Skip to main content

Diversity patterns of Bornean butterfly assemblages

  • Chapter
Arthropod Diversity and Conservation

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 1))

Abstract

Borneo contains a diverse rainforest butterfly community, but its forests are under threat from logging and ENSO- (El NiƱo Southern Oscillation) induced fires. Contrasts in butterfly assemblage structure were examined in nine 450 ha landscapes in logged forest, primary unburned continuous and isolated forest, and forest affected by surface fires during the 1997/98 ENSO event. Temporally the effect of the 1997/98 ENSO event was followed in a single burned landscape from 1997 to 2004. In total, 517 species were present in 190 sampling sites. There was a five-fold difference in species richness among landscapes, with highest richness in continuous landscapes and lowest richness in burned landscapes. Richness was also higher in logged forest than proximate unlogged forest. Temporally, species richness dropped dramatically from 1997 to 1998, but after-wards increased remaining, however, substantially lower than pre-ENSO (1997) sampling. Sites in burned landscapes were distinct from other sites in terms of vegetation structure with the slash-and-burn area the most dissimilar to other landscapes. There was much less structure among unburned landscapes. The pattern of butterfly community composition was similar to that of vegetation structure with the community from the slash-and-burn area the most distinct. However, there was much less overlap among sites from different landscapes. Temporally, 1998 possessed the most distinct assemblage when compared to assemblages from other years. The community composition was, however, slowly returning to a pre-disturbance composition. Variance in community composition explained by environmental and spatial factors differed substantially among landscapes. The spatial fraction was the only explanatory component in recently burned landscapes and a proximate small unburned isolate, but explained no variation in logged landscapes. The environmental fraction explained substantial amounts of variation in logged landscapes and the slash-and-burn area. When all landscapes were pooled high proportions of variation in butterfly community composition were explained by both geographic distance between sites and environmental variables. In contrast when only unburned landscapes were considered, most variation was explained by the geographic distance among them. Despite differences among landscapes there was a general pattern of relatively sharp decline in similarity at short distances that levels out over greater distances, a result that agrees with previous studies on other tropical species assemblages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beck J., Schulze C.H., Linsenmair K.E. and Fiedler K. 2002. From forest to farmland: diversity of geometrid moths along two habitat gradients on Borneo. J. Trop. Ecol. 18: 33ā€“51.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Borcard D., Legendre P. and Drapeau P. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045ā€“1055.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bray J.R. and Curtis J.T. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325ā€“349.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Casgrain P. 2001. Permute! 3.4.9. Userā€™s Manual. Freely available at: http://www.fas.umontreal.ca/biol/casgrain/en/labo/permute/index.html.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Caswell H. 1976. Community structure: a neutral model analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 46: 327ā€“354.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Clarke K.R. and Gorley R.N. 2001. Primer v5: user manual/tutorial. Primer-E Ltd, Plymouth.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cleary D.F.R. 2003. An examination of scale of assessment, logging and ENSO-induced fires on butterfly diversity in Borneo. Oecologia 135: 313ā€“321.

    PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cleary D.F.R. 2004. Assessing the use of butterflies as indicators of logging in Borneo at three taxonomic levels. J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 429ā€“435.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cleary D.F.R. and Genner M.J. 2004. Changes in rain forest butterfly diversity following major ENSO-induced fires in Borneo. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 13: 129ā€“140.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cleary D.F.R. and Mooers A.Ƙ. 2004. Butterfly species richness and community composition in forests affected by ENSO-induced burning and habitat isolation in Borneo. J. Trop. Ecol. 20: 359ā€“367.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cleary D.F.R., Genner M.J., Boyle T.J.B., Setyawati T., Angraeti C.D. and Menken S.B.J. Dependence of bird species richness and composition upon local-and large-scale environmental factors in Borneo. Landscape Ecol. (in press).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Colwell R.K. 2000. EstimateS version 6.0b1: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Freeware published at http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/EstimateS.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Condit R., Pitman N., Leigh E.G., Chave J., Terborgh J., Foster R.B., Nunez P., Aguilar S., Valencia R., Villa G., Muller-Landau H.C., Losos E. and Hubbell S.P. 2002. Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295: 666ā€“669.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ellingsen K.E. 2002. Soft-sediment benthic biodiversity on the continental shelf in relation to environmental variability. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Series 232: 15ā€“27.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Harrison R.D. 2000. Repercussions of El NiƱo, drought causes extinction and the breakdown of mutualism in Borneo. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 267: 911ā€“915.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hill J.K., Hamer K.C., Tangah J. and Dawood M. 2001. Ecology of tropical butterflies in rainforest gaps. Oecologia 128: 294ā€“302.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Holmgren M., Scheffer M., Ezcurra E., Gutierrez J.R. and Mohren G.M.J. 2001. El NiƱo effects on the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 89ā€“94.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Howard P.C., Viskanic P., Davenport T.R.B., Kigenyi F.W., Baltzer M., Dickinson C.J., Lwanga J.S., Matthews R.A. and Balmford A. 1998. Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394: 472ā€“475.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hubbell S.P. 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Monographs in Population Biology 32. Princeton University Press, pp. 375

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Jepson P., Jarvie J.K., MacKinnon K. and Monk K.A. 2001. The end of Indonesiaā€™s lowland forests? Science 292: 859.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Legendre P. and Gallagher E.D. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271ā€“280.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Longino J.T., Coddington J. and Colwell R.K. 2002. The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology 83: 689ā€“702.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Margalef R. 1968. Perspectives in Ecological Theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 111.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nepstad D.C., Moreira A., Verissimo A., Lefebre P., Schlesinger P., Potter C., Nobre C., Setzer A., Krug T., Barros A.C., Alencar A. and Pereira J.R. 1998. Forest fire prediction and prevention in the Brazilian Amazon. Conserv. Biol. 12: 951ā€“953.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Parmesan C., Ryrholm N., Stefanescu C., Hill J.K., Thomas C.D., Descimon H., Huntley B., Kaila L., Kullberg J., Tammaru T., Tennent W.J., Thomas J.A. and Warren M. 1999. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399: 579ā€“583.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Peltonen M., Liebold A.M., BjĆørnstad O.N. and Williams D.W. 2002. Spatial synchrony in forest insect outbreaks: roles of regional stochasticity and dispersal. Ecology 83: 3120ā€“3129.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Plotkin J.B. and Muller-Landau H.C. 2002. Sampling the species composition of a landscape. Ecology 83: 3344ā€“3356.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Potts M.D., Ashton P.S., Kaufman L.S. and Plotkin J.B. 2002. Habitat patterns in tropical forests: a comparison of 105 plots in northwest Borneo. Ecology 83: 2782ā€“2797.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Putz F.E., Blate G.M., Redford K.H., Fimbel R. and Robinson J. 2001. Tropical forest management and conservation of biodiversity: an overview. Conserv. Biol. 15: 7ā€“20.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ricketts T.H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am. Nat. 158: 88ā€“99.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Rozenzweig M.L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 463.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Siegert F., Ruecker G., Hinrichs A. and Hoffmann A.A. 2001. Increased damage from fires in logged forests during drought caused by El NiƱo. Nature 414: 437ā€“440.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Slik J.W.F., Poulsen A.D., Ashton P.S., Cannon C.H., Eichhorn K.A.O., Kartawinata K., Lanniari I., Nagamasu H., Nakagawa M., van Nieuwstadt M.G.L., Payne J., Purwaningsih, Saridan A., Sidiyasa K., Verburg R.W., Webb C.O. and Wilkie P. 2003. A floristic analysis of the lowland dipterocarp forests of Borneo. J. Biogeogr. 30: 1517ā€“1531.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Spencer M., Schwartz S.S. and Blaustein L. 2002. Are there fine-scale patterns in community similarity among temporary freshwater pools? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 11: 71ā€“78.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Spitzer K., Jaros J., Havelka J. and Leps J. 1997. Effect of small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indochinese montane rainforest. Biol. Conserv. 80: 9ā€“15.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Sutcliffe O.L., Thomas C.D. and Moss D. 1996. Spatial synchrony and asynchrony in butterfly population dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 85ā€“95.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Stork N.E., Srivastava D.S., Watt A.D. and Larsen T.B. 2003. Butterfly diversity and silvicultural practice in lowland rainforests of Cameroon. Biodiv. Conserv. 12: 387ā€“410.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tuomisto H., Ruokolainen K. and Yli-Halla M. 2003. Dispersal, Environment, and floristic variation of western amazonian forests. Science 299: 241ā€“244.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Whittaker R.H. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 147: 250ā€“260.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Williams S.E., Marsh H. and Winter J. 2002. Spatial scale, species diversity, and habitat structure: small mammals in Australian tropical rain forest. Ecology 83: 1317ā€“1329.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Willott S.J., Lim D.C., Compton S.G. and Sutton S.L. 2000. Effects of selective logging on the butterflies of a Bornean rainforest. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1055ā€“1065.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cleary, D.F.R., Genner, M.J. (2006). Diversity patterns of Bornean butterfly assemblages. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Arthropod Diversity and Conservation. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5204-0_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics