Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impacts of community-based conservation on local communities in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal

  • Chapter
Book cover Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 3))

Abstract

Approaches to the management of protected areas that involve the participation of local communities are now being widely promoted. However, the impacts of such community-based conservation initiatives on local communities remain poorly defined. This research examines the socio-economic impacts of community-based conservation within the Annapurna Conservation Area (ACA), Nepal, through semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire survey with local residents, situated both within and outside the protected area. Results indicate that local communities have received a number of benefits from conservation, including improvements in access to forest resources, improved basic infrastructure such as drinking water, trails and bridges, and improvements in health, sanitation and social services. However, relatively few people (14.9%) within ACA receive direct financial income from tourism. Local communities also experience a number of costs of being involved in conservation, the most significant of which is increased crop damage by wildlife. Eighty-four percent of respondents within ACA have experienced problems of crop damage, accounting for 6% (rice) to 23% (maize) of total production. Depredation of livestock by wildlife is also experienced; mean losses per household being the equivalent of £3.9 (Rs. 479.70) each year. However, 66% of respondents within ACA reported that they had never experienced this problem. These results indicate that the socio-economic benefits of community-based approaches to conservation can outweigh the costs, even though the latter are significant. However, a participatory approach to management of problematic animal species will need to be developed within ACA, if conflicts between local communities and protected area management are to be avoided in future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbot J.I.O. and Mace R. 1999. Managing protected woodlands: fuelwood collection and law enforcement in Lake Malawi National Park. Conserv. Biol. 13: 418–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams B. and Hulme D. 1998. Conservation and Communities: Changing Narratives, Policies and Practices in African Conservation. Working Paper No. 4. IDPM, University of Manchester, Manchester, 31 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akama J.S., Lant C.L. and Burnett G.W. 1995. Conflicting attitudes towards state wildlife conservation programmes in Kenya. Society Nat. Resour. 8: 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajracharya S.B. 2004. Community Involvement in Conservation: An Assessment of Impacts and Implications in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, 314 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajracharya S.B., Furley P.A. and Newton A.C. 2005. Effectiveness of community involvement in delivering conservation benefits to the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Environ. Conserv. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Banskota K. and Sharma B. 1995. Tourism for Mountain Community Development: Case Study Report on the Annapurna and Gorkha Regions of Nepal. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, 233 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon K.E. and Wells M. 1992. Planning for people and parks: design dilemmas. World Develop. 20: 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R. 1997. Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp. xx + 297.

    Google Scholar 

  • DNPWC 1996. Annual Progress Report for Fiscal Year 2052–53. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation/HMG, Kathmandu, Nepal.annexes + 34 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley N., Gujja B., Jackson B., Jeanrenaud J., Oviedo G., Phillips A., Rosable P., Stolton S. and Wells S. 1999. Challenges for protected areas in 21st century. In: Stolton S. and Dudley N. (eds), Partnerships for Protection. WWF, IUCN and Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, UK, pp. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann F. 1994. Community environmental action: the national policy context. In: Western D., Wright M.R. and Strum S. (eds), Natural Connection: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 393–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiallo E.A. and Jacobson S.K. 1995. Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environ. Conserv. 22: 241–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M.J. and Gagnon C. 1999. An assessment of social impacts of national parks on communities in Quebec, Canada. Environ. Conserv. 26: 200–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire K.B. 1997. Conservation and social development: an assessment of Wolong and other reserves in China. In: Ghimire K.B. and Pimbert M.P. (eds), Social Change and Conservation. Earthscan Publications Limited, London, pp. 187–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire K.B. and Pimbert M.P. 1997. Social change and conservation: an overview of issues and concepts. In: Ghimire K.B. and Pimbert M.P. (eds), Social Change and Conservation: Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas. Earthscan Publications Limited, London, pp. 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson C.C. and Marks S.A. 1995. Transferring rural hunters into conservationists: an assessment of community-based wildlife management in Africa. World Develop. 23: 941–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurung G. 2005. Securing financial sustainability for Annapurna Conservation Area. In: Sharma U.R. and Yonzon P.B. (eds), People and Protected Areas in South Asia. IUCN South Asia and Resources Himalaya Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal, pp. 86–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurung C.P. and DeCoursey M.A. 1994. The Annapurna Conservation Area Project: a pioneering example of sustainable tourism?. In: Cater E. and Lowman G. (eds), Ecotourism: A Sustainable Option?. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackel J.D. 1998. Community conservation and the future of Africa’s wildlife. Conserv. Biol. 13: 726–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen J.T. 1993. Park people relations in Kosi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal — a socio-economic analysis. Environ. Conserv. 20: 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough J.L. 1988. Obstacles to effective management of conflicts between national parks and surrounding human communities in developing countries. Environ. Conserv. 15: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough J. 1991. Michiru Mountain Conservation Area: integrating conservation with human needs. In: West P.C. and Brechin S.R. (eds), Resident Peoples and National Parks: Social Dilemmas and Strategies in International Conservation. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infield M. and Namara A. 2001. Community attitudes and behaviour towards conservation: an assessment of a community conservation programme in around Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. Oryx 35: 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inskipp C. and Inskipp T. 2001. A popular guide to the birds and mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area. KMTNC-Annapurna Conservation Area Project. Pokhara, Nepal, x+41 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN 1998. Towards Participatory Management of Protected Areas in Asia Region. IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN 2002. 2002 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, www.redlist.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN 2003. Durban Action Plan. In: The Vth IUCN World Park Congress Available from www.iucn.org/themes/wcpa/wpc2003/. IUCN, Durban, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangwana K. and Mako R.F. 2001. Conservation, livelihoods and the intrinsic value of wildlife: Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. In: Humle D. and Murphree M.W. (eds), African Wildlife and Livelihoods: the Promise and Performance of Community Conservation. James Currey Limited, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim E. and Karky B.S. 2001. Water Resource Use in the Annapurna Conservation Area: Assessment of Micro-Hydropower Management in Sikles and Chhomrong. KMTNC-Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara, Nepal, 34 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • KMTNC-ACAP 1997. A new approach in protected area management. KMTNC-Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara, Nepal, 39 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • KMTNC-ACAP 1999. Two Years Retrospective Report: 1996/97 & 1997/98. Published Report. KMTNC-Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara, 30 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • KMTNC-ACAP 2001. Two Years Retrospective Report July 1998–July 2000. Published Report. KMTNC-Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara, 44 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhl J.F., Upreti R.K. and Sharma U.R. 1988. National parks and local development: grasses and people in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Environ. Conserv. 15: 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D.M. and Alpert P. 1997. Trophy hunting and wildlife conservation in Zambia. Conserv. Biol. 11: 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusigi W.J. 1982. Future directions for the Afrotropical realm. In: McNeely J.A. and Miller K.R. (eds), The Third World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas. Bali, Indonesia, 1984. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, DC, pp. 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhusudan M.D. 2003. Living amidst large wildlife: livestock and crop depredation by large mammals in the interior villages of Bhadra Tiger Reserve, south India. Environ. Manage. 31: 466–475.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely J.A. 1995. Partnerships for conservation: an introduction. In: McNeely J.A. (ed.), Expanding Partnerships in Conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta J.N. and Heinen J.T. 2001. Does community-based conservation shape favourable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environ. Manage. 28: 165–177.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta J.N. and Kellert S.R. 1998. Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: a case study in the Makalu-Barun Conservation Area. Environ. Conserv. 25: 320–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe S. 1994. The Zimbabwe Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE). In: Western D. and Wright R.M. (eds), Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 161–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miah D., Rahman L. and Ashan F. 2001. Assessment of crop damage by wildlife in Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh. Tigerpaper 28: 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra H. 1982a. Balancing human needs and conservation in Nepal’s Royal Chitwan National Park. Ambio 11: 246–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra H.R. 1982b. A delicate balance: tigers, rhinoceros, tourists and park management vs. the needs of local people in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. In: McNeely J.A. and Miller K.R. (eds), The Third World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas. Bali, Indonesia, 1984. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, DC, pp. 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphree M.W. 1994. The role of institutions in community-based conservation. In: Western D., Wright R.M. and Strum S.C. (eds), in Community-based Conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 403–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves L. 1997. Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conserv. Biol. 12: 156–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepal S. 2002. Linking parks and people: Nepal’s experience in resolving conflicts in parks and protected areas. Int. J. Sustain. Develop. World Ecol. 9: 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepal S.K., Kohler T. and Banzhaf B.R. 2002. Great Himalayas: Tourism and the Dynamics of Changes in Nepal. Swiss Foundation for Alpine Research in collaboration with the Centre for Development and Environment, University of Berne, Zurich, 92pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark W.D., Leonard N.L., Sariko H.I. and Gamassa D.G.M. 1993. Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to protected areas in Tanzania. Biol. Conserv. 63: 177–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn F.V. and Parker G.E. 2003. Towards an integrated approach for reducing the conflict between elephants and people: a review of current research. Oryx 37: 80–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviedo G. and Brown J. 1999. Building alliances with indigenous peoples to establish and manage protected areas. In: Stolton S. and Dudley N. (eds), Partnerships for Protection. WWF, IUCN and Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, pp. 98–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry D. and Campbell B. 1992. Attitudes of rural communities to animal wildlife and its utilization in Chobe Enclave and Mababe Depression, Bostwana. Environ. Conserv. 19: 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl M.C. 1994. Local initiatives and rewards for biodiversity conservation: Crater Mountain Wildlife Management Area, Papua New Guinea. In: Western D. and Wright M.R. (eds), in Community-based Conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimbert M.P. and Pretty J.N. 1997. Parks, people and professionals: putting ‘participation’ protected-area management. In: Ghimire K. and Pimbert M.P. (eds), Social Change and Conservation. Earthscan Publication Limited, UK, pp. 297–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch K.F. 1998. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. SAGE Publications, London, pp. xv + 319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao K.S., Maikhuri R.K., Nautiyal S. and Saxena K.G. 2002a. Crop damage and livestock depredation by wildlife: a case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. J. Environ. Manage. 66: 317–327.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao M., Rabinowitz A. and Khaing S.T. 2002b. Status review of the protected area system in Myanmar, with recommendations for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 16: 360–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sah J.P. and Heinen J.T. 2001. Wetland resource use and conservation attitudes among indigenous and migrant peoples in Ghodaghodi Lake area, Nepal. Environ. Conserv. 28: 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salafsky N. and Wollenberg E. 2000. Linking livelihood and conservation: a conceptual framework and scale for assessing the integration of human needs and biodiversity. World Develop. 28:1421–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekhar N.U. 1998. Crop and livestock depredation caused by wild animals in protected areas: the case of Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, India. Environ. Conserv. 25: 160–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma U.R. 1990. An overview of park-people interactions in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Landscape Urban Plan. 19: 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma U.R. and Wells M.P. 1996. Nepal. In: Lutz E. and Caldecott J. (eds), Decentralisation and Biodiversity Conservation. The World Bank, New York, pp. 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherpa M.N., Coburn B. and Gurung C.P. 1986. Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal: Operational Plan. King Mahendra Trust for Nature Conservation and World Wildlife Fund, Kathmandu, xiii+Annexes+74pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Songorwa A.L., Buhrs T. and Hughey K.F.D. 2000. Community-based wildlife management in Africa: a critical assessment of the literature. Nat. Resour. J. 40: 603–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spergel B. 1997. Compensation and substitute programmes. In: Borrini-Feyerbend G. (eds), Seeking Social Sustainability in Conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp. 91–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolton S. and Dudley N. (eds) 1999. Partnerships for Protection. UK Earthscan Publication Ltd, London, xvii + 283pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straede S. and Helles F. 2000. Park-people conflict resolution in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal: buying time at high cost? Environ. Conserv. 27: 368–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studsrod J.E. and Wegge P. 1995. Park-people relationships: the case of damage caused by park animals around the Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal. Environ. Conserv. 22: 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J. and Schaik C.V. 2002. Why the world needs parks. In: Terborgh J., Schaik C.V., Davenport L. and Rao M. (eds), Making Parks Work: Strategies for Preserving Tropical Nature. Island Press, Washington, pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP 2002. Nepal Human Development Report 2001: Poverty Reduction and Governance. UNDP, Kathmandu, xii+154pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright C. and Wehrmeyer W. 1998. Success in integrating conservation and development? a study from Zambia World Develop. 26: 933–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weladji R.B. and Tchamba M.N. 2003. Conflict between people and protected areas within the Benoue Wildlife Conservation Area, north Cameroon. Oryx 37: 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells M. and Brandon K. 1992. People and Parks: Linking Protected Area Management with Local Communities. World Bank, World Wildlife Fund and USAID, Washington, DC, xii+98pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. King Mahendra Trust for Nature Conservation, P. O. Box 3712, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Siddhartha B. Bajracharya

  2. Institute of Geography, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP

    Siddhartha B. Bajracharya & Peter A. Furley

  3. School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK

    Adrian C. Newton

Authors
  1. Siddhartha B. Bajracharya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter A. Furley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adrian C. Newton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bajracharya, S.B., Furley, P.A., Newton, A.C. (2006). Impacts of community-based conservation on local communities in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5283-5_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation