Skip to main content

Countryside Stewardship Scheme and butterflies: a study of plant and butterfly species richness

  • Chapter
Arthropod Diversity and Conservation

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 1))

  • 1502 Accesses

Abstract

Butterfly and plant species richness were recorded from 1997 to 2000 on 2 and 6 m grass margins created at three farms in Essex which had entered the Countryside Stewardship Scheme (CSS) in October 1996. On both the 2 and 6 m margins there was a significant relationship between the length of hedgerow and the number of plant species observed on the margins, but the seed mixtures used may not have been ideal and natural regeneration should not have been used on the clay soils of Essex. Butterfly species richness was significantly greater on the 2 m margins than on the control sections, and was greater when a higher number of grass species were included in the original seed mixture. Plant species richness was greater on the 6 m margins when established by natural regeneration. CSS grass margins could be improved as butterfly habitats if they are linked to existing habitats such as hedgerows, are sown with a better range of native grasses and herbs and are managed in a way more conducive to wildlife. These changes to the policy of establishment of CSS margins could help combat habitat loss and fragmentation within the countryside.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asher J., Warren M., Fox R., Harding P., Jeffcoate G. and Jeffcoate S. 2001. The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker A.M. and Reynolds C.J. 1999. The value of planted grass field margins as a habitat for sawflies and other chick-food insects. In Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne pp.109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock J. 1996. Plants. In: Sutherland W.J. (ed), Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 111–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buys J.C. 1995. Kansen voor natuur bij braakegging van perceelranden. Akkerranden in Nederland, In: de Snoo G.R., Rotteveel A.J.W. and Heemsbergen H. (eds), Wageningen, pp. 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buys J.C., Oosterveld E.B. and Ellenbroek F.M. 1996. Kansen voor natuur bij braak II verslag van een tweejarig praktijkonderzoek. (No CLM 253-1996). Centrum voor Landbouw en Milieu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carreck N.L., Williams I.H. and Oakley J.N. 1999. Enhancing farmland for insect pollinators using flower mixtures. In Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp. 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling D.W. and Lockyer D.R. 1968. A comparison of the yield of three grass species at various levels of nitrogenous fertiliser grown alone or in a mixture. Journal of Agricultural Science 71:127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Snoo G.R. and Udo de Haes H.A. 1994. Onbespoten akkerranden voor natuur, milieu en bedrijf. Landschap 11(4): 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover J.W. 1994. Arable Field Margins: factors affecting butterfly distribution and abundance. In: Boatman N. (ed.), BCPC Monograph no 58, Field Margins: Integrating agriculture and conservation. British Crop Protection Council, Warwick, pp. 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover J.W. 1999. Butterflies and field margins. In Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne pp.109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn O.J. 1964. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6: 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English Nature 1995. Rebuilding the English Countryside. English Nature, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feber R.H. and Smith H. 1995. Butterfly conservation on arable farmland. In: Pullen A.S. (ed.), Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feber R.H., Smith H. and Macdonald D.W. 1994. The effects of field margin restoration on the Meadow Brown butterfly (Maniola jurtina). In: Boatman N. (ed.), BCPC Monograph no 58, Field Margins: Integrating agriculture and conservation. British Crop Protection Council, Warwick, pp. 295–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feber R.H., Smith H. and MacDonald D.W. 1996. The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 1191–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field R.G. 2002. A study of butterflies on Farmland. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Essex, Colchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins A. and Feber R.E. 1997. Management for plant and butterfly species diversity on organically farmed grassland field margins. In Management for grassland diversity. Proceedings of International. Symposium of the European Grassland Federation, pp.69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham F.W., Sherwood A.J., Oakley J.N. and Fielder A.G. 1999. Botanical composition and invertebrate populations in sown grass and wildflower margins. In Aspects of Applied Biology 54, Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp.291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Luken J.O. 1990. Directing Ecological Succession. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAFF 1999. The Countryside Stewardship Scheme: Information and how to apply. MAFF, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAFF 2000. Agricultural Statistics in Great Britain in 1999. MAFF, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall E.J.P 1998. Guidelines for the siting, establishment and management of arable field margins, beetle banks, cereal conservation headlands and wildlife seed mixtures. Issue no 2. IACR, Long Ashton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall E.J.P., Baudry J., Moonen C., Fevre E. and Thomas C.F.G. 1996. Factors affecting the floral diversity in European field margins networks. In: Simpson I. and Dennis P. (eds), The Spatial Dynamics of Biodiversity Proceedings 5th Annual IALE (UK) Conference. IALE, UK, pp. 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall E.J.P. and Moonen C. 1998. A Review of Field Margin Conservation Strips in Europe. IACR, Long Ashton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall E.J.P. and Nowakowski M. 1995. Successional changes in the flora of a sown field margin strip managed by cutting and herbicide application. Brighton Crop Protection Conference — Weeds. BCPC, Farnham, pp. 973–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy D.D., Launer A.E. and Ehrlich P.R. 1983. The role of adult feeding in egg production and population dynamics of the checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha). Oecologica 56: 257–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E. 1977. A method for assessing the abundance of butterflies. Biological Conservation 12:115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E. and Yates T. 1993. Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith H., Feber R.E., Johnson P.J., McCallum K., Jensen S.P., Younes M. and MacDonald D.W. 1993. The Conservation Management of Arable Field Margins. English Nature, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith H., Feber R.E. and MacDonald D.W. 1994. The role of wildflower seed mixtures in field margin restoration. In: Boatman N. (ed.), BCPC Monograph no 58, Field Margins: Integrating agriculture and conservation. British Crop Protection Council, Warwick, pp. 289–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith H., Feber R.E. and MacDonald D.W. 1999. Sown field margins: why stop at grass? In: Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones Ecology, Management and Policy. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp.291–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith H., McCallum K. and MacDonald D.W. 1997. Experimental comparison of the nature conservation value, productivity and ease of management of a conventional and a more species-rich grass ley. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spedding C.R.W. and Diekmahns E.W. 1972. Grasses and Legumes in British Agriculture. Bulletin of the Commonwealth Bureau of Pasture and Field Crops No. 49. Royal Commonwealth Agriculture Bureau, Farnham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J.A. 1984. The Conservation of Butterflies in Temperate Countries: Past efforts and lessons for the future. In: The Biology of Butterflies. Sypm. of the Royal Entomological Society of London 11: 333–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren M.S. 1992. Butterfly populations. In: Dennis R.L.H. (ed.), The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt W.B., Hoch P.C. and Mills S.G. 1974. Nectar resource use by Colias butterflies. Oecologia 14:353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West T.M. and Marshall E.J.P. 1996. Managing sown flower margin strips on contrasted soil types in three Environmentally Sensitive Areas. In Aspects of Applied Biology, 44, Vegetation Management in Forestry, Amenity and Conservation Areas. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp. 269–276

    Google Scholar 

  • West T.M., Marshall E.J.P, Westbury D.B. and Arnold G.M. 1999. Vegetation development on sown and unsown field boundary strips established in three Environmentally Sensitive Areas. In Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp. 235–240

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. G. Field .

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Field, R.G., Gardiner, T., Mason, C.F., Hill, J. (2006). Countryside Stewardship Scheme and butterflies: a study of plant and butterfly species richness. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Arthropod Diversity and Conservation. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5204-0_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics