This chapter chronicles urban school reform in the United States from the 1950s to the present and argues that:
-
For the past 50 years urban schools have been in a continuous process of reform.
-
The reforms have addressed almost every imaginable dimension of urban schooling, from district organization to classroom practice to the racial and ethnic composition of student populations and school faculties.
-
Since the early 1980s education reform, including improving urban schools, has been at the top of the national and state political agenda; the rationale for reform has been maintaining the preeminence of the United States in the world economy.
-
The result is that the reform agenda is increasingly directed from outside urban districts – by mayors, state legislatures and departments of education, and the federal government.
-
An area of continuing contention is whether the mandated reforms have been adequately funded given often ambitious goals and objectives.
-
Increasingly federal and state policies have focused on the work of teachers in classrooms, constraining professional autonomy and prescribing standards, curriculum, assessments, and pedagogy.
-
Increasingly urban school reforms have been evaluated in terms of student outcomes, but improvement as measured by standardized test scores and high school completion rates has been limited.
This essay begins with a brief historical review of reforms over a period of six decades, then considers these reforms from four perspectives – organization, instruction, human resource development, and locus of authority, and finally considers several recurrent and emergent issues of reform.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, J. E., & Copland, M. S. (2005). When learning counts: Rethinking licenses for school leaders. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
Alkins, K., Banks-Santilli, L., Elliott, P., Guttenberg, N., & Kamii, M. (2006). Project quest: A journey of discovery with beginning teachers in urban schools. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39(1), 65–80.
American School Board Journal. (2004). Looking for leaders: The state of the urban superintendency. American School Board Journal, 191(12), 36–50.
Annenberg Institute for School Reform. (1997). Reasons for hope, voices for change: A report of the Annenberg Institute on public engagement for public education. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
Asante, M. K. (1991/1992). Afrocentric curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(4), 28–31.
The Aspen Institute. (2004). The challenge for education reform: Standards, accountability, resources, and policy. Washington, DC: Author.
Bailey, T. (1991). Jobs of the future and the education they will require: Evidence from occupational forecasts. Educational Researcher, 20(2), 11–20.
Barber, M., & Fullan, M. (2005). Tri-level development. Education Week, 24(25), 32–35.
Bascia, N. (2004). Teacher unions and the teaching workforce: Mismatch or vital contribution? In M. A. Smylie, & D. Miretzky (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce, 103rd yearbook of the national society for the study of education, Part 1 (pp. 326–347). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Becker, H. J. (2000). Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer technology. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 44–75.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004a). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. New York: Open University Press.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004b). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 9–21.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–144.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Toward coherence between classroom assessment and accountability, 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 20–50). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bond, L., Smith, T., Baker, W. K., & Hattie, J. A. (2000). The certification system of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: A construct and consequential validity study. Greensboro, NC: Center for Educational Research and Evaluation, University of North Carolina.
Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta–analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125–230.
Broad Foundation. (2003). Better leaders for America's schools: A manifesto. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Bunday, M. C., & Kelly, J. A. (1996). National Board Certification and the teaching profession's commitment to quality assurance. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(3), 215–219.
Catalyst: Voices of Urban School Reform. (1997). School reform: What matters most. Chicago, IL: Community Renewal Society.
Clark, D. L., Lotto, L. S., & Astuto, T. A. (1984). Effective schools and school improvement: A comparative analysis of two lines of inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(3), 41–68.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/Outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Comer, J. P. (2005). The rewards of parent participation. Educational Leadership, 62(6), 38–42.
Cowan, K. T., & Manasevit, L. M. (2002). The new Title I: Balancing flexibility with accountability. Tampa, FL: Thompson Publishing Group.
Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3–13.
Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597–604.
David, J. L. (1989, May). Synthesis of research on school-based management. Educational Leadership, 45–53.
Davis, M. R. (2006, April 12). Report: Schools could improve on NCLB tutoring, choice. Education Week, 25(31), 31.
DeBray, E. H., McDermott, K. A., & Wohlstetter, P. (2005). Federalism reconsidered: The case of the no child left behind act. Peabody Journal of Education (special issue), 80(2), 1–18.
Doherty, K. M., & Orlofsky, G. F. (2001, May 10). Student survey says: Schools are not using technology as wisely or effectively as they could. Education Week, 45–48.
Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–24.
Edmonds, R. (1982). Programs of school improvement: An overview. Educational Leadership, 40(3), 4–11.
Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.
Elmore, R. F. (2005). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Erlichson, B. A., & Goertz, M. (2001). Implementing whole school reform in New Jersey: Year two. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Government Services, The State University of New Jersey, Rutgers.
Fine, M., & Somerville, J. (Eds.) (1998). Small schools, big imaginations: A creative look at urban public schools. Chicago: Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform.
Foster, M. (1998). Black teachers on teaching. New York: The New Press.
Fullan, M. (2004). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Gándara, P., & Merino, B. (1993). Measuring the outcomes of LEP programs: Test scores, exit rates, and other mythological data. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(3), 320–338.
Goodlad, J. I. (1983). A study of schooling: Some findings and hypotheses. Phi Delta Kappan, 64(7), 465–470.
Hardy, L. (2004). The new diversity. American School Board Journal, 191(4), 40–44.
Harry, B., & Kingner, J. K. (2005). Why are so many minority students in special education? New York: Teachers College Press.
Honig, M. I., & Hatch, T. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16–30.
Kirst, M., & Bulkley, K. (2000). “New, improved” mayors take over city schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(7), 538–540, 542.
Knapp, M. S. (2003). Leading for learning: Reflective tools for school and district leaders. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that's just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1997). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lara, J., & Mitchell, R. (1986). The seamless web: The interdependence of educational institutions. Education and Urban Society, 19(1), 24–41.
Levin, H. M. (1997). Raising school productivity: The X-efficiency approach. Economics of Education, 16(3), 303–311.
Liebowitz, M., & DeSalvatore, L. (2000). Learning for success: Connecting Learning Communities Initiative evidence report. Boston: Jobs for the Future.
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.
Lynch, D. (2004).Teacher unions: Building a profession, improving our schools. In M. Smylie, & D. Miretzky (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce, 103rd yearbook of the national society for the study of education, Part 1 (pp. 427–430). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lytle, J. (1988). Is special education serving minority students? Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 116–120.
Lytle, J. (1992). Prospects for reforming urban schools. Urban Education, 27(2), 109–131.
Lytle, J. (2002). Whole school reform from the inside. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(2), 164–167.
Lytle, M. H. (2005). America's uncivil wars: The sixties era from Elvis to Richard Nixon. New York: Oxford.
Macedo, D. (2000). The colonialism of the English only movement. Educational Researcher, 29(3), 15–24.
Martin, N., & Halperin, S. (2006). Whatever it takes: How twelve communities are reconnecting out-of-school youth. Washington: American Youth Policy Forum.
Mathews, J. (2001). Nontraditional thinking in the central office. The School Administrator, 58(6), 6–11.
Murphy, J. (1999). New consumerism: Evolving market dynamics in the institutional dimension of schooling. In J. Murphy, & K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration, (2nd ed.) (pp. 405–419). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Murphy, J. (2000). Governing America's schools: The shifting playing field. Teachers College Record, 102(1), 57–84.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA : Author.
National School Board Association's Council of Urban Boards of Education. (2001). Superintendent tenure. Alexandria, VA: Author.
Orfield, G. (1994). The growth of segregation in American schools: Changing patterns of segregation and poverty since 1968. Equity and Excellence in Education, 27(1), 5–8.
Orfield, G., & Yun, J. T. (1999). Resegregation in American schools. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
Pogrow, S. (1998). What is an exemplary program, and why should anyone care? A reaction to Slavin & Klein. Educational Researcher, 27(7), 22–29.
Portin, B. S. (2000). The changing urban principalship. Education and Urban Society, 32(4), 492–505.
Portin, B. S. (2003). Making sense of leading schools: A study of the school principalship. Seattle: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
Robelen, E. W. (2004, September 29). “No Child” law remains on top of Bush record. Education Week, 24(5), 1, 23–24.
Robelen, E. W. (2006, May 3). Small schools' ripple effects debated. Education Week, 25(34), 20.
Russo, C. J., & Talbert-Johnson, C. (1997). The overrepresentation of African American children in special education: The resegregation of educational programming? Education and Urban Society, 29(2), 136–148.
Sandham, J. L. (2001, May 10). Across the nation: Some states are taking more aggressive approaches to close the digital divide than others are. Education Week, 67–68.
Schmoker, M., & Marzano, R. J. (1999). Realizing the promise of standards-based education. Educational Leadership, 56(6), 17–21.
Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., & Weikart, D. P. (2005). Significant benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study Through Age 27. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.
Slavin, R. E. (2004). Built to last: Long–term maintenance of “Success for All.” Remedial and Special Education, 25(1), 61–66.
Smylie, M. A., Miretsky, D., & Konkol, P. (2004). Rethinking teacher workforce development: A strategic human resource management perspective. In M. A. Smylie, & D. Miretzky (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce, 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1 (pp. 34–69). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Supovitz, J. A., Poglinco, S. M., & Snyder, B. A. (2001). Moving mountains: Successes and challenges of the America's Choice comprehensive school reform design. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Tyack, D. B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
United States Conference of Mayors. (2006). Mayoral leadership and involvement in education: An action guide for success. Washington, DC: Author.
United States Department of Education. (1986). What works: Research about teaching and learning. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
United States Department of Labor. (1991). What work requires of schools. A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Useem, E. (2005). Learning from Philadelphia's school reform: What do the research findings show so far? Philadelphia: Research for Action.
Vandervoort, L. G., Amrein-Beardsley, A., & Berliner, D. D. (2004). National Board Certified teachers and their students' achievement. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 12(46), 1–117.
Viadero, D. (2006, May 3). Study finds research on management groups lacking. Education Week, 25(34), 18.
The Wallace Foundation. (2003). Beyond the pipeline: Getting the principals we need. New York: Author.
Weikart, L. A. (1998). Segregated placement patterns of students with disabilities in three states. Educational Policy, 12(4), 432–448.
Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Wong, K. K., & Shen, F. X. (2003). Big city mayors and school governance reform: The case of school district takeover. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(1), 5–32.
Wong, K. K., & Walberg, H. J. (2006). Contemporary school choice research. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(1), 1–6. (special issue).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lytle, J.H. (2007). Urban School Reform: To What End?. In: Pink, W.T., Noblit, G.W. (eds) International Handbook of Urban Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5199-9_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5199-9_45
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5198-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5199-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)