Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Archibugi, F., 2004, “Planning Theory: Reconstruction or Requiem for Planning,” European Planning Studies 12(3): 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (1979). “Progress, success and failure in urban modelling,” Environment and Planning A 11: 863–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry, A. and A. Pinsonneault, 2005, “Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation,” MIS Quarterly 29(3): 493–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brail, R. and R. Klosterman (eds.), 2001, Planning Support Systems, integrating geographic information systems, models and visualization tools, Redlands California, Esri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compeau, D. and C. Higgins, 1991, “A social cognitive theory perspective on individual reactions to computing technology,” 12th Annual conference on information systems (ICIS), New York, USA, Association for Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croswell, P., 1991, “Obstacles to GIS Implementation and Guidelines to Increase the Oppurtunities for Success.” URISA Journal 3(1): 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F., 1986, A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user informa tion systems: theory and results, Cambridge Massachussets, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishaw, M. and D. Strong, 1999, “Extending the technology acceptance model with task- technology fit constructs,” Information & Management 36(1): 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dishaw, M., D. Strong, et al., 2002, “Extending the Task-Technology Fit Model with Self- Efficacy Constructs,” Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2002, Dallas, USA, Association for Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, A., 1973, Planning Theory, New York, Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J., 1989, Planning in the face of Power, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frambach, R. and N. Schillewaert, 2002, “Organizational innovation adoption, A multilevel framework of determinants and opportunities for future research,” Journal of Business Research 55(2): 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., 1987, Planning in the public domain; From knowledge to action, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertman, S. and J. Stillwell (eds.), 2003, Planning Support Systems in Practice, Advances in Spatial Science. Berlin, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertman, S. and J. Stillwell, 2004, “Planning Support Systems: an inventory of current practice,” Computers Environment and Urban Systems 28(4): 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue, D. L., 1995, “Understanding user evaluations of information systems,” Management Science 41(12): 1827–1844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue, D. L. and R. L. Thompson, 1995, “Task-Technology fit and Individual Performance,” MIS Quarterly 19(2): 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., 2002, “Planning: millennial retrospect and prospect,” Progress in Planning, 57: 63–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. and D. Simpson, 1993, “Implementing GIS for planning,” Journal of the American Planning Association 59(2): 230–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karahanna, E. and D. Straub, 1999, “The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use,” Information & Management 35(4): 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, M., P. M. Beranek, et al., 1995, “Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations,” Decision Support Systems 13(1): 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., 1973, “Requiem for large-scale models,” Journal of the American Planning Association 39(3): 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., 1994, “Retrospective on large-scale urban models,” Journal of the AmericanPlanning Association, 60(1): 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieson, K., 1991, “Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behaviour,” Information Systems Research 2(3): 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S., 1979, “A methodology for using models for planning purposes,” Environment and Planning A 11: 879–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E., 1995, Diffusion of innovations, New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell, J., S. Geertman, et al., 1999, “Developments in Geographical Information and Planning,” in J. Stillwell, Geertman, S. and S. Openshaw (eds.) Geographical Information and Planning, Berlin, Springer-Verlag: 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V. and F. Davis (2000), “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science 46(2): 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., M. Morris, et al., 2004, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, G., S. Geertman, et al., 2005, “Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of Planning Support Systems,” Environment and Planning A 17: 909–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, G., S. Geertman, et al., 2006, “New technologies stuck in old hierarchies: an analysis of the diffusion of geo-information technologies in Dutch planning organizations,” Public Administration Review 66(Forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, G., S. Geertman, et al., 2006, “A SWOT-analysis of Planning Support Systems,” Environment and Planning A 38(Forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vonk, G., Geertman, S., Schot, P. (2006). Usage of Planning Support Systems. In: Van Leeuwen, J.P., Timmermans, H.J.P. (eds) Innovations in Design & Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5060-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5060-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5059-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5060-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics