Rebuilding Schools, Restoring Communities: A Vision of Urban Educational Evaluation

  • Rodney K. Hopson
  • Jennifer C. Greene
  • Katrina L. Bledsoe
  • Trinidad M. Villegas
  • Tanya A. Brown
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 19)

Our vision of evaluation for urban education contexts is indeed multi-dimensional and expansive. Such a vision is respectful of the complexity and heterogeneity of urban settings in North America, and it offers multiple spaces for reconstituting this complexity in more democratic ways. Our vision of urban educational evaluation, that is, aims both to respect the multiplicity and diversity of life experiences and values that comprise urban communities, as well as to encourage and promote meaningful engagement with experiences, activities, and policies that serve democratic values of voice and empowerment, justice and equity. The vision is thus ideological – but so are all conceptions of evaluation (Greene, 1997). Yet, it is driven not by its ideological character but rather by its commitment to respectfully engage with the complex contours and dynamics of educational interactions and activities within urban school communities.

So, to understand our vision for evaluation in the dynamic urban educational settings of North America inevitably means understanding how evaluation is framed alongside notions of democracy, social change, and social justice within our contemporary society. Additionally, this vision is shaped by our interdisciplinary interests in educational, public health, and social policy and prevention efforts among all communities, especially those of color who tend to be most often marginalized, are immigrant, and may also be bilingual or multilingual. The chapter begins with insights from selected theoretical underpinnings that help us make sense of evaluation in urban educational settings. The chapter then considers major trends in urban education as it simultaneously problematizes how urban education is defined and perceived in North America with primary attention on the U.S. Snapshots of the unique experiences of evaluation in urban educational contexts and settings of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Illinois are presented, followed by an elaboration of our vision for urban educational evaluation. Overall, the chapter strives to advance a character of urban education and a vision for urban education through evaluation that values and privileges the creation of more equitable educational relationships and spaces.


Social Capital Civic Engagement Urban School Evaluation Team Civic Action 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abma, T. (2006). The social relations of evaluation. In I. Shaw, J. Greene, & M. Mark (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Agar, M. (2000). Border lessons: Linguistic “rich points” and evaluative understanding. In R. K. Hopson (Ed.), How and why language matters in evaluation (pp. 93–109). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Apple, M. W. (2004). Doing things the “Right” way: Legitimating educational inequalities in conservative times. In J. Satterthwaite, E. Atkinson, & W. Martin (Eds.), Educational counter-cultures: Confrontations, images, vision (pp. 3–18). Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  4. Baugh, J. (2000). Beyond ebonics: Linguistic pride and racial prejudice. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, M. O., & Copeland-Carson J. [Eds.]. (2005). Creating evaluation anthropology: Introducing an emerging subfield. National Association for the Practice of Anthropology Bulletin No. 24. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, C. W., & Christie, C. A. (2005). Evaluating parent empowerment: A look at the potential of social justice evaluation in education. Teachers College Record, 107(10), 2248–2274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foster, M. (1995). African American teachers and culturally relevant pedagogy. In J. A. Banks, & C. A. McGee-Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education. NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Freire, P. (1970). Education for critical consciousness. NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  9. Gay, G. (1988). Designing relevant curricula for diverse learners. Education and Urban Society, 20(4), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ginwright, S., & James, T. (2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. New Directions for Youth Development, 96, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gordon, E., Miller, F., & David, R. (1990). Coping with communicentric bias in social sciences. Educational Researcher, 19, 14–19.Google Scholar
  12. Grace, G. (1994). Urban education and the culture of contentment: The politics, culture, and economics of inner-city schooling. In P. S. Nelly (Ed.), Education in urban areas: Cross-national dimensions (pp. 45–59). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  13. Greene, J. C. (1997). Education as advocacy. Evaluation Practice, 18, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greene, J. C. (2003). War and peace …$$$ and evaluation. In O. Karlsson (Ed.), Studies in educational policy and philosophy, (2). Sweden: Uppsala University ( Scholar
  15. Greene, J. C. (2005). Evaluators as stewards of the public good. In S. Hood, R. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), The role of culture and cultural context in evaluation: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 7–20). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  16. Greene, J. C., Millett, R. A., & Hopson, R. K. (2004). Evaluation as a democratizing practice. In M. T. Braverman, N. A. Constantine, & J. K. Slater, (Eds.), Foundations and evaluation: Contexts and practices for effective philanthropy (pp. 96–118). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Hajnal, Z. L. (1995). The nature of concentrated urban poverty in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 20(4), 497–528.Google Scholar
  18. Hanberger, A. (2001). Policy and program evaluation, civil society, and democracy. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(2), 211–228.Google Scholar
  19. Harrigan, P. J. (1986). A comparative perspective on recent trends in the history of education in Canada. History of Education Quarterly, 26(1), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill, J. H. (1998). Language, race, and white public space. American Anthropologist, 100, 680–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill, J. H. (2001). The racializing function of language panics. In R. D. Gonzales, & I. Melis (Eds.), Language ideologies: Critical perspectives on the official English movement (pp. 245–267). Urbana, IL: National Council for the Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  22. Hilliard, A. G. (1977). Equal educational opportunity and quality education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 9(2), 110–126.Google Scholar
  23. Hood, S. (2001). Nobody knows my name: In praise of African American evaluators who were responsive. New directions in evaluation (Vol. 92). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Hopson, R. K. (2001). Global and local conversations on culture, diversity, and social justice in evaluation: Issues to consider in a 9/11 era. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 375–380.Google Scholar
  25. Hopson, R. K. (2003). Overview of multicultural and culturally competent program evaluation: Issues, challenges and opportunities. Woodland Hills, CA: The California Endowment.Google Scholar
  26. Hopson, R. K. (2005). Commentary: Reinventing Evaluation. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(3), 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. House, E. (2004). Democracy and evaluation. Keynote presentation to the European Evaluation Society, Berlin, 2 October.Google Scholar
  28. HR 4437 House Resolution 4437. The Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. Library of Congress Thomas homepage Accessed May 24, 2006,
  29. Irvine, J. J., & York, D. E. (1995). Learning styles and culturally diverse students: A literature review. In J. A. Banks, & C. A. McGee-Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 484–497). NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Katz, M. B. (1989). The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare. NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  31. Kincheloe, J. L. (2004). Why a book on urban education? In S. R. Steinberg, & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), 19 Urban questions: Teaching in the city (pp. 1–27). NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  32. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). Dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't think of an elephant!: Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Leacock, E. (1977). Race and the “we-they dichotomy” in culture and classroom. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 8(2), 152–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacLure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Buckingham: Open University.Google Scholar
  36. Mathison, S. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Mercer, J. (1995). Canadian cities and their immigrants: New realities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 538, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mertens, D. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Mirón, L. F. (1996). The social construction of urban schooling: Situating the crisis. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  40. Mirón, L. F., & St. John, E. P. (2003a). Implications of the new global context for urban reform. In L. F. Mirón, & E. P. St. John (Eds.), Reinterpreting urban school reform: Have urban schools failed, or has the reform movement failed urban schools? (pp. 299–311). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mirón, L. F., & St. John, E. P. (2003b). Introduction: Rethinking urban school reform. In L. F. Mirón, & E. P. St. John (Eds.), Reinterpreting urban school reform: Have urban schools failed, or has the reformmovement failed urban schools? (pp. 1–12). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  42. Montero-Sieburth, M. (1989). Restructuring teachers' knowledge for urban settings. Journal of Negro Education, 58(3), 332–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Noguera, P. (2003). City schools and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education. NY: Teacher's College Press.Google Scholar
  44. Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (2003). Teaching to change the world (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  45. Ogbu, J. U. (1982). Cultural discontinuities and schooling. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 13(4), 290–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Patton, M. Q. (2000). Overview: Language matters. In R. K. Hopson (Ed.), How and why language matters in evaluation (pp. 5–16). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Patton, M. Q. (2002) A vision of evaluation that strengthens democracy. Evaluation, 8(1), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pewewardy, C. (1999). Culturally responsive teaching for American Indian students. In E. Hollins, & E. I. Oliver (Eds.), Pathways to success in school: Culturally responsive teaching (pp. 85–100). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  49. Rager, B. K. (2005). Self-care and the qualitative researcher: When collecting data can break your heart. Educational Researcher, 34, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roth, J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Murray, L., & William, F. (1998). Promoting healthy adolescents: Synthesis of youth development program evaluations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8(4), 423–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schön, D. (1982). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 254–282). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Sengupta, S., Hopson, R., & Thompson-Robingson, M. (2004). Cultural context in evaluation: An overview. New Directions in Evaluation, 102, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Slaughter-Defoe, D., Nakagawa, K., Takanishi, R., & Johnson, D. J. (1990). Toward cultural/ecological perspectives on schooling and achievement in African- and Asian-American children. Child Development, 61, 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Solano-Flores, G., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of Science assessments. International Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 553–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. St. John, R. (2004). Proposal to W.K. Kellogg foundation from community house learning center for conversations for common wealth — evaluation. Pittsburugh, PA.Google Scholar
  57. Stromquist, N. P. (1994). Some trends and issues affecting education in the urban context. In P. S. Nelly (Ed.), Education in urban areas: Cross-national dimensions (pp. 29–43). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  58. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluation models. New directions for evaluation, no. 89, Spring. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  59. Sustainable Pittsburgh. (2002). Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Indicators Report 2002. Version 1.0. Retrieved on April 22, 2002, from
  60. Symonette, H. (2004). Walking pathways toward becoming a culturally competent evaluator: Boundaries, borderlands, and border crossings. In M. Thompson Robinson, R. Hopson, & S. SenGupta (Eds.). In search of cultural competence in evaluation: Toward principles and practices (Vol. 102, pp. 95–109). New directions for evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  61. Thomas, R. M., & Stromquist, N. P. (1994). Defining Urban in Educational Studies. In Nelly P. Stromquist (Ed.), Education in urban areas: Cross-national dimensions (pp. 11–28). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  62. Thomas, V. G. (2004). Contextually relevant framework for planning, implementing, and using evaluations. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  63. Thompson-Robinson, M., Hopson, R. K., & SenGupta, S. (Eds.).(2004). In search of cultural competence in evaluation: Toward principles and practices. New directions for evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  64. Trumbull, E., Rothstein-Fisch, C., & Greenfield, P. M. (2000). Bridging cultures in our schools: New approaches that work. San Francisco: West Ed. [ERIC: Document Reproduction Service No. ED 440 954].Google Scholar
  65. Whitty, G. (2000). Sociology of education and urban education policy. In K. A. McClafferty, C. A. Torres, & T. R. Mitchell (Eds.), Challenges of urban education: Sociological perspectives for the nest century (pp. 79–96). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  66. Wilson, J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wilson, W. J. (1997). The political economy and urban racial tensions. In J. H. Skolnick, & E. Currie (Eds.), Crisis in American institutions (10th ed.). NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  68. Yeakey, C. C., Richardson, J., & Brooks-Buck, J. (2006). America's shame: Children living in the shadows of America's prosperity. In C. C. Yeakey, J. Richardson, & J. B. Buck (Eds.), Suffer the little children: National and international dimensions of child poverty and public policy (pp. 1–38). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodney K. Hopson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jennifer C. Greene
    • 3
  • Katrina L. Bledsoe
    • 4
  • Trinidad M. Villegas
    • 3
  • Tanya A. Brown
    • 5
  1. 1.Duquesne UniversityU.S.A.
  2. 2.Cambridge UniversityU.K.
  3. 3.University of Illinois – Urbana ChampaignU.S.A.
  4. 4.The College of New JerseyU.S.A.
  5. 5.Duquesne UniversityU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations