Living in a Post-Apartheid City: A Baseline Survey of Quality of Life in Buffalo City

  • Robin Richards
  • Ellen Kamman
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 28)

Community quality of life (QOL) is an elusive concept to define. Its meaning depends on where you live, where you work (if you work), and who you are (for example, your gender, class, and culture). This view of QOL is supported by other researchers like Proshansky and Fabian (1986). Like other cities and towns in South Africa, the legacy of apartheid not only left deep physical and psychological scars but also resulted in huge data gaps in Buffalo City for proper city planning. The 2001 QOL collected a spectrum of social data for Buffalo City, including community indicators of development at the level of smaller towns and suburbs. The survey had a number of important specific objectives, the main ones being: filling large socioeconomic data gaps to facilitate the completion of the municipality’s first strategic plan—in South African city planning parlance, these are also referred to as Integrated Development Plans (IDPs); facilitating economic development of the city; quantifying development needs and prioritizing development initiatives; and providing baseline data for the monitoring of service delivery backlogs (Buffalo City Municipality Integrated Development Plan, 2002). The survey also set up a vehicle through which Buffalo City residents were able to participate in city planning by identifying their own development needs.

Keywords

Europe Income Marketing Beach Resi 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buffalo City Municipality Integrated Development Plan (2002).Google Scholar
  2. Bank, L. (1996). Poverty in Duncan Village, East London: A Qualitative Perspective. Report Prepared for the World Bank’s Qualitative Poverty Assessment in South Africa. Grahamstown: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Rhodes University.Google Scholar
  3. Cook, G. and Opland, J.—(1980). Mdantsane Transitional City. Occasional Paper Number Twenty-Five. Grahamstown: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Rhodes University.Google Scholar
  4. Israel, D. (1992). Determining Sample Size. Fact Sheet PEOD-6. University of Florida.Google Scholar
  5. Lemon, A. (1991). The Apartheid City, in Homes Apart: South Africa’s Segregated Cities. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Proshansky, H.M. and Fabian, A.K. (1986). Psychological Aspects of Quality of Urban Life. In Frick, D. (ed.), The Quality of Urban Life. New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp.—19–29, cited in Sirgy, M.J., Rahtz, D.R., Cicic, M., and Underwood, R. (eds.), A method of assessing residents’ satisfaction with community-based services: a quality of life perspective. Social Indicators Research, 49:279–316.Google Scholar
  7. Smith, D.M. (2003). Urban fragmentation, inequality and social justice: ethical perspectives. In Harrison, P., Huchzermeyer, M., and Mayekiso, M. (eds.), Confronting Fragmentation: Housing and Urban Development in a Democratic Society. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
  8. Stats SA, Census 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Watts, H.L. and Agar-Hamilton, J.A.I. (1970). Border Port: A study of East London, South Africa, with Special Reference to the White Population. Occasional Paper Number Thirteen. Grahamstown: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Rhodes University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin Richards
    • 1
  • Ellen Kamman
    • 2
  1. 1.Community Agency for Social Enquiry (CASE)Johannesburg
  2. 2.Fort Hare Institute of Social and Economic Research (FHISER)University of Fort Hare

Personalised recommendations