Abstract
The self-potential method consists in the passive measurement of the distribution of the electrical potential at the ground surface of the Earth and in boreholes. The purpose of this method is to map the electrical potential to reveal one or several polarization mechanisms at play in the ground. In some cases, the self-potential signals are monitored with a network of non-polarisable electrodes, which provides both a better signal-to-noise ratio and the possibility to discriminate between various sources. The two main contributions to the self-potential signals are (1) the streaming potential or hydroelectric coupling (Fournier, 1989; Birch, 1993, 1998; Aubert and Yéné Atangana, 1996; Revil and Leroy, 2001) and (2) electro-chemical processes (membrane or diffusion potentials) associated with gradients of the chemical potentials of ionic species in the pore water (e.g., Sen, 1991; Naudet et al., 2003, 2004; Revil and Leroy, 2005). In the former case, the self-potential signal correponds to the electrical field associated with the flow of ground water in a porous medium and more precisely with the drag of the excess of charge generally contained in the so-called diffuse layer in the vicinity of the mineral surface (e.g. Revil and Leroy, 2004). If the chemical potential concerns the electrons (redox potential), the transfer of electrons through an electronic conductor also generates self-potential signals in the surrounding conductive medium as discussed by Sato and Mooney (1960).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adler, P.M., J.F. Thovert, C. Jacquin, P. Morat, and J.L. Le Mouël, 1997. Electrical signals induced by the atmospheric pressure variations in unsaturated media. Comptes Rendus De l’Académie Des Sciences Série II, Fascicule a, Sciences de la Terre et des Planètes, Vol. 324, pp. 711–718.
Albouy, Y., S. Cabrera, C. Camerlynck, M. Dietrich, C. Doussan, N. Florsch, S. Garambois, S. Hautot, L. Jouniaux, E. Marmet, M. Menviell, H. Perroud, D. Rousset, L. Szarka, and P. Tarits, 2000. PNRH Géophysique – Hydrologie 99: Un premier compte rendu des expérimentations menées sur le site INRA d’Avignon, Colloque PNRH 2000, Toulouse, May 16–17, 19–143.
Atangana, J.Q.Y., B. Nyeck, D. Bitom, and H. Robain, 2003. Self-potential anomalies in the lateritic cover of the Nsimi watershed in southern Cameroon: Origin and influence of electrical and granulometric parameters. J. Appl. Geophys., 54, 85–96.
Aubert, M., and Q.Y. Atangana, 1996. Self-potential method in hydrogeological exploration of volcanic areas. Ground Water, 34, 1010–1016.
Aubert, M., I.N. Dana, and A. Gourgaud, 2000. Internal structure of the Merapi summit from self-potential measurements. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 100, 337–343.
Béhaegel, M., J.-C. Gourry, and J.-F. Girard, 2004. Geophysical measurements on an ancient coking plant contaminated by tar, GU 1st General Assembly, Nice, 25–30 April 2004, Poster HS17-1FR2P-0110 (session EGU04-A-01783).
Bigalke, J., and E.W. Grabner, 1997. The geobattery model: A contribution to large scale electrochemistry, Electrochem. Acta, 42, 3443–3452.
Birch, F.S., 1993. Testing Fournier’s method for finding water table from self-potential, Ground Water, 31, 50–56.
Birch, F.S., 1998. Imaging the water table by filtering self-potential profiles, Ground Water, 36, 779–782.
Bogoslovsky, V.A., and A.A. Ogilvy, 1977. Geophysical methods in the investigations of landslides, Geophysics, 42, 562–571.
Bogoslovsky, V.A., and A.A. Ogilvy, 1973. Deformation of natural electric fields near drainage structures, Geophys. Prospect., 21, 716–723.
Bruno, F., and F. Marillier, 2000. Test of high-resolution seismic reflection and other geophysical techniques on the Boup Landslide in the Swiss Alps, Surv. Geophys., 21, 333–348.
Buselli, G., and K. Lu, 2001. Groundwater contamination monitoring with multichannel electrical and electromagnetic methods, J. Appl. Geophys., 48, 11–23.
Butler, J.J., and X. Zhan, 2004. Hydraulic tests in highly permeable aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 40, W12402, doi: 10.1029/2003WR002998.
Cavalcante, F., S. Fiore, G. Piccareta, and F. Tateo, 2003. Geochemical and mineralogical approaches to assessing provenance and deposition of shales: A case study. Clay Miner., 38, 383–397.
Chène, G., C. Brunjail, N. Aouaissia-Abdallah, and G. Bastian, 1995. Détection de flux hydriques dans les géomatériaux par mesure de polarisation spontanée, in Proceedings Journées détude sur les milieux poreux et transferts dans les structures du génie civil et de l’habitat, janvier 1995, Société Française des Thermiciens, Vol. 1–9.
Colangelo, G., J. Heinicke, U. Koch, V. Lapenna, G. Martinelli, and L. Telesca, 2005. Results of gas flux records in the seismically active area of Val d’Agri (Southern Italy). Annals Geophys., 48 (1), 55–63.
Corwin, R.F., 1990. The self-potential method for environmental and engineering applications, in Geotechnical and environmental Geophysics, vol.1: Reviews and tutorial, edited by S.H. Ward, Society of Exploration Geophysics, Tucson, pp. 127–145.
Corwin, R.F., and D.B. Hoover, 1979. The self-potential method in geothermal exploration, Geophysics, 44 (2), 226–245.
Cruden, D.M., and D.J. Varnes, 1996. Landslide types and processes and mitigation, in Landslides – investigation and mitigation, edited by A.K. Turner and R.L. Schuster, Transportation Research Board, Spec. Rep. 247, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, pp. 36–75.
Darnet, M., G. Marquis, and P. Sailhac, 2003. Estimating aquifer hydraulic properties from the inversion of surface streaming potential anomalies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1679, doi: 10.1029/2003GL017631.
Darnet, M., and G. Marquis, 2004. Modelling streaming potential (SP) signals induced by water movement in the vadose zone, J. Hydrol., 285, 114–124.
Doussan, C., L. Jouniaux, and J.L. Thony, 2002. Variations of self-potential and unsaturated water flow with time in sandy loam and clay loam soils. J. Hydrol., 267, 173–185.
Ernstson, K., and U. Scherer, 1986. Self-potential variations wirh time and their relation to hydrogeological and meteorological parameters, Geophysics, 51, 1967–1977.
Fitterman, D.V., 1978. Electrokinetic and magnetic anomalies associated with dilatant regions in a layered earth, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 5923–5932.
Fitterman, D.V., 1979. Calculations of self-potential anomalies near vertical contacts, Geophysics, 44, 195–205.
Fournier, C., 1989. Spontaneous potentials and resistivity surveys applied to hydrogeology in a volcanic area: Case history of the Chaîne des Puys (Puy-de-Dôrne, France), Geophys. Prospecting, 37, 647–668.
Fox, R.W., 1830. On the electromagnetic properties of metalliferous veins in the mines of Cornwall, Philosoph. Transact. Royal Soc., 130, 399.
Frischknecht, F.C., L. Muth, R. Grette, T. Buckley, and B. Kornegay, 1983. Geophysical methods for locating abandoned wells, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Report 83-702.
Gallipoli, M., V. Lapenna, P. Lorenzo, M. Mucciarelli, A. Perrone, S. Piscitelli, and F. Sdao, 2000. Comparison of geological and geophysical prospecting techniques in the study of a landslide in Southern Italy. Eur. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 4, 117–128.
Gex, P., 1980. Phénomènes d’électrofiltration liés à quelques sites de barrages, Bull. Soc. Vaud Sci. Nat., 357 (75), 39–50.
Gibert, D., and M. Pessel, 2001. Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: Application to self-potential profiles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1863–1866.
Gorelik, A.M., and I.P. Nesterenko, 1956. Metod potentsialov elektrofil’tratsii pri opredelenii radiusa depressionnoi voronki v khode otkachki iz skvazhini. (Method of electro-filtration potential in the determination of radius of the depression cone during a pumping test from borehole, in russian), Izvestia Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geofiz. (Solid Earth Physics), 11, 1361–1363.
Guichet, X., L. Jouniaux, and J.-P. Pozzi, 2003. Streaming potential of a sand column in partial saturation conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 2141, doi: 10.1029/2001JB001517.
Hack, R., Geophysics for slope stability, 2000. Surv. Geophys., 21, 423–448.
Hämmann, M., H.R. Maurer, A.G. Green, and H. Horstmeyer, 1997. Self-potential image reconstruction: Capabilities and limitations, J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 2, 21–35.
Hauk, O., A. Keil, T. Elbert, and M.M. Müller, 2002. Comparison of data transformation procedures to enhance topographical accuracy in time-series analysis of the human EEG, J. Neurosci. Methods, 113, 111–122.
Hutchinson, D.J., R. Harrap, M. Diederichs, M. Villeneuve, and N. Kjelland, 2003. Geotechnical rule development for ground instability assessment using intelligent GIS and networked monitoring sensors. 3rd Canadian Conference on Geotechnique and Natural Hazards. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, June 9 and 10.
Iuliano, T., P. Mauriello, and D. Patella, 2002. Looking inside Mount Vesuvius by potential fields integrated probability tomographies, J. Volcanology Geothermal Res., 113, 363–378.
Keller, G.V., and F.C. Frischknect, 1966. Electrical methods in Geophysical Prospecting, Pergamon, Oxford, p. 517.
Lachassagne, P., and M. Aubert, 1989. Etude des phénomènes de polarisation spontanée (PS) enregistrées dans un sol lors de transferts hydriques verticaux, Hydrogéologie, 1, 7–17.
Lapenna, V., P. Lorenzo, A. Perrone, S. Piscitelli, E. Rizzo, and F. Sdao, 2003. High-resolution geoelectrical tomographies in the study of the Giarrossa landslide (Potenza, Basilicata). Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 62, 259–268.
Lapenna, V., P. Lorenzo, A. Perrone, S. Piscitelli, E. Rizzo, and F. Sdao, 2005. 2D electrical resistivity imaging of some complex landslides in the Lucanian Apennine chain, Southern Italy, geophysics, 70 (3), B11–B18.
Loke, M.H., and R.D. Barker, 1996. Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophys. Prospect., 44, 131–152.
Mauritsch, H.J., W. Seiberl, R. Arndt, A. Romer, K. Schneiderbauer, and G.P. Sendlhofer, 2000. Geophysical investigations of large landslides in the Carnic region of southern Austria. Eng. Geol., 56, 373–388.
McCann, D.M., and A. Forster, 1990. Reconnaissance geophysical methods in landslide investigations, Eng. Geol., 29, 59–78.
Moore, J.R., S.D. Glaser, H.F. Morrison, and G.M. Hoversten, 2004. The streaming potential of liquid carbon dioxide in Berea sandstone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L17610, doi: 10.1029/2004GL020774.
Moore J.R., and S.D. Glaser, 2004. Laboratory observation of an advancing boiling front in a porous medium and correlation to self-potential measurements, in Proceedings 29th Workshop on Geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, January 26–28.
Morat P., and J.M. Le Mouël, 1992. Signaux électriques engendrés par des varaitions de contrainte dans des roches poreuses non saturées, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Sér., 2, 315, 955–963.
Morat P, J.L. Le Mouël, and A. Granier, 1994. Electrical Potential on a Tree – a Measurement of the Sap Flow, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Sér. III – Sci. Vie, Life Sci., 317, 98–101.
Morgan, F.D., E.R. Williams, and T.R. Madden, 1989. Streaming potentials properties of Westerly granite with applications, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 12449–12461.
Murashko, A.M., B.K. Khasenevich, and P.I. Firsiuk, 1981. Vremennie recomendatsii po premeneniu geofisicheskikh metodov pri iziskaniyakh dlia meliorativnogo stroitel’stva v usloviakh BSSR. (Recommendations for use of geophysical methods for investigations for amending construction in BSSR, in Russian), Belnii MVH, Minsk, p. 51.
Naudet, V., A. Revil, E. Rizzo, J.-Y. Bottero, and P. Bégassat, 2004. Groundwater redox conditions and conductivity in a contaminant plume from geoelectrical investigations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8 (1), 8–22.
Naudet, V., A. Revil, J.-Y. Bottero, and P. Bégassat, 2003. Relationship between self-potential (SP) signals and redox conditions in contaminated groundwater, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30 (21), 2091, doi: 10.1029/2003GL018096.
Nimmer R.E., and J.L. Osiensky, 2002. Direct current and self-potential monitoring of an evolving plume in partially saturated fractured rock. J. Hydrol., 267, 258–272.
Patella, D., 1997a. Introduction to gound surface self-potential tomography. Geophys. Prospect., 45, 653–681.
Patella, D., 1997b. Self-potential global tomography including topographic effects, Geophys. Prospect., 45, 843–863.
Perrier, F., and P. Morat, 2000. Characterization of electrical daily variations induced by capillary flow in the non-saturated zone. Pure Appl. Geophys., 157, 785–810.
Perrier, F., and S.R. Pant, 2005. Noise reduction in long-term self-potential monitoring with travelling electrode referencing. Pure Appl. Geophys., 162, 165–179.
Perrier, F.E., G. Petiau, G. Clerc, V. Bogorodsky, E. Erkul, L. Jouniaux, D. Lesmes, J. Macnae, J.M. Meunier, D. Morgan, D. Nascimento, G. Oettinger, G. Schwarz, H. Toh, M.J. Valiant, K. Vozoff, and O. Yazici-Cakin, 1997. A one-year systematic study of electrodes for long period measurements of the electric field in geophysical environments. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 49, 1677–1696.
Perrone, A., A. Iannuzzi, V. Lapenna, P. Lorenzo, S. Piscitelli, E. Rizzo, and F. Sdao, 2004. High-resolution electrical imaging of the Varco d’Izzo earthflow (Southern Italy). J. Appl. Geophys., 56 (1), 17–29.
Perry, J.W., C.H. Corry, and T. Madden, 1996. Monitoring leakage from underground storage tanks (UST) using spontaneous polarization method, SEG (extended abstract).
Pisarenko, D., P. Morat, and J.-L. Le Mouel, 1996. On a possible mechanism of sandstone alteration: Evidence from electric potential measurements, Comptes-Rendus De L’Académie Des Sciences Série Ii Fascicule a-Sciences De La Terre et des Planètes, Vol. 322, pp. 17–24.
Poldini, E., 1938. Geophysical exploration by spontaneous polarization methods, Mining Mag., London, 59, 278–282, 347–352.
Polemio, M., and F. Sdao, 1998. Heavy rainfalls and extensive landslides occurred in Basilicata, southern Italy, in 1976, in Proc. 8th Int. Cong. EEGS, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 1849–1855.
Pride, S.R., 1994. Governing equations for the coupled electromagnetics and acoustics of porous media, Phys. Rev. B, 50, 15678–15696.
Revil, A., P. Leroy, and K. Titov, 2005. Characterization of transport properties of argillaceous sediments. Application to the Callovo-Oxfordian Argillite, J. Geophys. Res., 110, B06202, doi: 10.1029/2004JB003442.
Revil A., and A. Cerepi, 2004. Streaming potential in two-phase flow condition, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31(11), L11605, doi:1029/2004GL020140.
Revil, A., and P. Leroy, 2001. Hydroelectric coupling in a clayey material, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28 (8), 1643–1646.
Revil, A., and P. Leroy, 2004. Governing equations for ionic transport in porous shales, J. Geophys. Res., 109, B03208, doi : 10.1029/2003JB002755.
Revil, A., V. Naudet, and J.D. Meunier, 2004. The hydroelectric problem of porous rocks: Inversion of the water table from self-potential data, Geophys. J. Int., 159, 435–444.
Revil, A., V. Naudet, J. Nouzaret, and M. Pessel, 2003. Principles of electrography applied to self-potential electrokinetic sources and hydrogeological applications, Water Resour. Res., 39 (5), 1114, doi: 10.1029/2001WR000916.
Revil, A., D. Hermite, M. Voltz, R. Moussa, J.-G. Lacas, G. Bourrié, and F. Trolard, 2002. Self-potential signals assosiated with variations of the hydraulic head during an infiltration experiment, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29 (7), 1106, doi: 10.1029/2001GL014294.
Revil, A., P.A. Pezard, and P.W.J. Glower, 1999. Streaming potential in porous media: 1.Theory of the zeta potential. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 20021–20031.
Revil, A., H. Schwaeger, L.M. Cathles, and P.D. Manhardt, 1999. Streaming potential in porous media 2. Theory and application to geothermal systems, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 20033–20048.
Rizzo, E., B. Suski, A. Revil, S. Straface, and S. Troisi, 2004. Self-potential signals associated with pumping-test experiments, J. Geophys. Res., 109, B10203, doi: 10.1029/2004JB003049.
Sailhac, P., M. Darnet, and G. Marquis, 2004. Electrical streaming potential measured at the ground surface: Forward modelling and inversion issues for monitoring infiltration and characterizing the vadose zone, Vadose Zone J., 3, 1200–1206.
Sato, M., and H.M. Mooney, 1960. The electrochemical mechanism of sulfide self-potentials, Geophysics, 25 (1), 226–249.
Schmutz, M., Y. Albouy, R. Guerin, O. Maquaire, J. Vassal, J.J. Schott, and M. Descloitres, 2000. Joint electrical and Time domain electromagnetism (TdEM) data inversion applied to the Super Sauze earthflow (France), Surv. Geophys., 21, 371–390.
Schlumberger, C., M. Schlumberger, and E.G. Leonardon, 1934. A new contribution to subsurface studies by means of electrical measurements in drill holes, Trans. AIME, 110.
Sekihara, K. et al., 1997. Noise covariance incorporated MEG-MUSIC algorithm: A method for multiple-dipole estimation tolerant of the influence of background brain activity, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 44, 839–849.
Semenov, A.S., 1980. Elektrorazvedka metodom estestvennogo elektricheskogo polia (Electrical proself-potential ecting with the natural electric field method, 2nd edn., In Russian), Nedra, Leningrad, p. 445.
Sen, P.N., 1991. Correspondence between membrane potential and conductivity, Geophysics, 56 (4), 461–471.
Sharma, P. S., 1997. Enviromental and Engineering Geophysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sill, W., 1983. Self-potential modeling from primary flows, Geophysics, 48, 76–86.
Sprunt, E.S., T.B. Mercer, and N.F. Djabbarah, 1994. Streaming potential from multiphase flow. Geophysics, 59, 707–711.
Steeples, D.W., 2001. Engineering and environmental geophysics at the millennium, Geophysics, 66, 31–35.
Stoll, J., J. Bigalke, and E.W. Grabner, 1995. Electrochemical modelling of self-potential anomalies, Sur. Geophys., 16, 107–120.
Thony, J.L., P. Morat, G. Vachaud, and J.L. Le Mouël, 1997. Field characterization of the relationship between electrical potential gradients and soil water flux. Comptes Rendus De L’Académie Des Sciences Série II, Fascicule a, Sciences de la Terre et des Planètes, Vol. 325, pp. 317–321.
Timm, F., and P. Möller, 2001. The relation between electric and redox potential: An evidence from laboratory to field experiments, J. Geochem. Explor., 72, 115–127.
Titov, K., A. Revil, P. Konasovsky, S. Straface, and S. Troisi, 2005. Numerical modeling of self-potential signals associated with a pumping test experiment, Geophys. J. Int., 162, 641–650.
Titov, K., Y. Ilyin, P. Konosavski, and A. Levitski, 2002. Electrokinetic self-potential ontaneous polarization in porous media: petrophysics and numerical modelling, J. Hydrol., 267, 207–216.
Vachaud, G., C. Dancette, M. Sonko, and J.L. Thony, 1978. Méthodes de caractérisation hydriodynamique in situ d’un sol non-saturé. Application à deux types de sols du Sénégal en vue de la détermination du bilan hydrique. Ann. Agron., 29, 1–36.
Vichabian, Y., and F.D. Morgan, 2002. Self potentials in cave detection, The Leading Edge, September, pp. 866–871.
Vichabian, Y., P. Reppert, and F.D. Morgan, 1999. Self-Potential Mapping of Contaminants. In Proceedings of the symposium on the application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, pp. 14–18.
Weigel, M., 1989. Self-potential surveys on waste dumps, in Theory and Practice in Detection of subsurface Flow Phenomena, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol. 27, G.-P. Merkler et al. (Eds.), Detection of Subsurface Flow Phenomena, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 109–120.
Xu, X.L., B. Xu, and B. He, 2003. An alternative subspace approach to EEG dipole source localization, Phys. Med. Biol., 49, 327–343.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Revil, A., Titov, K., Doussan, C., Lapenna, V. (2006). APPLICATIONS OF THE SELF-POTENTIAL METHOD TO HYDROLOGICAL PROBLEMS. In: Vereecken, H., Binley, A., Cassiani, G., Revil, A., Titov, K. (eds) Applied Hydrogeophysics. NATO Science Series, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4912-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4912-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4910-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4912-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)