Advertisement

Urban Education in the United Kingdom: Section Editors' Introduction

  • Carol Campbell
  • Geoff Whitty
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 19)

For over 100 years researchers have pointed to the damaging effects on education of the particular combinations and concentrations of social and economic disadvantage experienced in urban contexts. However, urban education studies as a specific field of inquiry emerged in the United Kingdom (UK) during the late 1960s. It was partly influenced by the developing field in the United States and the perceived “crisis” of education in cities, but also framed to a greater degree than in the United States by critical perspectives drawn from the emerging “new sociology of education” (Young, 1971).

The contributions to this section of the Handbook explore the perception, interpretation and implications of the current urban education “crisis” and the assumptions underlying it. They seek to engage critically and constructively with the pressing research and policy agenda, but in a manner which questions “present crisis” and “quick fix” solutions (Reeder, 1992). This is consistent with Grace’s (1984) “critical scholarship” approach, involving “empirical enquiry in urban education which, at its best, is historically and theoretically situated on the one hand and generative of critical action on the other.” This he contrasted with other approaches that tend to “provide only a contextual rhetoric of the urban rather than a substantive emphasis upon it” and to produce “school-centred solutions with no sense of the structural, the political and the historical as constraints” (Grace, 1984, p. xii).

Keywords

Education Policy Urban School School Improvement Urban Context Labour Government 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, D. (2003). Access and achievement in urban education: Ten years on, keynote speech by David Bell, Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools, Fabian Society, London.Google Scholar
  3. Castells, M. (1978). City, class and power. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  4. Castells, M. (1980). The economic crisis and the American city. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (1997). The Urban question: A Marxist approach. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  6. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Department for Education and Employment. (1999). Excellence in Cities. London: DfEE.Google Scholar
  8. Department for Education and Skills. (2003). The London Challenge: Transforming London secondary schools. Nottingham: DfES.Google Scholar
  9. Fantini, M. D., & Weinstein, G. (1973). “What is urban about an urban school?” In J. Raynor, & J. Harden (Eds.), Equality and city schools (pp.150–161). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  10. Gewirtz, S., Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Grace, G. (1984). Education and the City: Theory, history and contemporary practice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  13. Hill, P. T. (1998). Fixing urban schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  14. House of Commons Education and Skills Committee. (2006). The schools White Paper: Higher standards, better schools for all. First Report of Session 2005–2006. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, M. (1999). Failing school, failing city: The reality of inner city education. Charlbury: Jon Carpenter.Google Scholar
  16. Keating, M. (1991). Comparative Urban Politics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, Harvey.Google Scholar
  17. Kelly, R. (2005). Education and Social Progress. Keynote speech by Ruth Kelly, Secretary of State for Education and Skills. Institute for Public Policy Research, London. http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/speeches/speech.cfm?SpeechID=242 <http://education.guardian.co.uk/elearning/story/0,10577,936712,00.html>
  18. Lupton, R. (2004). Schools in disadvantaged areas: Recognising context and raising quality, CASE Paper 76. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  19. Lupton, R. (2005). Social justice and school improvement: Improving the quality of schooling in the poorest neighbourhoods. British Educational Research Journal, 31(5), 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miron, L. F., & St. John, E. P. (Eds.). (2003). Reinterpreting urban school reform. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mortimore, P., & Whitty, G. (1997). Can school improvement overcome the effects of disadvantage? London: Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
  22. Office for Standards in Education. (1993). Access and achievement in urban education. London: Ofsted.Google Scholar
  23. Office for Standards in Education. (2000). Improving City Schools. http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/assets/555.pdf
  24. Office for Standards in Education. (2003). Access and achievement in urban education: Ten year anniversary. London: Ofsted.Google Scholar
  25. Pahl, R. E. (1975). Whose city? Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  26. Park, R., & Burgess, E. (1967). The city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Reeder, D. A. (1992). “History, education and the city: A review of trends in Britain.” In R. K. Goodenow, & W. E. Marsden (Eds.), The city and education in four nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rex, J., & Moore, R. (1967). Race, community and conflict: A study of Sparkbrook. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Whitty, G. (1986). “Education Policy and the Inner Cities”. In P. Lawless, & C. Raban (Eds.), The contemporary british city. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  30. Whitty, G. (1990). “The New Right and the National Curriculum: State Control or Market Forces?” In M. Flude, & M. Hammer (Eds.), The Education Reform Act 1988. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  31. Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Young, M. F. D. (Ed.). (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol Campbell
    • 1
  • Geoff Whitty
    • 2
  1. 1.Formally Institute of Education, University of LondonU.K.
  2. 2.Institute of Education, University of LondonU.K.

Personalised recommendations