Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland

  • Chapter
Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 3))

Abstract

The management of invasive non-native species is a frequent cause of conflict in the field of biodiversity conservation because perceptions of their costs and benefits differ among stakeholder groups. A lack of cohesion between scientific researchers, the commercial sector and policy makers lies at the root of a widespread failure to develop and implement sustainable management practices for invasive species. The crisis of this situation is intensified by drivers stemming from international conventions and directives to address invasive species issues. There are further direct conflicts between legislative instruments promoting biodiversity conservation on the one hand while liberalizing trade at the national, European and global level on the other. The island of Ireland provides graphic illustration of the importance of cross-jurisdictional approaches to biological invasions. Using primarily Irish examples in this review, we emphasize the importance of approaching risk assessment, risk reduction and control or eradication policies from a cost-efficient, highly flexible perspective, incorporating linkages between environmental, economic and social objectives. The need for consolidated policies between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland is particularly acute, though few model cross-border mechanisms for such consolidation are available. The importance of engaging affected stakeholders through positive interactions is discussed with regard to reducing the currently fragmented nature of invasive species management between the two jurisdictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson R. and Bell A.C. 2002. A first record of the Lily Beetle Liliocerus lilii (Scopoli) in Ireland. Coleopterist 11: 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderman D.J. and Wickins J.F. 1996. Crayfish CULTURE, Laboratory Leaflet No. 76. CEFAS Lowestoft, MAFF, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellingham P.J., Duncan R.P., Lee W.G. and Buxton R.P. 2004. Seedling growth rate and survival do not predict invasiveness in naturalized woody plants in New Zealand. Oikos 106: 308–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn T.M. and Duncan R.P. 2001. Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414: 195–197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boag B. and Yeates G.W. 2001. The potential impact of the New Zealand flatworm, a predator of earthworms, in western Europe. Ecol. Appl. 11: 1276–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock J.M., Hodder K.H., Manchester S.J. and Stevenson M.J. 1996. Review of Information, Policy and Legislation on Species Translocations. JNCC Report No. 261. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J.H. 1989. Patterns, modes and extents of invasions by vertebrates. In: Drake J.A., Mooney H.A., di Castri F., Groves R.H., Kruger F.G., Rejamek M. and Williamson M. (eds), Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, pp. 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan D. 2003. Alien species research requirements for delivery of the UK Biodiversity Action Plan — Discussion Paper. Just Ecology, URL: www.justecology.co.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassey P. 2002. Life history and ecology influences establishment success of introduced birds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76: 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark P.F., Rainbow P.S., Robbins R.S., Smith B., Yeomans W.E., Thomas M. and Dobson G. 1998. The alien Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinesis (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura), in the Thames catchment. J. Marine Biol. Assoc. UK. 78: 1215–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Environmental Co-operation (CEC) 2002. The North American Mosaic: A State of the Environment Report. Montréal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello M.J. 1993. Biogeography of alien amphipods occurring in Ireland, and interactions with native species. Crustaceana 65: 287–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox M.L. 2001. The status of the Lily Beetle Lilioceris lilii (Scopoli, 1763) in Britain (Chrysomelidae: Criocerinae). Coleopterist 10: 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross R.J. 1975. Biological flora of the British Isles Rhododendron ponticum. J. Ecol. 63: 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross J.R. 1981. The establishment of Rhododendron ponticum in the Killarney oakwoods, SW Ireland. J. Ecol. 69: 807–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross J.R. 1982. The invasion and impact of Rhododendron ponticum in native Irish vegetation. J. Life Sci. Roy. Dublin Soc. 3: 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalmazzone S. 2000. Economic factors affecting the vulnerability to biological invasions. In: Perrings C., Williamson M. and Dalmazzone S. (eds), The Economics of Biological Invasions. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly H.V. 1995. Endangered species: doctoral students in systematic entomology. Am. Entomol. 41: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), 2003. Review of Non-native Species Policy. Report of the Working Group. DEFRA publications, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Northern Ireland (DARD), 2004. Cap Reform. Cross-Compliance Consultation Paper. http://www.dardni.gov.uk/file/con0409b.doc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J. and Case T.J. 1986. Overview: introductions, extinctions, exterminations and invasions. In: Diamond J. and Case T.J. (eds), Community Ecology. Harper & Row, New York, USA, pp. 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick J.T.A., Elwood R.W. and Montgomery W.I. 1995. The behavioural basis of a speciesreplacement — differential aggression and predation between the introduced Gammarus-pulex and the native Gammarus duebeni celticus (Amphipoda). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37: 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake J.A., Mooney H.A., di Castri F., Groves R.H., Kruger F.G., Rejmánek M. and Williamson M. (eds) 1989. Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan R.P., Blackburn T.M. and Sol D. 2003. The ecology of bird introductions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34: 71–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne R. 2003. Some recent insect and mite introductions to Ireland. In: Moriarty C. and Murray D. (eds), Biological Invaders: The Impact of Exotic Species. Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson H.J. and Gillmor D.A. 1999. The Rural Environment Protection Scheme of the Republic of Ireland. Land Use Policy 16: 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairley J. 2001. A Basket of Weasels (Published privately). Belfast, Northern Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenner F. and Ratcliffe F.N. 1965. Myxomatosis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth D.M., Duncan R.P., Bomford M. and Moore G. 2004. Climatic suitability, life-history traits, introduction effort and the establishment and spread of introduced mammals in Australia. Conserv. Biol. 18: 557–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray H.C.J. 2002. Challenges for taxonomy. The discipline will have to reinvent itself if it is to survive and flourish. Nature 417: 17–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling L.M. and Baker S.J. 1989. The eradication of the muskrats and coypus from Britain. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 38: 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grainger J.N.R. 1992. The probable effects of climate change on invertebrate growth and reproduction with particular reference to Ireland. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 22: 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gropp R.E. 2003. Are university natural science collections going extinct? Bioscience 5: 550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotkopp E., Rejmanek M. and Rost T.L. 2002. Towards a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 Pine (Pinus) species. Am. Nat. 159: 396–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden T. and Harrington R. 2000. Exploring Irish Mammals. Townhouse, Dublin, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemami M.R., Watkinson A.R. and Dolman P.M. 2004. Habitat selection by sympatric muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a lowland commercial pine forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 194: 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herborg L.M., Rushton S.P., Clare A.S. and Bentley M.G. 2003. Spread of the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards) in Continental Europe: analysis of a historical data set. Hydrobiologia 503: 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins S.I., Richardson D.M. and Cowling R.M. 2000. Using a dynamic landscape model for planning the management of alien plant invasions. Ecol. Appl. 10: 1833–1848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilty J. and Merenlender A.M. 2003. Studying biodiversity on private lands. Conserv. Biol. 17:132–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden N.M., Bereton A.J., Fealy R. and Sweeney J. 2003. Possible changes in Irish climate and its impact on barley and potatoe yields. Agric. For. Meterol. 116: 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdich D.M. and Rodgers W.D. 1997. The white-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in Great Britain and Ireland with particular reference to its conservation in Great Britain. Bull. Francais Peche Pisicult. 347: 597–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords. 2002. What on Earth? The Threat to the Science Underpinning Conservation. Select Committee on Science and Technology, third report, HL Paper 118(i), London, Stationary Office, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins G.W. and Freckleton R.P. 2002. Declines in the number of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. Anim. Conserv. 5: 245–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAC (Industries Assistance Commission) 1985. Biological Control of Echium Species (Including Patersons Curse/Salvation Jane). Industries Assistance Commission Report No. 371. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (World Conservation Union) 2000. Guidelines for the Prevention of Biodiversity Loss Caused by Alien Invasive Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetter K. and Paine T.D. 2004. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for biological control in the urban landscape. Biol. Control 30: 312–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judgement of the Court 03-12-1998. Anklagemyndighed v. Ditlev Bluhme. http://www.eel.nl/cases/HvJEG/697j0067.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly D.W., Dick J.T.A., Montgomery W.I. and MacNeil C. 2003. Differences in composition of macroinvertebrate communities with invasive and native Gammarus spp.(Crustacea: Amphipoda). Freshwater Biol. 48: 306–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiely G. 1999. Climate change in Ireland from precipitation and streamflow observations. Adv. Water Resour. 23: 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King C.M. 1984. Immigrant Killers. Introduced Predators and the Conservation of Birds in New Zealand. Oxford University Press, Auckland, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D. and Sutherland W.J. 2003. How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J. Appl. Ecol. 40: 947–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar C.S. and Lodge D.M.. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 199–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine J.M. and d’Antonio C.M. 2003. Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conserv. Biol. 17: 322–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine J.M., Adler P.B. and Yelenik S.G. 2004. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 7: 975–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale W.M. 1994. Inviting trouble — introduced pasture species in northern Australia. Aust. J. Ecol. 19: 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale W.M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80: 1522–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack R.N. 1996. Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biol. Conserv. 78: 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack R.N., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W.M., Evans H., Clout M. and Bazzaz F.A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecol. Appl. 10: 689–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil C., Elwood R.W. and Dick J.T.A. 1999. Predator-prey interactions between brown trout Salmo trutta and native and introduced amphipods; their implications for fish diets. Ecography 22: 686–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manchester S.J. and Bullock J.M. 2000. The impacts of non-native species on UK biodiversity and the effectiveness of control. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 845–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCorrey M., Curtis T.G.F. and Otte M.L. 2003. Spartina in Ireland. In Otte M.L. (ed.), Wetlands of Ireland, Distribution, Ecology, Uses and Economic Value. University College Press, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minchin D. 2000. Modes of introduction of exotic animals into Irish waters. In: Rushton B.S. (ed.), Biodiversity: The Irish Dimension. Royal Irish Academy, Dublin Ireland, pp. 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minchin D., Maguire C.M. and Rossell R. 2003. The zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorha. Pallas) invades Ireland: human mediated vectors and the potential for rapid international dispersal. Biol. Environ. 103B: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody M.E. and Mack R.N. 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions — the importance of nascent foci. J. Appl. Ecol. 25: 1009–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore J.P., Dynes C. and Murchie A.K. 1998. The status and public perception of the New Zealand flatworm, Artioposthia triangulata (Dendy) in Northern Ireland. Pedobiologia 2: 563–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor C., Marvier M. and Kareiva P. 2003. Biological vs. social, economic and political priority-setting in conservation. Ecol. Lett. 6: 706–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden J.D. and Poff N.L. 2004. Clarifying biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 283–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrings C., Williamson M. and Dalmazzone S. (eds) 2000. The Economics of Biological Invasions. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrings C., Williamson M., Barbier E.B., Delfino D., Dalmazzone S., Shogren J., Simmons P. and Watkinson A.R. 2002. Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective. Conserv. Ecol. 6: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D., Lach L., Zuniga R. and Morrison D. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of non-indigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50: 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullin A.S. and Knight T.M. 2001. Effectiveness in conservation practice: pointers from medicine and public health. Conserv. Biol. 15: 50–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putman R.J. and Moore N.P. 1998. Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitats. Mammal Rev. 28: 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupp M.J., Davidson J.A., Koehler C.J., Sador C.S. and Reichelderfer K. 1988. Decision-making consideration for aesthetic damage caused by pests. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 34: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A. and Atkinson S.K. 2004. Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 7: 781–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouget M. and Richardson D.M. 2003. Inferring process from pattern in plant invasions: a semimechanistic model incorporating propagule pressure and environmental factors. Am. Nat. 162: 713–724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler T. 1997. Global Challenges. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader G. and Unger J.G. 2003. Plant quarantine as a measure against invasive alien species: the framework of the International Plant Protection Convention and the plant health regulations in the European Union. Biol. Invas. 5: 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaman J.T., Turvey W.S., Ottaway J.S., Dixon R.J. and Gilmour A.R. 1989. Investigations into the toxicity of Echium plantagineum in sheep. Part 1. Field grazing experiments. Aust. Veter. J. 66: 279–285.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharov A.A. and Liebhold A.M. 1998. Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Ecol. Appl. 8: 833–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea K. 1998. Management of populations in conservation, harvesting and control. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 371–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea K. and Chesson P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheail J. 1988. The extermination of the muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) in inter-war Britain. Arch. Nat. Hist. 15: 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D. 1995. Why do introduced species appear to devastate islands more than mainland areas? Pacific Sci. 49: 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D. and Alexander M. 1998. Assessing risks to ecological systems from biological introductions (excluding genetically modified organisms). In: Calow P. (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Risk Assessment and Management. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D. 2003. How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species? Conserv. Biol. 17: 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood K.S. 1994. Site invisibility by exotic birds and mammals. Biol. Conserv. 69: 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth A.K. and James C.D. 2004. Characteristics of Australia’s rangelands and key design features for monitoring biodiversity. Aust. Ecol. 29: 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D., Timmermans S. and Lefebvre L. 2002. Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Anim. Behav. 63: 495–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens P.A., Jules N.P. and Sutherland W.J. 2003. Agriculture, transport policy and landscape heterogeneity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 555–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suding K.N., Gross K.L. and Houseman G.R. 2004. Alternative stable states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 46–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland W.J., Pullin A.S., Dolman P.M. and Knight T.M. 2004. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 305–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turpie J. 2004. The role of resource economics in the control of invasive alien plants in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 100: 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek P.M., d’Antonio C.M., Loope L.L. and Westbrooks R. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci. 84: 468–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainger L.A. and Price E.W. 2004. Evaluating quality of life, economic vulnerabilities, and drivers of ecosystem change. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 94: 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace J.F., Caccetta P.A. and Kiiveri T. 2004. Recent developments in analysis of spatial and temporal data for landscape qualities and monitoring. Aust. Ecol. 29: 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick T. 1940. A contribution to the ecology of the musk-rat (Ondatra zibethica) in the British Isles. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, Ser. A 110: 165–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson A.R., Freckleton R.P., Robinson R.A. and Sutherland W.J. 2000. Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Science 289: 1554–1557.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson I. and Novelly P. 2004. Making the biodiversity monitoring system sustainable: design issues for large-scale monitoring systems. Aust. Ecol. 29: 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson L. and Stokes A. 2004. Seahorses to Seaurchins. The Next Big Splash in Irish Aquaculture. Technical Report. Bord Iascaigh Mara Aquaculture Development Division, Irish Sea Fisheries Board, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler Q.D. 2004. Taxonomic triage and the poverty of taxonomy. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 359: 571–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M. 1989. Mathematical models of invasion. In: Drake J.A., Mooney H.A., di Castri F., Groves R.H., Kruger F.J., Rejmánek M. and Williamson M. (eds), Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, pp. 329–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M. 1996. Biological Invasions. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. QUERCUS, School of Biology & Biochemistry, Queens University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK

    K. E. Stokes, K. P. O’neill, W. I. Montgomery, J. T. A. Dick, C. A. Maggs & R. A. Mcdonald

Authors
  1. K. E. Stokes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. P. O’neill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. I. Montgomery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. T. A. Dick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. A. Maggs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. A. Mcdonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. E. Stokes .

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stokes, K.E., O’neill, K.P., Montgomery, W.I., Dick, J.T.A., Maggs, C.A., Mcdonald, R.A. (2006). The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5283-5_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation