Advertisement

Perception and Evaluation of the Quality of Life in Florence, Italy

  • Filomena Maggino
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 28)

In 2003, the City of Florence (Italy) in conjunction with the Department of Statistics at the University of Florence conducted research regarding the citizens’ perception and evaluation of the quality of life (QOL) in the city of Florence. The focus of the study was to identify residents’ needs and develop programs and policies to enhance their QOL. The study also attempted to develop specific indicators of QOL aimed at measuring and assessing the levels of suitability of the living conditions that the city of Florence offers to its inhabitants.

Keywords

Cultural Dimension Cronbach Alpha Composite Indicator Professional Condition Personal Safety 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldenderfer, M.S. and Blashfield, R.K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, series no.—07–044. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bramston, P., Pretty, G., and Chipuer, H. (2002). Unravelling subjective quality of life: an investigation of individual and community determinants. Social Indicators Research, 59(3):261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christakopoulou, S., Dawson, J., and Gari, A. (2001). The community well-being questionnaire: theoretical context and initial assessment of its reliability and validity. Social Indicators Research, 56(3):319–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Del Vecchio, F. (1995). Scale di misura e indicatori sociali. Bari: Caccucci.Google Scholar
  5. Horn, R.V. (1993). Statistical Indicators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Lis, A. and Sambin, M. (1977). Analisi dei cluster. Padova: CLEUP.Google Scholar
  7. Michalos, A.C. (2003). Policing services and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 61(1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Michalos, A.C. (2005). Arts and the quality of life: an exploratory study. Social Indicators Research, 71(1):11–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Michalos, A.C. and Zumbo, B.D. (1999). Public services and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 48(2):125–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schifini, S. (1996). Teoria degli indicatori sociali. In Strassoldo, M., Mattioli, E., and Schifini, S. (eds.), Teoria dei numeri indici dei prezzi e degli indicatori economici, finanziari e sociali. Padova: CEDAM.Google Scholar
  11. Sirgy, M.J. and Cornwell, T. (2001). Further validation of the Sirgy et—al’.s measure of community quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 56(2):125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sirgy, M.J., Rahtz, D.R., Cicic, M., and Underwood, R. (2000). Underwood, a method for assessing residents’ satisfaction with community-based services: a quality-of-life perspective. Social Indicators Research, 49(3):279–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filomena Maggino
    • 1
  1. 1.Researcher and Professor of Social StatisticsUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations