Surface Treatment

A CRITICAL APPROACH TO SURFACE AND POROUS STONE ANALYSIS METHODS
  • M. Brugnara
  • C. Della Volpe
  • D. Maniglio
  • S. Siboni

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to give a correct interpretation to contact angles values that are obtained on porous surfaces by applying different methods. First a brief description of the physical meaning of the contact angle value is given, then a new methodology for the contact angle analysis by using the Wilhelmy balance is presented. Finally some limitations in the use of the Washburn’s equation are shown.

Keywords

Porosity Mercury Silicate Amide Calcite 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    T. Young, Philos. Trans. 95, 65 (1805).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P.S. De Laplace, in: Mech. Celeste Suppl. Book (1806).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.W. Washburn, The Dynamics of Capillary Flow, Phys. Review XVIII, 3 (1921).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Wilhelmy, über die Abhängigkeit der Capilaritätsconstanten des Alkohols von Substanz und Gestalt des benetzten festen Körpers, Annalen der Physik 119, 177 (1863).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Brugnara, E. De Gasperi, C. Della Volpe, D. Maniglio, A. Penati, S. Siboni, L. Toniolo, T. Poli, S. Invernizzi, and V. Castelvetro, The application of the contact angle in monument protection: new materials and methods, Colloids Surf., A 241, 299–312 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B.H. Vos, Suction of Groundwater, Studies in Conservation 16, 129–144 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Biscontin, La conservazione dei materiali lapidei: trattamenti conservativi, La Pietra: Interventi conservazione rest auro. Atti del Convegno Internazionale Lecce 6-8 novembre 1981 (Congedo Editore, Galatina Italy, 1983).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Lazzarini and M. Laurenzi Tabasso, Il restauro della pietra, (CEDAM, Padova, 1986).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Della Volpe, D. Maniglio, S. Siboni, and M. Morra, An experimental procedure to obtain the equilibrium contact angle from the Wilhelmy method., Oil & gas science and technology 56, 9–22 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Della Volpe, S. Siboni, M. Morra, and D. Maniglio, The determination of a “stableequilibrium” contact angle on heterogeneous and rough surfaces., Colloids Surf., A 206, 46–67 (2002).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.D. Schulze, W. Possart, H. Kamusewitz, and C. Bischof, Young’s equilibrium contact angle on rough solid surfaces. Part I. An empirical determination, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 3(1), 1–78 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Kamusewitz, W. Possart, and D. Paul, The relation between Young’s equilibrium contact angle and the hysteresis on rough paraffin wax surfaces, Colloids Surf., A 156, 271– 279 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.E. Johnson Jr. and R.H. Dettre, Contact angle hysteresis III: Study of an idealized heterogeneous surface, J. Phys. Chem. 68, 1744–1750 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Labajos Broncano, M.L. Gonzales, J.M. Bruque, C.M. Gonzales Garcia, and B. Janczuk, On the Use of Washburn’s Equation in the Analysis of Weight-Time Measurements Obtained from Imbibition Experiments, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 219, 275–281 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Brugnara
    • 1
  • C. Della Volpe
    • 1
  • D. Maniglio
    • 1
  • S. Siboni
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Engineering Materials and Industrial TechnologiesUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations