Skip to main content

REPRESENTING STYLE BY FEATURE SPACE ARCHETYPES

  • Conference paper
Design Computing and Cognition ’06

Abstract

Style is a broad term that could potentially refer to any features of a work, as well as a fluid concept that is subject to change and disagreement. A similarly flexible method of representing style is proposed based on the idea of an archetype, to which real designs can be compared, and tested with examples of architectural plans. Unlike a fixed, symbolic representation, both the measurements of features that define a style and the selection of those features themselves can be performed by the machine, making it able to generalise a definition automatically from a set of examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, C, Ishikawa, S, Silverstein, M, Jacobsen, M, Fiksdahl-King, I and Angel, S: 1977, A Pattern Language, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockman JB and Director SW: 1991, The Hercules task management system, Procedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, pp. 254–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, CS: 1994, Operational definitions of style, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 21: 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton RC, and Kirsan C: 2005, Small graph matching and building genotypes, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Desyllas, J: 2000, The Relationship between Urban Street Configuration and Office Rent Patterns in Berlin, PhD thesis, Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, UCL, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desyllas, J and Duxbury E: 2001, Axial maps and visibility graph analysis, Proceedings, 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, pp. 27.1–27.13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, RO, Hart, PE and Stork DG: 2001, Pattern Classification, John Wiley, NY.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Durrant-Whyte H: 2004, Autonomous navigation in unstructured environments, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision, pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, JS and Kazakov, V: 2001, Entropic-based Similarity and Complexity Measures of 2D architectural drawings, in JS Gero, B Tversky and T Purcell (eds), Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design II, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, Sydney, pp. 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ: 1979, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich EH: 1960, Art and Illusion, Phaidon, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman N: 1975, The status of style, Critical Inquiry, Volume 1, Reprinted in Goodman N: 1978, Ways of Worldmaking. Hackett Publishing Company Inc. Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersey, GL and Freedman, R: 1992, Possible Palladian Villas: (Plus a Few Instructively Impossible Ones). The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B, Hanson J, Peponis J, Hudson J and Burdett R: 1983, Space syntax, Architects Journal 178(48): 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B and Hanson J: 1984, The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B, Penn A, Hanson J, Grajewski T and Xu J: 1993, Natural movement, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20: 29–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B and Shu S: 2001, Crime and urban layout: The need for evidence, in S Ballintyne, K Pease and V McLaren (eds), Secure Foundations: Key Issues in Crime Prevention and Community Safety, IPPR, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp J, and Gero, JS: 2003, Towards computational analysis of style in architectural design, in S Argamon (ed), IJCAI03 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Style Analysis and Synthesis, IJCAI, Acapulco, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, J and Gero, JS: 2006, A characterisation of 2D architectural style, Journal of the American Society of Information Science (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight TW: 1998, Shape grammars, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Anniversary Issue, pp. 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen T: 1982, Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps, Biological Cybernetics 43(1): 59–69.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Koile, K: 1997, Design conversations with your computer: Evaluating experiential qualities of physical form, CAAD futures 1997, pp. 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koile, K: 2004, An intelligent assistant for conceptual design, in JS Gero,(ed), Design Computing and Cognition ’04, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koning H and Eizenberg J: 1981, The language of the prairie: Frank Lloyd Wright’s prairie houses, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 8: 295–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis J, Hadjinikolaov E, Livieratos C and Fatouros DA: 1989, The spatial core of urban culture, Ekistics 56(334/335): 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prats M, Earl C, Garner S and Jowers I: 2006, Exploring style through generative shape description, AIEDAM Journal 20(3): (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt F: 1958, The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain, Psychological Review 65(6): 386–408.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Spiliopoulou G and Penn A: 1999, Organisations as multi-layered networks, Proceedings, 2 nd Intl. Space Syntax Symposium, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiny G: 1976, Two exercises in formal composition, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 3: 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiny G: 1980, Introduction to shape and shape grammars. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 7: 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiny G and Mitchell WJ: 1978, The Palladian grammar, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 5: 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang H-H and Gero J: 2001, Sketches as affordances of meanings in the design process, in JS Gero, B Tversky and T Purcell (eds), Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design II, University of Sydney, Australia, pp. 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann, B, Abdi, H and Dowling, WJ: 2004, Musical style perception by a linear autoassociator model and human listeners, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mucic Perception & Cognition, Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk, M and Pentland, A: 1991, Eigenfaces for recognition, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3(1): 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A: 2005, An algorithmic definition of the axial map, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32(3): 425–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner A, Doxa M, O’Sullivan D, and Penn A: 2001, From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28(1): 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik V: 1995, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, R: 2004, Key Buildings of the Twentieth Century: Plans, Sections, Elevations, WW Norton & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

HANNA, S. (2006). REPRESENTING STYLE BY FEATURE SPACE ARCHETYPES. In: GERO, J.S. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition ’06. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5130-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5131-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics