Plant performance in a warmer world: general responses of plants from cold, northern biomes and the importance of winter and spring events

  • R. Aerts
  • J. H. C. Cornelissen
  • E. Dorrepaal
Chapter
Part of the Tasks for vegetation science book series (TAVS, volume 41)

Abstract

During the past three decades the Earth has warmed with a rate unprecedented during the past 1000 years. There is already ample evidence that this fast climate warming has affected a broad range of organisms, including plants. Plants from high-latitude and high-altitude sites (‘cold biomes’) are especially sensitive to climate warming. In this paper we (1) review the response in the phenology of plants, changes in their range and distribution, soil nutrient availability, and the effects on the structure and dynamics of plant communities for cold, northern biomes; and (2) we show, by using data from an ongoing snow and temperature manipulation experiment in northern Sweden, that also winter and spring events have a profound influence on plant performance. Both long-term phenological data sets, experimental warming studies (performed in summer or year-round), natural gradient studies and satellite images show that key phenological events are responsive to temperature increases and that recent climate warming does indeed lead to changes in plant phenology. However, data from a warming and snow manipulation study that we are conducting in northern Sweden show that plants respond differently to the various climatic scenarios that we had imposed on these species and that especially winter and spring events have a profound impact. This indicates that it is necessary to include several scenarios of both summer and winter climate change in experimental climate change studies, and that we need detailed projections of future climate at a regional scale to be able to assess their impacts on natural ecosystems. There is also ample evidence that the range shift of herbs and shrubs to more northern regions is for the vast majority of species mainly caused by changes in the climate. This is in line with the observed ‘up-greening’ of northern tundra sites. These rapid northern shifts in distribution of plants as a result of climate warming may have substantial consequences for the structure and dynamics of high-latitude ecosystems. An analysis of warming studies at 9 tundra sites shows that heating during at least 3 years increased net N-mineralization from 0.32±0.31 (SE) g N m−2 yr−1 in the controls to 0.53±0.31 (SE) g N m−2 yr−1 in the heated plots (p<0.05), an increase of about 70%. Thus, warming leads to higher N availability in high-latitude northern tundra sites, but the variability is substantial. Higher nutrient availability affects in turn the species composition of high-latitude sites, which has important consequences for the carbon and water balance of these systems.

Key words

Climate warming Nutrient availability Peatlands Phenology Sphagnum Tundra 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aerts R. and Chapin F.S. 2000. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv. Ecol. Res. 30: 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aerts R., Wallén B. and Malmer N. 1992. Growth-limiting nutrients in Sphagnum-dominated bogs subject to low and high atmospheric nitrogen supply. J. Ecol. 80: 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aerts R., Cornelissen J.H.C., Dorrepaal E., van Logtestijn R.S.P. and Callaghan T.V. 2004. Effects of experimentally imposed climate scenarios on flowering phenology and flower production of sub-arctic bog species. Global Change Biology 10: 1599–1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arft A.M., Walker M.D. and Gurevitch J. et al. 1999. Response patterns of tundra plant species to experimental warming: a meta-analysis of the International Tundra Experiment. Ecol. Monogr. 69: 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosy J.L. and Reader R.J. 1995. Mechanisms underlying the suppression on forb seedling emergence by grass (Poa pratensis) litter. Funct. Ecol. 9: 635–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callaghan T.V. et al. 1992. Clonal plants and environmental change: introduction to the proceedings and summary. Oikos 63: 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callaghan T.V. and Jonasson S. 1995. Arctic terrestrial ecosystems and environmental change. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 352: 259–276.Google Scholar
  8. Chapin F.S., Bret-Harte M.S., Hobbie S.E. and Zhong H. 1996. Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation to global change. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. van Cleve K. and Alexander V. 1981. Nitrogen cycling in tundra and boreal ecosystems. In: van Clark F.E. and Roswall T. (eds.), Terrestrial Nitrogen Cycles, Ecological Bulletins, Stockholm, pp. 375–404.Google Scholar
  10. Cornelissen J.H.C. 1996. An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types. J. Ecol. 84: 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornelissen J.H.C., Callaghan T.V., Alatalo J.M., Michelsen A., Graglia E., Hartley A.E., Hik D.S., Hobbie S.E., Press M.C., Robinson C.H., Henry G.H.R., Shaver G.R., Phoenix G.K., Gwynn Jones D., Jonasson S., Chapin F.S. III, Molau U., Neill C., Lee J.A., Melillo J.M., Sveinbjörnsson B. and Aerts R. 2001. Global change and arctic ecosystems: is lichen decline a function of increases in vascular plant biomass? J. Ecol. 89: 984–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dorrepaal E., Aerts R., Cornelissen J.H.C., Callaghan T.V. and van Logtestijn R.S.P. 2003. Summer warming and increased winter snow cover affect Sphagnum fuscum growth, structure and production in a sub-arctic bog. Glob. Change Biol. 10: 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dukes J.S. and Mooney H.A. 1999. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders?. Trend. Ecol. Evol. 14: 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunne J.A., Harte J. and Taylor K.J. 2003. Subalpine meadow flowering phenology responses to climate change: integrating experimental and gradient methods. Ecological Monographs 73: 69–86.Google Scholar
  15. Gorham E. 1991. Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecological Applications 1: 182–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grabherr G., Gottfried M. and Pauli H. 1994. Climate effects on mountain plants. Nature 369: 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graglia E., Jonasson S., Michelsen A., Schmidt I.K., Havström M. and Gustavsson L. 2001. Effects of environmental perturbations on abundance of subarctic plants after three, seven and ten years of treatments. Ecography 24: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartley A.E., Neill C., Melillo J.M., Crabtree R. and Bowles F.P. 1999. Plant performance and soil nitrogen mineralization in response to simulated climate change in subarctic dwarf shrub heath. Oikos 86: 331–343.Google Scholar
  19. Heijmans M.M.P.D., Arp W.J. and Chapin F.S. 2004. Controls on moss evaporation in a boreal black spruce forest. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 18: 1524–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hobbie S.E. 1996. Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecol. Monogr. 6: 503–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Houghton J.T., Ding Y. and Griggs D.J. et al. 2001. Climate Change 2001: the Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeThird IPCC Report.Google Scholar
  22. Jonasson S. 1983. Nutrient content and dynamics in north Swedish shrub tundra areas. Holarctic Ecol. 6: 295–304.Google Scholar
  23. Jonasson S., Havström M., Jensen M. and Callaghan T.V. 1993. In situ mineralization of nitrogen and phosphorus of arctic soils after perturbations simulating climate change. Oecologia 95: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jonasson S., Michelsen M., Schmidt I.K., Nielsen E.V. and Callaghan T.V. 1996. Microbial biomass C, N and P in two arctic soils and responses to addition of NPK fertilizer and sugar: implications for plant nutrient uptake. Oecologia 106: 507–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson L.C. and Damman A.W.H. 1993. Decay and its regulation in Sphagnum peatlands. Adv. Bryol. 5: 249–296.Google Scholar
  26. Karlsson P.S. and Callaghan T.V. 1996. Plant ecology in the subarctic Swedish Lapland. Ecol. Bull. 45: 1–227.Google Scholar
  27. Keeling C.D., Chin J.F.S. and Whorf T.P. 1996. Increased activity of northern vegetation inferred from atmospheric CO2 measurements. Nature 382: 146–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kennedy A.D. 1995. Antarctic terrestrial ecosystem response to global environmental change. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 683–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kullman L. 2001. 20th century climate warming and tree-limit rise in the southern Scandes of Sweden. Ambio 30: 72–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. MacGillivray C.W., Grime J.P., Band S.R., Booth R.E., Campbell B., Hendry G.A.F., Hillier H., Hodgson J.G., Hunt R., Jalili A., Mackey J.M.L., Mowforth M.A., Neal A.M., Reader R., Rorison I.H., Spencer R.E., Thompson K. and Thorpe P.C. 1995. Testing predictions of the resistance and resilience of vegetation subjected to extreme events. Funct. Ecol. 9: 640–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marion G.M., Henry G.H.R. and Freckman D.W. et al. 1997. Open-top designs for manipulating field temperature in highlatitude ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 3(Suppl. 1): 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meshinev T., Apostolova I. and Koleva E. 2000. Influence of warming on timberline rising: a case study on Pinus peuce Griseb. in Bulgaria. Phytocoenologia 30: 431–438.Google Scholar
  33. Molau U. 1997. Responses to natural climatic variation and experimental warming in two tundra plant species with contrasting life forms: Cassiope tetragona and Ranunculus nivalis. Glob. Change Biol. 3(Supplement 1): 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Molau U. and Shaver G.R. 1997. Controls on seed production and seed germinability in Eriophorum vaginatum. Glob. Change Biol. 3(Suppl. 1): 80–88.Google Scholar
  35. Myneni R.B. Keeling C.D., Tucker C.J., Asrar G. and Nemani R.R. 1997. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386: 698–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oberbauer S.F., Starr G. and Popp E.W. 1998. Effects of extended growing season and soil warming on carbon dioxide and methane exchange of tussock tundra in Alaska. J. Geophys. Res. 103: 29075–29082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parmesan C. and Yohe G. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parsons A.N., Welker J.M., Wookey P.A., Press, M.C., Callaghan T.V. and Lee J.A. 1994. Growth-response of four sub-arctic dwarf shrubs to simulated environmental change. J. Ecol. 82: 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parsons A.N., Press M.C., Wookey P.A., Welker J.M., Robinson C.H., Callaghan T.V. and Lee J.A. 1995. Growth responses of Calamagrostis lapponica to simulated environmental change in the sub-arctic. Oikos 72: 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Press M.C., Potter J.A., Burke M.J.W., Callaghan T.V. and Lee J.A. 1998. Responses of a subarctic dwarf shrub heath community to simulated environmental change. J. Ecol. 86: 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Quested H.M., Cornelissen J.H.C., Press M.C, Callaghan T.V., Aerts R, Trosien F., Riemann P., Gwynn-Jones D., Kondratchuk A. and Jonasson S. 2003. Decomposition of subarctic plants with differing nitrogen economies: a functional role for hemiparasites. Ecology 84: 3209–3221.Google Scholar
  42. Richardson S.J., Press M.C., Parsons A.N. and Hartley S.E. 2002. How do nutrients and warming impact on plant communities and their insect herbivores. A 9-year study from a sub-arctic heath. J. Ecol. 90: 544–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robinson C.H. 2002. Controls on decomposition and soil nitrogen availability at high latitudes. Plant Soil 242: 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson C.H., Wookey P.A., Parsons A.N., Potter J.A., Lee J.A., Callaghan T.V., Press M.C. and Welker J.M. 1995. Responses of plant litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization to simulated environmental change in a high arctic polar semi-desert and a subarctic dwarf shrub heath. Oikos 74: 503–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robinson C.H., Wookey P.A., Lee J.A., Callaghan T.V. and Press M.C. 1998. Plant community responses to simulated environmental change at a high arctic polar semi-desert. Ecology 79: 856–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Root T.L., Price J.T., Hall K.R., Schneider S.H., Rosenzweig C. and Pounds J.A. 2003. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421: 57–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rustad L.E., Campbell J.L. and Marion G.M. et al. 2001. A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126: 543–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmidt I.K., Jonasson S. and Michelsen A 1999. Mineralisation and microbial immobilisation of N and P in arctic soils in relation to season, temperature and nutrient amendment. Appl. Soil Ecol. 11: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shaver G.R. and Kummerov J. 1992. Phenology, resource allocation, and growth of arctic vascular plants. In: Chapin F.S., Jefferies R.L. and Reynolds J.F. (eds.), et al. Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate: an Ecophysiological Perspective, Academic Press, New York, pp. 191–212.Google Scholar
  50. Shaver G.R. and Chapin F.S. 1995. Long-term responses to factorial NPK fertilizer treatment by Alaskan wet and moist tundra sedge species. Ecography 18: 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shaver G.R., Bret-Harte M.S., Jones M.H., Johnstone J., Gough L., Laundre J. and Chapin F.S. 2001. Species composition interacts with fertilizer to control long-term vegetation change in tundra productivity. Ecology 82: 3163–3181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith R.I.L. 1996. Introduced plants in Antarctica: potential impacts and conservation issues. Biol. Conserv. 76: 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stenström M., Gugerli F. and Henry G.H.R. 1997. Response of Saxifraga oppositifolia to simulated climate change at three contrasting latitudes. Glob. Change Biol. 3(Supplement 1): 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sturm M., Racine C. and Tape K. 2001. Increasing shrub abundance in the arctic. Nature 411: 546–547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tenhunen J.D. et al. 1992. The ecosystem role of poikilohydric tundra plants. In: Chapin F.S. (ed.), et al. Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate: An Ecophysiological Perspective, Academic Press, New York, pp. 213–237.Google Scholar
  56. Thomas C.D., Cameron A., Green R.E., Bakkenes M., Beaumont L.J., Collingham I.C., Erasmus B.F.N., Ferreirade Siqueira M., Grainger A., Hannah L., Hughes L., Huntley B., van Jaarsveld A.S., Midgley G.F., Miles L., Ortega-Huerta M.A., Peterson A.T., Phillips O.L. and Williams S.E. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van der Wal R. and Brooker R.W. 2004. Mosses mediate grazer impacts on grass abundance in arctic ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 18: 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walther G.-R. 2000. Climatic forcing on the dispersal of exotic species. Phytocoenologia 30: 409–430.Google Scholar
  59. Walther G.-R., Post E., Convey P., Menzel A., Parmesan C., Beebee T.J.C., Fromentin J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg O. and Bairlein F. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416: 389–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wardle P. and Coleman M.C. 1992. Evidence for rising upper limits of four native New Zealand forest trees. N.Z. J. Bot. 30: 303–314.Google Scholar
  61. Wijk M.T. van, Williams M., Laundre J.A. and Shaver G.R. 2003. Interannual variability of plant phenology in tussock tundra: modelling interactions of plant productivity, plant phenology, snowmelt and soil thaw. Glob. Change Biol. 9: 743–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wijk M.T. van, Clemmensen K.E., Shaver G.R., Williams M., Callaghan T.V., Chapin F.S. and Cornelissen J.H.C. et al. 2004. Long-term ecosystem level experiments at Toolik Lake, Alaska, and at Abisko, Northern Sweden: generalizations and differences in ecosystem and plant type responses to global change. Glob. Change Biol. 10: 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Woodward F.I. 1987. Climate and Plant Distribution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  64. Wookey P.A., Welker J.M., Parson A.N., Press M.C., Callaghan T.V. and Lee J.A. 1994. Differential growth, allocation and photosynthetic responses of Polygonum viviparum to simulated environmental change at a high arctic polar semidesert. Oikos 70: 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wookey P.A., Robinson C.H., Parsons A.N., Welker J.M., Press M.C., Callaghan T.V. and Lee J.A. 1995. Environmental constraints on the growth, photosynthesis and reproductive development of Dryas octopetala at a high arctic polar semidesert, Svalbard. Oecologia 102: 478–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhou L.M., Tucker C.J., Kaufmann R.K., Slayback D., Shabanov N.V. and Myneni R.B. 2001. Variations in northern vegetation activity inferred from satellite data of vegetation index during 1981 to 1999. J. Geophys. Res. — Atmos. 106: 20069–20083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Aerts
    • 1
  • J. H. C. Cornelissen
    • 1
  • E. Dorrepaal
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Ecological Science, Department of Systems EcologyVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations