US Efforts to Create a New Professional Identity for the Bioscience Industry

  • David Finegold
  • Robert Matousek
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 5)


Labor Market Computational Biology Professional Identity Biotechnology Industry Interdisciplinary Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Black, G.C. and P.E. Stephan (2004). Bioinformatics: Recent trends in programs, placements and job opportunities. Report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
  2. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor (2005). Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2004–05 Edition, Biological Scientists. Retrieved April 20, 2005 from
  3. Casper, S. (2005). How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable? Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster. Paper presented for EGOS Annual Conference, Free University, Berlin, June 30–July 2.Google Scholar
  4. Cooke, P. (2003). The evolution of biotechnology in three continents: Schumpeterian or Penrosian? European Planning Studies, 11, 757–763 (Special Issue on Biotechnology Clusters and Beyond).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferlie, E., L. Fitzgerald, C. Hawkins and M. Wood (2005). The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finegold, D. (2006). The role of education and training systems and innovation. In G. Hage and M. Meeus (Eds.), Institutions and innovation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  7. Fontes, M. (2001). Biotechnology entrepreneurs and technology transfer in an intermediate economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 66(2), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gatenby, R.A. and P.K. Maini (2003). Mathematical oncology: Cancer summed up. Nature, 421, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagstrom, W.O. (1965). Social control in science. In L. Beckman and B.T. Eiduson (Eds.), Science as a career choice: Theoretical and empirical studies (pp. 593–601). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Hilts, P. (2003). Protecting America's health. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  11. Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 764–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IBM (2004). Pharma 2010: Silicon reality. Somers, NY: IBM Business Consulting Services.Google Scholar
  13. Leicht, K.T. and M.L. Fennell (2001). Professional work: A sociological approach. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Inc. (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd).Google Scholar
  14. Mohrman, S., S. Cohen and A. Mohrman (1997). Designing knowledge work teams. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Mowery, D.C., R.R. Nelson, B.N. Sampat and A.A. Ziedonis (2004). Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. National Institute of Health (1997). Working definition of bioengineering. Washington, DC: NIH Bioengineering definition committee. Retrieved from
  17. Nebeker, F. (2002). Golden accomplishments in biomedical engineering. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine (IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag), 21(3), 17–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nerem, R. (1997). The emergence of bioengineering. The Bridge, 27(4). Retrieved April 12, 2005 from
  19. Riggs, H. (1999). Venturing. Claremont: Keck Graduate Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Oliver, A. and K. Montgomery (2000). Creating a Hybrid Organizational Form from Parental Bluprints: The Emergence and Evolution of Knowledge Firms," Human Relations, January, 53, 1, 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shahi, G. (2004). Biobusiness in Asia. Singapore: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Zucker, L. and M. Darby (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Pattern of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 12709–12716CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Finegold
    • 1
  • Robert Matousek
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Management and Labor RelationsRutgars UniversityNew BrunswickUS

Personalised recommendations