In chapter 1, section 5, sentences of the kind «… is ambiguous» were given a normative definition by means of the definiens expression «There is at least one pair of instances of «…» such that the first member of the pair expresses a different meaning from the second». In this normative definition, implicit reference is made to the total class of instances of «…». By (4) and (5) in section 5, hypotheses were formulated according to which instances of an expression «a» belonging to a certain subclass G1 of the total class always express a different meaning from instances of «a» belonging to a second subclass G2. As introduced in section 5, an ambiguity hypothesis asserts the existence of a pair of instances of an expression, the members of which express different meanings. It is introduced as a function of one argument.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2005). Basic Terms Continued. In: Drengson, A. (eds) The Selected Works of Arne Naess. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3727-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4519-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)