Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Arthropod Diversity and Conservation pp 319–345Cite as

Richness, abundance, and complementarity of fruit-feeding butterfly species in relict sacred forests and forest reserves of Ghana

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 1))

Abstract

Sacred forest groves in Ghana are centuries old protected areas that were once part of continuous forest cover but now mostly exist as relict forest patches embedded in an agropastoral landscape. We conducted a year-long survey of the fruit-feeding butterfly fauna of four sacred groves and two forest reserves in the moist semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana to characterize resident species diversity and complementarity among communities. Joint analysis of frugivorous butterfly diversity at these six forest fragments, which ranged in size from 6 to 5000 ha, was used to evaluate the conservation potential of these ancient indigenous reserves. A total of 6836 individuals were trapped across all sites, representing 79 species and five subfamilies. Community diversity was characterized in terms of, (a) number of species accumulated versus sampling effort, (b) rarefied species richness, (c) nonparametric richness estimates, (d) species evenness, (e) Simpson’s Index of Diversity, and (f) complementarity of communities. Diversity of the fruit-feeding butterfly communities, quantified in terms of both species evenness and rarefied species richness, was higher at the larger forest reserves than at the small sacred forest groves. Additionally, although all sites had species trapped only at that site, the 5000-ha forest reserve harbored a resident community that was clearly distinctive from and more diverse than the other communities including the other forest reserve. Hence, our findings add to the burgeoning body of data that indicates large reserves are the foundation of successful conservation programs. Nonetheless, we found these small forest patches contribute to biodiversity conservation in at least three ways and these are identified and discussed. We also identify a number of species that appear more or less vulnerable to dynamics of forest fragmentation based on changes in their relative abundance across sites and we interpret these data in the context of potential indicator species and theoretical predictions of at-risk species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andre H.M., Lebrun P. and Noti M-I. 1992. Biodiversity in Africa: a plea for more data. Journal of African Zoology 106: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierregaard R.O. Jr., Lovejoy T.E., Kapos V., dos Santos A.A and Hutchings R.W. 1992. The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments. BioScience 42: 859–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossart J.L. and Carlton C.E. 2002. Insect conservation in America: status and perspectives. American Entomologist 48: 82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossart J.L., Opuni-Frimpong E., Kuudaar S. and Nkrumah E. 2005. Fruit-feeding butterfly communities of Ghana: survey completeness and correlates of spatial diversity. In: Huber B.G., Sinclair B.J. and Lampe K-H. (eds), African Biodiversity: Molecules, Organisms, Ecosystems. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Tropical Biology. Museum Koenig, Springer Verlag, Bonn, Germany, pp. 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown K.S. 1997. Diversity, disturbance, and sustainable use of neotropical forests: insects as indicators for conservation monitoring. Journal of Insect Conservation 1: 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon R.L., Colwell R.K., Denslow J.S. and Guariguata M.R. 1996. Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forests of NE Costa Rica. In: Dalmeier F. and Comiskey J.A. (eds), Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modeling: Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies. Parthenon Publishing, Paris, pp. 289–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell R.K. 2000. EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 6.0b1. User’s Guide and application published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell R.K. and Coddington J.A. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B 345: 101–118.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connor E.F. and McCoy E.D. 1979. The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. American Naturalist 113: 791–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily G.C. and Ehrlich P.R. 1995. Preservation of biodiversity in small rainforest patches, rapid evaluations using butterfly trapping. Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Abrera B. 1981. Butterflies of the Afrotropical Region. Landsdowne Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Abrera B. 1997. Butterflies of the Afrotropical Region, Part 1: Papilionidae, Pieridae, Acraeidae, Danaidae, Satyridae. Hill House Publishers, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Abrera B. 2001. The Concise Atlas of Butterflies of the World. Hill House Publishers, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries P. 1988. Stratification of fruit-feeding nymphalid butterflies in a Cost Rican rainforest. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 26: 98–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries P., Murray D. and Lande R. 1997. Species diversity in vertical, horizontal, and temporal dimensions of a fruit-feeding butterfly community in an Ecuadorian rainforest. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 62: 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVries P., Walla T.R. and Greeney H.F. 1999. Species diversity in spatial and temporal dimensions of fruit-feeding butterflies from two Ecuadorian rainforests. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68: 333–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmel T.C. and Larsen T.B. 1997. Butterfly diversity in Ghana, West Africa. Tropical Lepidoptera 8(supplement 3): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO 1999. Second Interim Report on the State of Tropical Forests by Forest Resources Assessment 1990 Project. Tenth World Forestry Congress, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermon H., Waltert M., Larsen T.B., Dall’Asta U. and Muhlenberg M. 2000. Effects of forest management on diversity and abundance of fruit-feeding Nymphalid butterflies in south-eastern Cote d’Ivoire. Journal of Insect Conservation 4: 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fermon H., Waltert M. and Muhlenberg M. 2003. Movement and vertical stratification of fruitfeeding butterflies in a managed West African rainforest. Journal of Insect Conservation 7: 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J. and Lindenmayer D.B. 2002. Small patches can be valuable for biodiversity conservation: two case studies on birds in southeastern Australia. Biological Conservation 106: 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GACON. Jachie Sacred Grove. Ghana Association for the Conservation of Nature in cooperation with the Global Environmental Facility. Unknown publication date.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher E. 1999. COMPAH Documentation. User’s Guide and application published at: http://www.es.umb.edu/edgwebp.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J. 1998. Rarity as double jeopardy. Nature 394: 229–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli N.J. and Colwell R.K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli N.J. and Entsminger G.L. 2003. EcoSim: Null Models Software for Ecology. Version 7. Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear, Burlington, VT. http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie A. 2000. The Human Impact on the Natural Environment. 5th edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall J.B. and Swain M.D. 1981. Distribution and Ecology of Vascular Plants in a Tropical Rain Forest: Forest Vegetation of Ghana. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer K.C., Hill J.K., Mustaffa B.N., Sherratt T.N., Maryati M. and Chey V.K. 2003. Ecology of butterflies in natural and selectively logged forests of northern Borneo: the importance of habitat heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I. and Gilpin M. 1996. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A. and Harrison S. 1994. Metapopulation dynamics and genetics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25: 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne W.D. 1988. The flora and vegetation of Ghana’s forests. In: Ghana Forest Inventory Proceedings. Overseas Dev. Agency/Ghana Forestry Dept, Accra, pp. 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne W.D. and Abu-Juam M. 1995. Forest Protection in Ghana with Particular Reference to Vegetation and Plant Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck K.L. Jr., Van Belle G. and Simberloff D. 1975. Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of sufficient sample size. Ecology 56: 1459–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecq J. 1997. Euphaedra. Lambillionea, Tervuren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecq J. 1999. Euphaedra. In: Bauer E. and Frankenbach T. (eds), Butterflies of the World, Part 4, Nymphalidae III. Goeke and Evers, Keltern, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecq J. 2000. Bebearia. In: Bauer E. and Frankenbach T. (eds), Butterflies of the World, Part 9, Nymphalidae IV. Goeke and Evers, Keltern, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecq J. 2002. Euriphene. In: Bauer E. and Frankenbach T. (eds), Butterflies of the World, Part 15, Nymphalidae VI. Goeke and Evers, Keltern, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning S.F. 1988. The Charaxinae Butterflies of Africa. Aloe Books, Capetown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J.K., Hamer K.C., Tangah J. and Dawood M. 2001. Ecology of tropical butterflies in rainforest gaps. Oecologia 128: 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C.N. 1998. Species extinction and the relationship between distribution and abundance. Nature 394: 272–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs C.J. 1999. Ecological Methodology. Addison-Welsey, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C. 1992. Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecological Applications 2: 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunin W.E. and Gaston K. 1997. The Biology of Rarity: Causes and Consequences of Rare-common Differences. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241: 1455–1469.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen T.B. 1994. The Butterflies of Ghana — Their Implications for Conservation and Sustainable Use. Report to IUCN and Dept. of Game & Wildlife, Ghana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen T.B. 2001. The Butterflies of Ankasa/Nini-Suhien and Bia Protected Area Systems in Western Ghana. Protected areas development programme. Western Region Ghana. ULG Northumbrian Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen T.B. 2005. Butterflies of West Africa. Apollo Books, Svendborg, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance W.F. 1997. Introduction. In: Laurance W.F. and Bierregaard R.O. Jr. (eds), Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance W.F., Ferreira L.V., Rankin-de Merona J.M. and Laurance S.G. 1998. Rain forest fragmentation and the dynamics of Amazonian tree communities. Ecology 79: 7032–7040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebbie A.R. and Freudenberger M.S. 1996. Sacred groves in Africa: forest patches in transition. In: Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes. Island Press, Washington, D.C, pp. 300–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino J.T., Coddington J. and Colwell R.K. 2002. The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology 83: 689–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R.H. and Wilson E.O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran A. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • May R.M. and Stumpf M.P.H. 2000. Species-area relations in tropical forests. Science 290: 2084.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murcia C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N. 1990. The biodiversity challenge: expanded hot-spot analysis. The Environmentalist 10: 243–256.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., da Fonseca G.A.B. and Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ntiamoa-Baidu T. 2001. Indigenous versus introduced biodiversity conservation strategies: the case of protected area systems in Ghana. In: Weber W., White L.J.T., Vedder A. and Naughton-Treves L. (eds), in African Rain Forest Ecology & Conservation. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen D.F. 1971. Tropical Butterflies: The Ecology and Behaviour of Butterflies in the Tropics with Special Reference to African Species. Clarendon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis A. and Hector A. 2000. Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405: 212–219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz D. 1981. Seven forms of rarity. In: Synge H. (eds), The Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation. Wiley, New York, pp. 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig M.L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc 1990. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener T.W. 1976. The species-area relationship within archipelagoes: models and evidence from island birds. Proceedings of the XVI International Ornithological Congress 6: 629–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahabuddin G. and Terborgh J.W. 1999. Frugivorous butterflies in Venezuelan forest fragments: abundance, diversity and the effects of isolation. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15: 703–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D. 1978. Use of rarefaction and related methods in ecology. In: Dickson K.L., Cairns J. Jr. and Livingston R.J. (eds), Biological Data in Water Pollution Assessment: Quantitative and Statistical Analyses. Am. Soc. Testing Materials, Philadelphia, pp 150–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner K.E. 2000. Past, present, and future of rangeland grasshopper management. Rangelands 22: 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood T.R.E. and Henderson P.A. 2000. Ecological Methodology. Oxford, Blackwell Science Ltd, 464 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stork N.E., Srivastava D.S., Watt A.D. and Larsen T.B. 2003. Butterfly diversity and silvicultural practice in lowland rainforests of Cameroon. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 387–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi M. 1993. Species abundance patterns and community structure. Advances in Ecology Research 24: 112–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T., Steffan-Dewenter I., Kruess A. and Carsten T. 2002. Contribution of small habitat fragments to conservation of insect communities of grassland — cropland landscapes. Ecological Application 12: 354–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner I.M. 1996. Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO 2003. The Importance of Sacred Natural Sites for Biodiversity Conservation. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij G.J. 1993. Biogeography of recently extinct marine species: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 7: 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M.R. and Cobbinah J.R. 1993. Deforestation and sustainability in Ghana: the role of tropical forests. Journal of Forestry 6: 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore T.C. 1997. Tropical forest disturbance, disappearance, and species loss. In: Laurance W.F. and Bierregaaard R.O. Jr. (eds), Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore T.C. 1998. An Introduction to Tropical Rain Forests. 2nd ed.. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willot S.J., Lim D.C., Compton S.G. and Sutton S.L. 2000. Effects of selective logging on the butterflies of a Bornean rainforest. Conservation Biology 14: 1055–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H. 1981. Similarity indices, sample size, and diversity. Oecologia 50: 296–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. E. Opuni-Frimpong

    Present address: School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan, Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Biology & Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN, 47803, USA

    J. L. Bossart

  2. Forestry Research Institute of Ghana, Kumasi, Ghana

    E. Opuni-Frimpong, S. Kuudaar & E. Nkrumah

Authors
  1. J. L. Bossart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Opuni-Frimpong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Kuudaar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Nkrumah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bossart, J.L., Opuni-Frimpong, E., Kuudaar, S., Nkrumah, E. (2006). Richness, abundance, and complementarity of fruit-feeding butterfly species in relict sacred forests and forest reserves of Ghana. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Arthropod Diversity and Conservation. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5204-0_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation