Skip to main content

WHY ANTHROPOMORPHIC USER INTERFACE FEEDBACK CAN BE EFFECTIVE AND PREFERRED BY USERS

  • Conference paper

Abstract

This paper addresses and resolves an interesting question concerning the reason for anthropomorphic user interface feedback being more effective (in two of three contexts) and preferred by users compared to an equivalent non-anthropomorphic feedback. Firstly the paper will summarise the author’s three internationally published experiments and results. These will show statistically significant results indicating that in two of the three contexts anthropomorphic user interface feedback is more effective and preferred by users. Secondly some of the famous work by Reeves and Nass will be introduced. This basically shows that humans behave in a social manner towards computers through a user interface. Thirdly the reasons for the obtained results by the author are inextricably linked to the work of Reeves and Nass. It can be seen that the performance results and preferences are due to the subconscious social behaviour of humans towards computers through a user interface. The conclusions reported in this paper are of significance to user interface designers as they allow one to design interfaces which match more closely our human characteristics. These in turn would enhance the profits of a software house.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agarwal, A. (1999) Raw Computation. Scientific American., 281: 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. (1981) Ship or Sheep? An Intermediate Pronunciation Course, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. (1998) Tree or Three? An Elementary Pronunciation Course, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, B., Burgoon, J.K. et al. (1999) The Impact of Anthropomorphic Interfaces on Influence, Understanding and Credibility. Proc of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. M. (1997) Software Agents, AAAI Press, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, S.E and Ohaeri, J.O. (1994) Effects of Message Style on Users' Attributions Toward Agents. CHI '94 Human Factors in Computing System

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R., D. W. Massaro, et al. (1999) New Tools for Interactive Speech and Language Training: Using Animated Conversational Agents in the Classrooms of Profoundly Deaf Children. Method and Tool Innovations for Speech Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehn, D. M. and van Mulken, S. (2000) The Impact of Animated Interface Agents: A Review of Empirical Research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52: 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dertouzos, M. L. (1999) The Future of Computing. Scientific American., 281: 36–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (ed.) (1973) Darwin and Facial Expression: A Century of Research in Review, Academic Press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., Ellsworth, P. (1972) Emotion in the Human Face: Guidelines for Research and an Integration of Findings, Pergamon Press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilly, D. (1994) UNIX In a Nutshell, O'Reilly and Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttag, J. V. (1999) Communications Chameleons Scientific American., 281: 42, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM (1998), IBM ViaVoice 98 User Guide, IBM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, J. (1992) Teaching English Pronunciation, Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koda, T. and Maes, P. (1996a) Agents With Faces: The Effect of Personification. Proc of the 5th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koda, T. and Maes, P. (1996b) Agents With Faces: The Effects of Personification of Agents. Proc of HCI '96, British HCI Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P. (1994) Agents That Reduce Work and Information Overload. Communications of the ACM, 37(7): 31–40, 146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murano, P. (2001a) A New Software Agent ‘Learning’ Algorithm. People in Control An International Conference on Human Interfaces in ControlRooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, IEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murano, P. (2001b) Mapping Human-Oriented Information to Software Agents For Online Systems Usage. People in Control An International Conference on Human Interfaces in Control Rooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, IEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murano, P. (2002a) Effectiveness of Mapping Human-Oriented Information to Feedback From a Software Interface. 24th International Conference Information Technology Interfaces.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murano, P. (2002b) Anthropomorphic Vs Non-Anthropomorphic Software Interface Feedback for Online Systems Usage. 7th European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics (ERCIM) Workshop-‘User Interfaces for All’-Special Theme: ‘Universal Access’.Paris,. Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (C)-Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murano, P. (2003) Anthropomorphic Vs Non-Anthropomorphic Software Interface Feedback for Online Factual Delivery. 7th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV 2003) An International Conference on ComputerVisualisation and Graphics Applications, (c)-IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nass, C., Steuer, J. et al. (1994) Computers are Social Actors. CHI '94 Human Factors in Computing Systems-‘Celebrating Interdependence’, ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, B., Lombard, M. and Melwani, G. (1992) Faces on the Screen: Pictures or Natural Experience, International Communication Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, B. and Nass, C. (1996) The Media Equation How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (1992) Designing the User Interface- Strategies for Effective Human Computer Interaction, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, M. and Southworth, S. (1982) Maps a Visual Survey and Design Guide. Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ur, P. (1996) A Course in Language Teaching-Practice and Theory, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zue, V. (1999) Talking With Your Computer. Scientific American., 281: 40

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Murano, P. (2007). WHY ANTHROPOMORPHIC USER INTERFACE FEEDBACK CAN BE EFFECTIVE AND PREFERRED BY USERS. In: Chen, CS., Filipe, J., Seruca, I., Cordeiro, J. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems VII. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5347-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5347-4_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5323-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5347-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics