemical nature and decomposition behaviour of the thermoset polymers and thermoplastics most commonly used in composites are reviewed. This will include the thermosets: polyesters, vinyl esters, epoxies and phenolics, and the thermoplastics: polypropylene (PP), poly ether ether ketone (PEEK) and polyphenylene sulphide (PPS). The thermal decomposition of the organic fibres most often used in composites; namely aramid and UHMW polyethylene fibres, are also discussed. The decomposition of other types of organic fibres that are presently used in niche applications are not reviewed, such as nylon 6,6 or PBO (Zylon®), or fibres that are still under development, such as M5 (poly(2,6-diimidazo[4,5-b:4′,5′-e]pyridinylene-1,4-(2,5-dihydroxy)phenylene)). Finally, the physical aspects of degradation of composites in fire are described, including char formation, delamination damage and matrix cracking.

Keywords

Phenol Welding Polyethylene Glycol Carbon Monoxide 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S.L. Madorsky. Thermal Degradation of Polymers, Robert E. Kreiger, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Kelen. Polymer Degradation, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.L. Hawkins. Polymer Degradation and Stabilization, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1984.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Grassie and G. Scott. Polymer Degradation and Stabilisation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.F. Cullis and M.M. Hirschler. The Combustion of Organic Polymers, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1981.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Pauling. The Nature of the Chemical Bond, Cornell University Press, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Levchik and C.A. Wilkie. Char formation. In: Fire Retardancy of Polymeric Materials, ed. A.F. Grand and C.A. Wilkie, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, 2000, pp. 171–215.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.A. Parker and D.A. Kourtides. New fireworthy composites for use in transportation vehicles. Journal of Fire Science, 1983; 1:432–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. Pektas. High-temperature degradation of reinforced phenolic insulator. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1998; 68:1337–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Tipping. Composite solutions to the fire performance needs of mass transit. In: Proceedings of the 3 rd Conference on Composites in Fire, 9–10 Sept 2003, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Woodward. Modar composites: Achieving very low smoke and toxicity without compromising structural performance. In: Proceedings of the 3 rd Conference on Composites in Fire, 9–10 Sept 2003, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.J. Bansal, J. Mittal and P. Singh. Thermal stability and degradation studies of polyester resins. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1989; 37:1901–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.G. Gibson and J. Hume. Fire performance of composite panels for large marine structures. Plastics, Rubber and Composites, Processing and Applications, 1995; 23:175–183.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Arii, S. Ichihara, H. Nakagawa and N. Fujii. A kinetic study of the thermal decomposition of polyesters by controlled-rate thermogravimetry. Thermochimica Acta, 1998; 319:139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.G. Gibson, P.N.H. Wright, Y.-S. Wu, A.P. Mouritz, Z. Mathys and C.P. Gardiner. Modelling residual mechanical properties of polymer composites after fire. Plastics, Rubbers & Composites, 2003; 32:81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Knop and W. Krieger. Flame retardant gelcoats on composite laminates. In: Proceedings of the 3 rd Conference on Composites in Fire, 9–10 Sept 2003, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Regnier and B. Mortaigne. Analysis by pyrolysis/gas chromatograhy/mass spectrometry of glass fibre/vinylester thermal degradation products. Polymer Degradation & Stability, 1995; 49:419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Vogt. Thermal analysis of epoxy-resins: identification of decomposition products. Thermochemica Acta, 1985; 85:407–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H.W. Lochte, E.L. Strauss and R.T. Conley. The thermo-oxidative degradation of phenol-formaldehyde polycondensates: thermogravimetric and elemental composition studies of char formation. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1965; 9:2799–2810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G.P. Sullivan and H.W. Lochte. Thermal degradation of polymers. II. Mass spectrometric thermal analysis of phenol-formaldehyde polycondensates. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1996; 10: 619–635.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Knop and L.A. Pilato. Phenolic Resins. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Knop and W. Scheib. Chemistry and Application of Phenolic Resins. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    K.N. Ninan. Effect of heating rate on thermal decomposition kinetics of fibreglass phenolic. Engineering Notes, 1983; 23:347–348.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    C.P. Reghunadhan Nair, R.L. Bindu and K.N. Ninan. Thermal characteristics of addition-cure phenolic resins. Polymer Degradation & Stability, 2001; 73:251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    F.N. Cogswell. Thermoplastic aromatic polymer composites: a study of structure, processing and properties of carbon fibre reinforced PEEK and related materials, Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Day, J.D. Cooney and D.M. Wiles. The thermal degradation of poly(aryl-ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) as monitored by pyrolysis-GC/MS and TG/MS. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis, 1990; 18:163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    P. Moulinie, R.M. Paroli, Z.Y. Wang, A.H. Delgado, A.L. Guen, Y. Qi and J.-P. Gao. Investigating the degradation of thermoplastics by thermogravimetry-fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (TGFTIR). Polymer Testing, 1996; 15:75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Day and D.R. Budgell. Kinetics of the thermal degradation of poly(phenlyene sulfide). Thermochemica Acta, 1992; 203:465–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D.A. Kourtides, W.J. Gilwee and J.A. Parker. Thermochemical characterization of some thermally stable thermoplastic and thermoset polymers. Polymer Engineering & Science, 1979; 19:24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    P.S. Hill and G.C. White. Jet fire testing and performance of composite materials. In: Proceedings of the 1 st Conference on Composites in Fire, Sept 1999, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    J.R. Brown and Z. Mathys. Reinforcement and matrix effects on the combustion properties of glass reinforced polymer composites. Composites, 1997; 28A:675–681.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    B. Sussholz. Evaluation of Micron Sized Carbon Fibers Released From Burning Graphite Composites, NASA CR-159217.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    D.W. McKee and V.J. Memeault. Surface properties of carbon fibers. Chemistry & Physics of Carbon, 1981; 17:1.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    J.R. Brown and D.K.C. Hodgeman. An e.s.r. study of the thermal degradation of Kevlar 49 aramid. Polymer, 1982; 23:365–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    L. Penn and F. Larsen. Physicochemical properties of Kevlar 49 fibre. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1979; 23:59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    J.R. Brown and B.C. Ennis. Thermal analysis of Nomex® and Kevlar® fibres. Textile Research Journal, 1977; 47:62–66.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    S. Bourbigot, X. Flambard and F. Poutch. Study of the thermal degradation of high performance fibres — application to polybenzazole and p-aramid fibres. Polymer Degradation & Stability, 2001; 74:283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    S. Bourbigot, X. Flambard, F. Poutch and S. Duquesne. Cone calorimeter study of high performance fibres — application to polybenzazole and p-aramid fibres. Polymer Degradation & Stability, 2001; 74:481–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    S. Bourbigot and X. Flambard. Heat resistance and flammability of high performance fibres: a review. Fire and Materials, 2002; 26:155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    J.A. Conesa, A. Marcilla, R. Font and J.A. Caballero. Thermogravimetric studies on the thermal decompostion of polyethylene. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis, 1996; 36:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    J.R. Brown, P.D. Fawell and Z. Mathys. Fire-hazard assessment of extended-chain polyethylene and aramid composites by cone calorimetry. Fire & Materials, 1994;18:167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    D.M. Allison, A.J. Marchand and R.M. Morchat. Fire performance of composite materials in ships and offshore structures. Marine Structures, 1991; 4:129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    L.K. Kucner and H.L. McManus. Experimental studies of composite laminates damaged by fire. In: Proceedings of the 26 th International SAMPE Technical Conference, 17–20 October 1994, pp. 341–353.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    A.P. Mouritz and Z. Mathys. Post-fire mechanical properties of marine polymer composites. Composite Structures, 1999; 47:643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    A.P. Mouritz and Z. Mathys. Mechanical properties of fire-damaged glass-reinforced phenolic composites. Fire & Materials, 2000; 24:67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    A.P. Mouritz & Z. Mathys. Post-fire mechanical properties of glass-reinforced polyester composites. Composite Science & Technology, 2001; 61:475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    A.P. Mouritz. Post-fire flexural properties of fibre-reinforced polyester, epoxy and phenolic composites. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 2002; 37:1377–1386.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    A.P. Mouritz and C.P. Gardiner. Compression properties of fire-damaged polymer sandwich composites. Composites, 2002; 33A:609–620.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    P.G.B. Seggewiss. Properties of fire-damaged polymer matrix composites. In: Proceedings of the 3 rd Conference on Composites in Fire, 9–10 Sept 2003, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    D. Price, G. Anthony and P. Carty. Introduction: polymer combustion, condensed phase pyrolysis and smoke formation. In: Fire Retardant Materials, ed. A.R. Horrocks and D. Price, Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, 2002, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    J.P. Fanucci. Thermal response of radiantly heated Kevlar and graphite/epoxy composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 1987; 21:129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    G.A. Pering, P.V. Farrell and G.S. Springer. Degradation of tensile and shear properties of composites exposed to fire or high temperature. Journal of Composite Materials, 1989; 14:54–66.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    J. Hume. Assessing the fire performance characteristics of GRP composites. In: International Conference on Materials and Design Against Fire, London, 1992, pp. 11–15.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    S.C. Bates and P.R. Solomon. Elevated temperature and oxygen index apparatus and measurements. Journal of Fire Sciences, 1993; 11:271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    H.L.N. McManus and G.S. Springer. High temperature thermomechanical behaviour of carbon-phenolic and carbon-carbon composites, I. Analysis. Journal of Composite Materials, 1992; 26: 206–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    H.L.N. McManus and G.S. Springer. High temperature thermomechanical behaviour of carbon-phenolic and carbon-carbon composites, II. Results. Journal of Composite Materials, 1992; 26: 230–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    H.L. McManus. Prediction of fire damage to composite aircraft structures. In: Proceedings of the 9 th International Conference on Composite Materials, Madrid, Spain, July 1993, pp. 929–936.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    J.A. Milke and A.J. Vizzini. The effects of simulated fire exposure on glass-reinforced thermoplastic materials. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 1993; 5:113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    H. Ramamurthy, F.L. Test, J. Florio and J.B. Henderson. Internal pressure and temperature distribution in decomposing polymer composites. In: Proceedings of the 9 th Heat Transfer Conference, August 1990, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Y.I. Dimitrienko. Thermomechanical behaviour of composite materials and structures under high temperatures: 1. Materials. Composites, 1997; 28A:453–461.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    T. Ohlemiller and J. Shields. One and two-sided burning of thermally thin materials. Fire & Materials, 1993; 17:103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Personalised recommendations