Genetically Transformed Healthcare: Healthy Children and Parents

  • Enzo A. Palombo
  • Mrinal Bhave
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 30)

Recent developments in the fields of molecular biology and genetics have led to great advances in our understanding of how our genetic material, DNA, controls and determines our individual characteristics. With increasing awareness of the benefits that these developments will bring, particularly improved and novel medical treatments, there is no doubt that there will be positive impacts on the healthcare of adults and children. We must, nonetheless, be conscious of the fact that society is concerned about the ethical implications of some aspects of these technologies. In particular, rapid developments in the areas of genetic screening, cloning, and other reproductive technologies have the capacity to bring amazing outcomes, but they are also capable of dividing society. This review will examine the areas of genetic screening, genetic counselling, and related ethical, legal, and social issues from the Australian perspective.


Genetic Testing Genetic Counselling Down Syndrome Life Insurance Genetic Screening 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Watson, J. D. and Crick, F. H. C. 1953. A structure for deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature 171: 737–738.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stent, G. S. 1995. The aperiodic crystal of heredity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 758: 25–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mattick, J. S. 2003. The human genome and the future of medicine. Medical Journal of Australia 179: 212–216; The Human Genome. 2001. Nature 409: 745–952; The Human Genome. 2001. Science 291: 1145–1434.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Investment and Financial Services Association. 2002. IFSA Standard No. 11.00. Genetic testing policy, available at <>.
  5. 5.
    Human Genetics Society of Australasia. 2004, available at <>, cited 20 February 2004.
  6. 6.
    Gaff, C., Newstead, J., and Metcalfe, S. 2003. The genetics file: a resource for general practitioners. Victorian Department of Human Services, available at <http://murdoch.rch.>.
  7. 7.
    See note 5.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trent, R. J. A, Williamson, R., and Sutherland, G. R. 2003. The ‘‘new genetics’’ and clinical practice. Medical Journal of Australia 178: 406–409.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McLennan, A. 2003. Advances in prenatal screening. Australian Family Physician 32: 107–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monash IVF. 2003, available at <>, cited March 2004.
  11. 11.
    The Age. 9 March 2003. Boy’s survival depends on unborn brother, available at <>.
  12. 12.
    Genetic Health Services Victoria, available at <>, cited March 2004.
  13. 13.
    Savulescu, J. 2001. Predictive genetic testing in children. Medical Journal of Australia 175: 379–381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    See note 5.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC). 2003. ALRC Report 96: Essentially Yours: The Protection of Human Genetic Information in Australia, 321–331, available at <http://>.
  17. 17.
    Glasson, E. J., Sullivan, S. G., Hussain, R., Petterson, B. A., Montgomery, P. D., and Bittles, A. H. 2002. The changing survival profile of people with Down’s syndrome: implications for genetic counselling. Clinical Genetics 62: 390–393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    See note. 9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    See note 6.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    See note 9.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Findlay, I., Matthews, P., and Quirke, P. 1998. Multiple genetic diagnoses from single cells using multiplex PCR: reliability and allele dropout. Prenatal Diagnosis 18: 1413–1421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    See note 9.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Sudbery, P. 1998. Human Molecular Genetics. Essex, England: Addison Wesley Longman, 100–102.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barlow-Stewart, K., Burnett, L., Proos, A., Howell, V., Huq, F., Lazarus, R., and Aizenberg, H. 2003. A genetic screening programme for Tay-Sachs disease and cystic fibrosis for Australian Jewish high school students. Journal of Medical Genetics 40: e45, available at <>.
  29. 29.
    Ibid., 12.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ibid., 16, 615–636.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gertig, D. M., Hopper, J. L., and Allen, K. J. 2003. Population genetic screening for hereditary haemochromatosis. Medical Journal of Australia 179: 517–518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ibid.; Gertig, D. M., Fletcher, A., and Hopper, J. L 2002. Public health aspects of genetic screening for hereditary haemochromatosis in Australia. Australia New Zealand Journal of Public Health 26: 518–524; Barlow-Stewart et al., ibid.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Haan, E. A. 2003. The clinical geneticist and the ‘‘new genetics.’’ Medical Journal of Australia 178: 458–462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Otlowski, M. F. A. and Williamson, R. 2003. Ethical and legal issues and the ‘‘new genetics.’’ Medical Journal of Australia 178: 582–585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    See note 16.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    See note 6.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    See note 33.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
    Thomson, C. J. H. 2003. Confidentiality and privacy: beyond legal duties. Medical Journal of Australia 178: 252–253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    See note 34.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
    Lynch, E. L., Doherty, R. J., Gaff, C. L., Macrae, F. A., and Lindeman, G. J. 2003. ‘‘Cancer in the family’’ and genetic testing: implications for life insurance. Medical Journal of Australia 179: 480–483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    See note 34.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Panegyres, P. K., Goldblatt, J., Walpole, I., Connor, C., Liebeck, T., and Harrop, K. 2000. Genetic testing for Alzheimer’s disease. Medical Journal of Australia 172: 339–343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Spencer, C. A. 2004. Genetic testimony: a guide to forensic DNA profiling. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    See note 16, 261–288.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ibid., 321–331; 739–755.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC), 2004. Gene patents and the healthcare system. In: Final Report Alrc 99: Genes and Ingenuity: Gene Patenting and Human Health, available at <>.
  49. 49.
    Walpole, I. R., Dawkins, H. J. S., Sinden, P. D., and O’Leary, P. C. 2003. Human gene patents: the possible impacts on genetic services healthcare. Medical Journal of Australia 179: 203–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    See note 48.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Otlowski, M. F., Taylor, S. D., and Barlow-Stewart, K. K. 2002. Major study commencing into genetic discrimination in Australia. Journal of Law and Medicine 10: 41–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    See note 4.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    See note 16, 739–755.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    See note 6; note 8; note 27.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Meiser, B., Eisenbruch, M., Barlow-Stewart, K., Tucker, K., Steel, Z., and Goldstein, D. 2001. Cultural aspects of cancer genetics: setting a research agenda. Journal of Medical Genetics 38: 425–429; note 6; note 8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mattick, J. S. 2003. The human genome and the future of medicine. Medical Journal of Australia 179: 212–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enzo A. Palombo
    • 1
  • Mrinal Bhave
    • 2
  1. 1.Environment and Biotechnology CentreSwinburne University of TechnologyVICAustralia
  2. 2.Life and Social SciencesSwinburne University of TechnologyVICAustralia

Personalised recommendations