Skip to main content

Sampling to assess a re-established Appalachian forest in Ohio based on gelechioid moths (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea)

  • Chapter
Arthropod Diversity and Conservation

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 1))

Abstract

A list of microlepidoptera belonging to the superfamily Gelechioidea was produced from June trap samples from sites within the Wayne National Forest (Lawrence County), an Appalachian forest in Southern Ohio that was once a greatly disturbed area and has since re-established over a period of nearly 100 years. The composition and diversity of Lawrence county is compared to lists of gelechioid moths generated by other surveys in the eastern United States: the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, an Ohio study (Summerville and Crist 2003), and unpublished data from Connecticut (Wagner). From comparison with these studies, we address two questions: (1) How well do passive surveys of Gelechioidea compare to more labor intensive surveys? (2) How does the regenerated Wayne National Forest compare to other well documented areas with respect to gelechioid diversity? Our sample of diversity, though more narrow in time and area, compares favorably to more exhaustive sampling and demonstrates that it may be more efficient to focus on target groups in focal localities when time and resources are limited rather than conduct extensive sampling programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adamski D. and Brown R.L. 1989. Morphology and systematics of North American Blastobasidae (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea). Miss. Agric. Forest. Exp. Stat. Tech. Bull. (Mississippi Entomological Museum No. 1) 165: 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamski D. and Hodges R.W. 1996. An annotated list of North American Blastobasinae (Lepidopteran: Gelechioidea: Coleophoridae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 98: 708–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotons L., Monkkonen M. and Martin J.L. 2003. Are fragments islands? Landscape context and density-area relationships in boreal forest birds. Am. Nat. 162: 343–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown K.S. and Freitas A.V.L. 2000. Atlantic forest butterflies: indicators for landscape conservation. Biotropica 32: 34–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covell C.V. 1984. A Field Guide to the Moths of Eastern North America. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries P.J., Murray D. and Lande R. 1997. Species diversity in vertical, horizontal, and temporal dimensions of a fruit-feeding butterfly community in an Ecuadorian rainforest. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 62: 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries P.J. and Walla T.R. 2001. Species diversity and community structure in neotropical fruit-feeding butterflies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 74: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doak P. 2000. Population consequences of restricted dispersal for an insect herbivore in a subdivided habitat. Ecology 81: 1828–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes W.T.M. 1923. Superfamily Gelechioidea. The Lepidoptera of New York and Neighboring States: Primitive Forms Microlepidoptera, Pyraloids Bombycoids. Cornell University, Agricultural Experiment Station, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greller A.M. 1988. Deciduous forests. In: Barbou M.G. and Billings W.D. (eds), North American Terrestrial Vegetation, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY; Cambridge, UKpp. 287–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez D., Leon-Cortes J.L., Menendez R., Wilson R.J., Cowley M.J.R. and Thomas C.D. 2001. Metapopulations of four lepidopteran herbivores on a single host plant, Lotus corniculatus. Ecology 82: 1371–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges R.W. 1974. Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae. In: Dominick R.B., Dominick T., Ferguson D.C., Franclemont J.G., Hodges R.W. and Munroe E.G. (eds), Moths of America North of Mexico. E. W. Classey and The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges R.W. 1978. Gelechioidea (in part): Cosmopterigidae. In: Dominick R.B., Dominick T., Ferguson D.C., Franclemont J.G., Hodges R.W. and Munroe E.G. (eds), Moths of America North of Mexico. E. W. Classey and The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges R.W., Dominick R.B., Dominick T., Ferguson D.C., Franclemont J.G., and Munroe E.G. (eds). 1983. Check List of the Lepidoptera of America North of Mexico Including Greenland. E. W. Classey and The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges R.W. 1985. A new species of Dichomeris from Costa-Rica (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 87: 456–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges R.W. 1986. Gelechioidea: Gelechiidae (part) Dichomeridinae. In: Dominick R.B., Dominick T., Ferguson D.C., Franclemont J.G., Hodges R.W. and Munroe E.G. (eds), Moths of America North of Mexico. E. W. Classey and The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges R.W. 1998. The Gelechioidea. In: Kristensen N.P. (ed.), The Handbook of Zoology/Handbuch der Zoologie. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New Yorkpp. 132–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holl K.D. 1996. The effect of coal surface mine reclamation on diurnal lepidopteran conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr J.T., Southwood T.R.E. and Cihlar J. 2001. Remotely sensed habitat diversity predicts butterfly species richness and community similarity in Canada. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 98: 11365–11370.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching R.L., Orr A.G., Thalib L., Mitchell H., Hopkins M.S. and Graham A.W. 2000. Moth assemblages as indicators of environmental quality in remnants of upland Australian rain forest. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 284–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry J.-F. 1998. Répartition géographique, plantes nourricières et notes taxonomiques sur 29 espèces de Coleophora (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae) au Quebec. Fabreries 23: 25–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • LepÅ¡ J., Spitzer K. and JaroÅ¡ J. 1998. Food plants, species composition and variability of the moth community in undisturbed forest. Oikos 81: 538–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R.H. and Wilson E.O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; Kent, England, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; Kent, England, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muona J. 1999. Trapping beetles in boreal coniferous forest — how many species do we miss? Fennia 77: 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit S., Moilanen A., Hanski I. and Baguette M. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches. Oikos 92: 491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell J., Mitter C. and Farrell B. 1998. Evolution of larval food preferences in Lepidoptera. In: Kristensen N.P. (ed.), The Handbook of Zoology/Handbuch der Zoologie. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New Yorkpp. 403–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston F.W. 1948. The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology 29: 254–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharff N., Coddington J.A., Griswold C.E., Hormiga G. and Bjorn de P. 2003. When to quit? Estimating spider species richness in a northern European deciduous forest. J. Arachnol. Soc. 31: 246–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey M.J. 2001. The All Taxon Biological Inventory of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Fl. Entomol. 84: 556–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørenson L.L., Coddington J.A. and Scharff N. 2002. Inventorying and estimating subcanopy spider diversity using semiquantitative sampling methods in an afromontane forest. Environ. Entomol. 31: 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehr F.W. 1987. Superfamily Gelechioidea. In: Stehr F.W. (ed.), Immature Insects. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IApp. 379–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerville K.S., Boulware M.J., Veech J.A. and Crist T.O. 2003a. Spatial variation in species diversity and composition of forest Lepidoptera in eastern deciduous forests of North America. Conserv. Biol. 17: 1045–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerville K.S. and Crist T.O. 2003. Determinants of lepidopteran community composition and species diversity in eastern deciduous forests: roles of season, eco-region and patch size. Oikos 100: 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerville K.S., Crist T.O., Kahn J.K. and Gerling J.C. 2003b. Community structure of arboreal caterpillars within and among tree species of the eastern deciduous forest. Ecol. Entomol. 28: 747–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland E.K. and Hutchinson T.F. (eds). 2003. Characteristics of mixed-oak forest ecosystems in southern Ohio prior to the reintroduction of fire. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T., Steffan-Dewenter I., Kruess A. and Thies C. 2002. Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol. Res. 17: 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher M.B. and Keiller S.W.J. 1998. The macrolepidoptera of farm woodlands: determinants of diversity and community structure. Biodivers. Conserv. 7: 725–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner D.M. and Scholtens B. 2002. Lepidoptera Blitz nets 860 and counting. ATBI Quart. 3: 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg N., Klemetti T., Selonen V. and Hanski I. 2002. Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies. Oecologia 130: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bucheli, S.R., Horn, D.J., Wenzel, J.W. (2006). Sampling to assess a re-established Appalachian forest in Ohio based on gelechioid moths (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea). In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Arthropod Diversity and Conservation. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5204-0_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics