Communitarian versus Individualistic Arrangements in the Family: What and Whose Income Matters for Happiness?

  • Mariano Rojas
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 29)


Household Income Personal Income Financial Satisfaction Personal Expenditure Social Indicator Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, G.S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81(4): 813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G.S. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2): S11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G.S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Benjamin, D. (1992). Household composition, labor markets, and labor demand: testing for separation in agricultural household models. Econometrica, 60(2):287–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diener, E. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 59:119–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., and Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28:195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E. and Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research 40:189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E. and Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: income and subjective well-being across nations. In Diener, E. and Suh, E. (eds.) Subjective Well-being Across Cultures. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, pp. 185–218.Google Scholar
  9. Douthitt, R.A., MacDonald, M., and Mullis, R. (1992). The relationship between measures of subjective and economic well-Being: a new look. Social Indicators Research 26: 407–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some Empirical Evidence’, In David, P.A. and Reder, M.W. (eds.) Nations and Households in Economic Growth. Academic Press, pp. 89–125.Google Scholar
  11. Easterlin, R. (1995). Will rising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 27(1):35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Easterlin, R. (2001). Income and happiness: towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111:465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edmonds, E., Mammen, K., and Miller, D. (2004). Rearranging the Family? Income Support and Elderly Living Arrangements in a Low Income Country. NBER Working Paper 10306, New York, United States, February.Google Scholar
  14. Frey, B. and Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110:918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuentes, N. and Rojas, M. (2001). Economic theory and subjective well-being: Mexico. Social Indicators Research, 53:289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsieh, C-M. (2004). Income and financial satisfaction among older adults in the United States. Social Indicators Research 66:249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101(2):988–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4):139–158.Google Scholar
  19. Lundberg, S., Pollak, R., and Wales, T. (1997). Do husbands and wives pool their resources? Evidence from the UK child benefit. Journal of Human Resources 32(3):463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manser, M. and Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision-making: a bargaining analysis. International Economic Review, 21(1):31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McElroy, M.B. (1985). The joint determination of household membership and market work: the case of young men. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(3):293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McElroy, M.B. (1990). The empirical content of nash-bargained household behaviour. Journal of Human Resources, 25(4):559–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Praag, B. and Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Pollak, R.A. (1994). For better of worse: the roles of power in models of distribution within marriage. American Economic Review, 84(2):148–152.Google Scholar
  25. Pollak, R.A. (2002). Gary Becker’s Contributions to Family and Household Economics. NBER Working Paper W9232, New York, United States.Google Scholar
  26. Rosenzweig, M.R. (1988). Risk, implicit contracts, and the family in rural areas of low-income countries. The Economic Journal 98(393):1148–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Straus J. and Tomas, D. (1995). Human resources: empirical modelling of household and family decisions. In Behrman, J. and Srinivasan, T.N. (eds.), Handbook of Development Economics IIIA. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1883–2023.Google Scholar
  28. Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household resource allocation. An inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources, 25(4):635–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vogel, J. (2003). The family. Social Indicators Research, 64:393–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariano Rojas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations