Advertisement

Urban Schools: Performance, Competition and Collaboration

  • Philip A. Wood
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 19)

This chapter briefly sets current educational policy on urban education in England in the context of policy developments over the past 25 years, highlighting certain continuities and disjunctures in the journey from Thatcherism to contemporary New Labour. (For a broader discussion of the history of education in the UK, see McCulloch, 2007.) It then examines approaches to urban education through a consideration of competition and collaboration as interlinked dimensions of the Department for Education and Skill’s (DfES’s) diversity policy. Discussion is illustrated by reference to specific programs tried or currently in operation.

Keywords

Education Policy Competitive Pressure Diversity Policy Specialist School School Improvement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adnett, P., & Davies, N. (2003). Schooling reforms in England: From quasi-markets to co-opetition? Journal of Education Policy, 18(4), 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagley, C. (2006). School choice and competition: A public-market in education revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 32(3), 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J. (2005). Standards in education: Privatisation, profit and values. In S. J. Ball (Ed.), Education Policy and Social Class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bartlett, D., & Dibben, P. (2002). Public sector innovation and entrepreneurship: Case studies from local government. Local Government Studies, 28(4), 107–121.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, K., & West, A. (2003). Specialist schools: An exploration of competition and co-operation. Educational Studies, 29(3), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blair, T. (1998). The third way: New politics for the new century. London: The Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  8. Bottery, M. (2005). The challenges of educational leadership. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Brandenberger, A., & Nalebuff, B. (1997). Co-opetition. London: Harper Collins Business.Google Scholar
  10. Brighouse, T. (2002). Comprehensive schools then, now and in the future – is it time to draw a line in the sand and create a new ideal? The Caroline Benn Memorial Lecture, Institute of Education, University of London, 28th September 2002.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, P., Adnett, N., & Mangan, J. (2002). The diversity and dynamics of competition: Evidence from two local schooling markets. Oxford Review of Education, 28(1), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DfES. (2001). White paper schools – achieving success. London: DfES.Google Scholar
  13. DfES. (2003). London challenge: Transforming London secondary schools. London: DfES.Google Scholar
  14. DfES. (2004a). Every child matters: Next steps. London: DfES.Google Scholar
  15. DfES. (2004b). Five year strategy for children and learners: Putting people at the heart of public services. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  16. DfES. (2005a). Higher standards, better schools for all: More choice for parents and pupils. London: DfES.Google Scholar
  17. DfES. (2005b). Education improvement partnerships. London: DfES.Google Scholar
  18. Evans, J., Castle, F., Cooper, D., Glatter, R., & Woods, P. A. (2005). Collaboration: The big new idea for school improvement? Journal of Education Policy, 20(2), 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fitz, J., Taylor, C., & Gorard, S. (2002). Local education authorities and the regulation of educational markets: Four case studies. Research Papers in Education, 17(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gewirtz, S., Ball, S., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  22. Giddens, A. (2000). The third way and its critics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  23. Giddens, A., & Diamond, P. (2005). The new egalitarianism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  24. Gillborn, D. (2007). Combating racism in schooling: A critical perspective on contemporary policy and practice. In W. T. Pink, & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), International handbook of urban education (pp. 979–1006). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Glatter, R., Castle, F., Cooper, D., Evans, F., & Woods, P. A. (2005). What's New? Identifying innovation arising from school collaboration initiatives. Educational Management Administration Leadership, 33(4), 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldstein, H., & Noden, P. (2003). Modelling social segregation. Oxford Review of Education, 29(2), 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldstein, H., & Noden, P. (2004). A response to Gorard on social segregation. Oxford Review of Education, 30(3), 441–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gorard, S. (1999). ‘Well. That about wraps it up for school choice research’: A state of the art review. School Leadership & Management, 19(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gorard, S. (2004). Comments on “Modelling social segregation” by Goldstein and Noden. Oxford Review of Education, 30(3), 435–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gorard, S. (2005). Academies as the “future of schooling”: Is this an evidence-based policy? Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halpin, D., Dickson, M., Power, S., Whitty, G., & Gewirtz, S. (2004). Area-based approaches to educational regeneration: The case of the english education action zone experiment. Policy Studies, 25(2), 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hentschke, G. C, & Caldwell, B. (2005). Entrepreneurial leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 145–159). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Jesson, D. (2003). Educational outcomes and value added by specialist schools. London: Technology Colleges Trust.Google Scholar
  34. Jesson, D. (2004). Educational outcomes and value added by specialist schools. London: Technology Colleges Trust.Google Scholar
  35. Kelly, R. (2005). Foreword, in DfES, Department for education and skills response to the second annual report from the pricewaterhousecoopers evaluation of the academies programme. London: DfES.Google Scholar
  36. Levacic, R. (1999). New labour education policy in the United Kingdom: The third way. Jolimont, Victoria, Australia: Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria.Google Scholar
  37. Levacic, R., & Hardman, J. (1999). The performance of grant maintained schools in England: An experiment in autonomy. Journal of Education Policy, 14(2), 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levacic, R., & Jenkins, A. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of specialist schools. London: Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  39. Levacic, R., & Woods, P. A. (2000). Quasi-markets and school performance: Evidence from a study of English secondary schools. In M. Weiss, & H. Weishaug (Eds.), Bildungsoekonomie und Neue Steurung (pp. 53–95). Frankfurt: LangGoogle Scholar
  40. Levacic, R., Woods, P. A., Hardman, J., & Woods, G. J. (1998). Responses to competitive pressures on secondary schools: Headteachers'perceptions. Milton Keynes: Centre for Educational Policy and Management, Open University.Google Scholar
  41. Lucey, H., & Reay, D. (2002a). A market in waste: Psychic and structural dimensions of school-choice policy in the UK and children's narratives of “demonized” schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 23(3), 254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lucey, H., & Reay, D. (2002b). Carrying the beacon of excellence: Social class differentiation and anxiety at a time of transition. Journal of Education Policy, 17(3), 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Macbeath, A., McCreath, D., & Aitchison, J. (1995). Competition, Collaboration and Possible Futures. In A. Macbeath, D. McCreath, & J. Aitchison (Eds.), Collaborate or Compete? (pp. 1–15). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  44. Machin, S., McNally, S., & Meghir, C. (2004). Improving pupil performance in english secondary schools: Excellence in cities. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2–3), 396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCulloch, G. (2007). History of urban education in the United Kingdom. In W. T. Pink, & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), International handbook of urban education (pp. 943–958). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Ofsted. (2003). Excellence in cities and education action zones: Management and impact. London: Ofsted.Google Scholar
  47. Office for National Statistics. (2004). Social inequalities. London: Office for Naional Statistics.Google Scholar
  48. Office for National Statistics. (2005). Social Trends, No. 35. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. New York, Penguin.Google Scholar
  50. Penney, D. (2004). Policy tensions being played out in practice. The Specialist Schools initiative in England. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 2(1). Available: http://www.jceps.com/index.php?pageID=article&articleID=26
  51. Power, S., & Whitty, G. (1999). New labour's education policy: First, second or third way? Journal of Education Policy, 14(5), 535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reay, D., & Lucey, H. (2004). Stigmatised choices: Social class, social exclusion and secondary school markets in the inner city. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12(1), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reid, I., & Brain, K. (2003). Education action zones: Mission impossible? International Studies in Sociology of Education, 13(2), 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Riddell, R. (2007). Urban learning and the need for varied urban curricula and pedagogies. In W. T. Pink, & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), International handbook of urban education (pp. 1027–1048). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven and London: Yale University.Google Scholar
  56. Taylor, C. (2001). Hierarchies and “local” markets: The geography of the “lived” market place in secondary education provision. Journal of Education Policy, 16(3), 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor, C., Fitz, J., & Gorard, S. (2005). Diversity, specialisation and equity in education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(1), 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tett, L. (2007). Multi-agency working in urban education and social justice. In W. T. Pink, & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), International handbook of urban education (pp. 1139–1156). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. West-Burnham, J. (2003). Education, leadership and the community. In T. Gelsthorpe, & J. West-Burnham (Eds.), Educational leadership and the community: Strategies for school improvement through community engagement. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  60. Woods, G. J., & Woods, P. A. (2005). At the hard edge of change: Views from secondary head teachers on a public-private partnership. Journal of Education Policy, 20(1), 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Woods, P. A. (2002). Space for Idealism? Politics and Education in the United Kingdom. Educational Policy, 16(1), 118–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Woods, P. A. (2005). Democratic leadership in education. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Woods, P. A., & Bagley, C. (1996). Market elements in a public service: An analytical model for studying educational policy. Journal of Education Policy, 11(6), 641–653.Google Scholar
  64. Woods, P. A. & Levacic, R. (2002). Raising school performance in the league tables (Part 2): Barriers to responsiveness in three disadvantaged schools. British Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Woods, P. A. & Woods, G. J. (2004). Modernizing leadership through private participation: A marriage of inconvenience with public ethos? Journal of Education Policy, 19(6), 643–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Woods, P. A., Bagley, C., & Glatter, R. (1998). School choice and competition: Markets in the public interest? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Woods, P. A., Woods, G. J., & Gunter, H. (2007). Academy schools and entrepreneurialism in education. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Woods, P. A., Castle, F., Cooper, D., Evans, F., Levacic, R., & Glatter, R. (2005). “Deep collaboration: Developing new collaborative relationships amongst schools in a time of specialisation and diversity.” Paper presented at Annual Conference of British Educational Research Association, University of Glamorgan, 15–17 September.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip A. Wood
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Education, University of AberdeenU.K.

Personalised recommendations