Skip to main content

The Role of Value Systems in Biodiversity Research

  • Chapter
Book cover A Changing World

Part of the book series: Landscape Series ((LAEC,volume 8))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bauer N. 2005.Attitudes towards wilderness and public demands on wilderness areas. In: Kowarik I., Starfinger U. and Oggendorf P. (eds.), Wild forests in the city. Postindustrial urban landscapes of tomorrow. Berlin, Springer: pp. 47-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baur P. 2003. Milch und Blumen - Schritte auf dem Weg zur Professionalisierung von ökolo-gischen Leistungen durch die Landwirtschaft. In R. Oppermann H.U. and Guyer (eds.), Artenreiches Grünland bewerten und fördern - MEKA und ÖQV in der Praxis. Stuttgart, Verlag Eugen Ulmer: pp. 160-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett D. 1994.The unique contribution of wilderness to values of nature. Natural Areas Journal 14: 203-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell G.M. 1986. Coping with threatened identity. London, Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist E. 2004. Against the social construction of nature and wilderness. Environmental Ethics 26: 5-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropp R. and Gabric A. 2002. Ecosystem adaptation: Do ecosystems maximize resilience? Ecology 83: 2019-2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waard R.S. 2002. Planning with SpaceUseForms in the region of Breda-Tilburg. Habiforum 2002: 1101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duelli P. 1997. Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: an approach at two different scales. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 62: 81-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duelli P. and Obrist M.K. 2003a. Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 98: 87-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duelli P. and Obrist M.K. 2003b. Monitoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: the dilemma of conflicting value systems and indicators. In:Tack J., Branquart E., Caudron A. and Segers H. (eds.): Scientific tools for biodiversity conservation: monitoring, modeling and experiments. Brussels: pp. 170-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC 2001. Environment 2010: our future, our choice. EC, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M. and Ajzen L. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An Introduction to the theory and research. Reading MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey B.S. 1992. Economics as a science of human behaviour: Towards a new social science para-digm. Boston, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J. and Spicer J.I. 2004. Biodiversity: An introduction. Malden, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk D.R. and Paterson R.G. 1999. Collaborative conflict management comes of age. Journal of architectoral and planning research 16: 91-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson P. 2000. Meaning of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualization. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 5-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampicke U. 1991. Naturschutzökonomie. Stuttgart, Verlag Eugen Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen D. 1998. Gardenification of wildland nature and the human footprint. Science 279: 1312-1313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jedicke E. 1994. Biotopverbund. Grundlagen und Massnahmen einer neuen Naturschutzstrategie. Stuttgart, Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas H. 1997. Die Entstehung der Werte. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klages H. 1999.Wertewandel und bürgerliches Engagement an der Schwelle zum 21. Jahrhundert. Speyerer Forschungsberichte: 193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D. and Sutherland W.J. 2003. How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 947-969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korneck D., Schnittler M., Klingenstein F., Ludwig G.,Takla M., Bohn U. and May R. 1998. Warum verarmt unsere Flora? Auswertung der Roten Liste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 29: 299-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T.S. 1970. Logic of discovery or the psychology of research? In: Lakatos I.M. (ed), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M. 2004: Does functional redundancy exist? Oikos 104: 606-611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R.H. and Wilson E.O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschall I. and Bruns D. 2002. Functional change and idealisation of hedges in the agricultural landscape. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 34: 113-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsch J. 1997. Nachhaltigkeit und institutionelle Innovationen. In: K. Rennings, O. Hohmeyer (eds.) Nachhaltigkeit. Baden-Baden, Nomos: 297-329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S. and Li S. 1997. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390: 507-509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nobis M. and Wohlgemuth T. 2004. Trend words in ecological core journals over the last 25 years (1978-2002). Oikos 106: 411-421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister C. 1997. Landschaftsveränderung und Identitätsverlust. Traverse 2: 49-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm S.L. 1991. The balance of nature? Ecological issues in the conservation of species and com-munities. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler A. and Borlea F. 1998. Lessons from natural forests as keys for sustainable management and improvement of naturalness in managed broadleaved forests. Forest Ecology and Management 10: 293-303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D.S. 1982. Refuge design and island biogeographic theory: Effects of fragmentation. American Naturalist 120: 41-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. 1989. Sources of the self: The making of a modern identity. Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED, 1987: Our common future. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgemuth T., Bürgi M., Scheidegger C. and Schütz M. 2002. Dominance reduction of species through disturbance - a proposed management principle for central European forests. Forest Ecology and Management 166: 1-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwölfer H. and Stechmann D.H. 1989. Struktur und Funktion von Hecken in tierökologischer Sicht. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie 17: 643-656.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duelli, P., Baur, P., Buchecker, M., Gugerli, F., Holderegger, R., Wohlgemuth, T. (2007). The Role of Value Systems in Biodiversity Research. In: Kienast, F., Wildi, O., Ghosh, S. (eds) A Changing World. Landscape Series, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4436-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics