Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Backpropagation techniques in ocean acoustic inversion: time reversal, retrogation and adjoint model – A review

  • Chapter
Book cover Acoustic Sensing Techniques for the Shallow Water Environment

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Parvulescu A., Signal detection in a multipath medium by M.E.S.S. processing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 33(11):1674, November (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parvulescu A. and Clay C.S., Reproducibility of signal transmissions in the ocean. Radio Elec. Eng., 29:223-28 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Parvulescu A., Matched signal MESS” processing by the ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 98(2):943-60, November (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bucker H.P., Use of calculated sound fields and matched-field detection to locate sound sources in shallow water. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 59(2):368-373 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tolstoy A., Matched Field Processing for Underwater Acoustics. World Scientific, Singapore (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baggeroer A.B., Kuperman W.A. and Mikhalevsky P.N., An overview of matched field processing in ocean acoustics. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 18(4):401-24, October (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson J.H., Rajan S.D. and Null J.M, editors. Inverse techniques and the variability of sound propagation in shallow water. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., Special issue, 21(4), October (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chapman R.,Chin-Bin S., D. King and EvansR. editors. Geoacoustic inversion in rangedependent shallow water environments. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., Special issue (Pt.1), 28(3), July (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chapman R., Chin-Bin S., King D. and Evans R., editors. Geoacoustic inversion in rangedependent shallow water environments. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., Special issue (Pt.2), 29(1), January (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Diachok O., Caiti A., Gerstoft P. and Schmidt H., editors. Full field inversion methods in ocean and seismo acoustics, Norwell, MA, USA, and Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995. Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Caiti A., Hermand J.-P., Porter M.B. and Jesus S., editors. Experimental Acoustic Inversion Methods for Exploration of the Shallow Water Environment. Kluwer Academic (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Taroudakis M.I. and Markaki M.G., editors. Inverse Problems in Underwater Acoustics. Springer (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hermand J.-P. and Gerstoft P., Inversion of broad-band multitone acoustic data from the YELLOW SHARK summer experiments. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 21(4):324-46, October (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baggeroer A.B., Kuperman W.A. and Schmidt H., Matched field processing: Source localization in correlated noise as an optimum parameter estimation problem. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 83 (2):571-87 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Richardson A.M. and Nolte L.W., A posteriori probability source localization in an uncertain sound speed, deep ocean environment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 89(5):2280-2284 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krolik J.L., Matched-field minimum variance beamforming in a random ocean channel. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 92(3):1408-1419 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Michalopoulou Z.-H. and Porter M.B., Matched-field processing for broad-band source localization. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 21(4):384-92, October (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O i G.J. Nicholas M. and Perkins J.S., The matched-phase coherent multi-frequency matched-field processor. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 107(5):2563-75 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soares C. and Jesus S.M., Broadband matched field processing: Coherent and incoherent approaches. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 113(5):2587-98, May (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hermand J.-P. and Roderick W.I., Acoustic model-based matched filter processing for fading time-dispersive ocean channels: Theory and experiment. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 18(4):447-465, October (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tappert F.D., Nghiem-Phu L. and Daubin S.C., Source localization using the PE method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 78(S1):S30 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nghiem-Phu L. and F.D. Tappert, Modeling of reciprocity in the time domain using the parabolic equation method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 78(1):164-71, July (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nghiem-Phu L. and F.D. Tappert, Parabolic equation modeling of the effects of ocean currents on sound transmission and reciprocity in the time domain. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 78(2):642-48, August (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thomson D.J., Ebbeson G.R. and Maranda B.H., A matched field backpropagation algorithm for source localization. In Proceedings of MTS/IEEE Oceans 1997, volume 1, pages 602-607, Washington, DC, (1997). Marine Technol. Soc.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thomson D.J., Ebbeson G.R. and Maranda B.H., A parabolic equation based backpropagation algorithm for matched field processing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103(5):2821, May (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomson D.J. and Ebbeson G.R., A backpropagated PE method for matched field and matched mode localization. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theoretical and Computational Acoustics. Hawaii, USA (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  27. I-Tai Lu and Voltz P., A back-propagating ray technique for source localization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 91(4):2366-2366 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Voltz P. and I-Tai Lu., A time-domain backpropagating ray technique for source localization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 95(2):805-812 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Collins M.D. and Kuperman W.A., Focalization: Environmental focusing and source localization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 90(3):1410-1422, September (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Collins M.D. and Baer R.N., Focalization in the presence of internal waves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 114(4):2401, October (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dizaji R.M., Chapman N.R. and Kirlin R.L., Geoacoustic parameter estimation using back wave propagation technique. In M. Meng, editor, Proceedings of the IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, volume 3, pages 1547-52. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dizaji R.M., Chapman N.R. and Kirlin R.L., A phase regulated back wave propagation technique for geoacoustic inversion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 111(2):800-8, February (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ozard J.M., Yeremy M.L., Chapman N.R. and Wilmut M.J., Matched-field processing in a range-dependent shallow water environment in the northeast pacific ocean. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 21(4):377-83, October (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gerstoft P., Hodgkiss W.S., Kuperman W.A., and Song H., Phenomenological and global optimization inversion. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., April (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jackson D.R. and Dowling D.R., Phase conjugation in underwater acoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 89(1):171-181 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kuperman W.A., Hodgkiss W.S., Song H.C., Akal T., Ferla C. and Jackson D.R., Phase conjugation in the ocean: Experimental demonstration of an acoustic time-reversal mirror. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103(1):25-40 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hodgkiss W.S., Song H.C., Kuperman W.A., Akal T., Ferla C. and Jackson D.R., A long-range and variable focus phase conjugation experiment in shallow water. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 105:1597-1604 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Edelman G., Akal T., Hodgkiss W.S., Kim S., Kuperman W.A. and Song H.C., An initial demonstration of underwater acoustic communication using time reversal. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 27:602-609 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim S., Kuperman W.A., Hodgkiss W.S., Song H.C., Edelmann G.F. and Akal T., Robust time reversal focusing in the ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 114(1):145-157 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sabra K.G. and Dowling D.R., Effects of time-reversing array deformation in an ocean wave guide. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 115(6):2844-2847 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sabra K.G. and Dowling D.R., Broadband performance of a time reversing array with a moving source. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 115(6):2807-2817 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Song H.C., Kim S., Hodgkiss W.S. and Kuperman W.A., Environmentally adaptive reverberation nulling using a time reversal mirror. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 116(2):762-768 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sabra K., Roux P., Song H.-C., Hodgkiss W., Kuperman W., Akal T. and Stevenson M., Experimental demonstration of time reversed reverberation focusing in an oceanic waveguide. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 116(4):2526-2526 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Prada C., Wu F. and Fink M., The iterative time reversal mirror: A solution to self-focusing in the pulse echo mode. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 90(2):1119-1129 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Prada C., Manneville S., Spoliansky D. and Fink M., Decomposition of the time reversal operator: Detection and selective focusing on two scatterers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 99(4):2067-2076 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Song H.C., Kuperman W.A., Hodgkiss W.S., Akal T. and Ferla C., Iterative time reversal in the ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 105(6):3176-3184 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dowling D.R. , Acoustic pulse compression using passive phase-conjugate processing.J.Acoust. Soc. Am., 95(3):1450-1458 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rouseff D., Jackson D.R., Fox W.L.J., Jones C.D., Ritcey J.A. and Dowling D.R., Underwater acoustic communication by passive-phase conjugation: theory and experimental results. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 26(4):821-831 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Svensson E., Karasalo I. and Hermand J.-P., Time variability of an underwater acoustic channel. In Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, pages 2633-2642. International Institute of Acoustics and Vibration, July (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sabra K.G. and Dowling D.R., Blind deconvolution in ocean waveguides using artificial time reversal. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 116(1):262-271 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang T.C., Performance comparisons between passive-phase conjugation and decisionfeedback equalizer for underwater acoustic communications. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 115(5): 2505-2506 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rouseff D., Intersymbol interference in underwater acoustic communications using time reversal signal processing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 117(2):780-788 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Roux P., Kuperman W.A., Hodgkiss W.S., Song H.C., Akal T. and Stevenson M., A nonreciprocal implementation of time reversal in the ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 116(2):1009-1015 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hermand J.-P., A model-based acoustic time-reversal mirror for robust variable focusing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 110(5):2708: 3aSP8 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hermand J.-P., Model-based spatial diversity processing with sparse receive arrays: Application to coherent acoustic communication in shallow water. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, ECUA 2002, pages 289-294. Gdansk, Poland, September (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Candy J.V., Meyer A.W. Poggio A.J., and Guidry B.L., Time-reversal processing for an acoustic communications experiment in a highly reverberant environment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 115(4):1621-31, April (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Chambers D.H., Candy J.V., Lehmann S.K., Kallman J.S., Poggio A.J. and Meyer A.W., Time reversal and the spatio-temporal matched filter (L). J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 116(3):1348-50, September (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Clay C.S., Optimum time domain signal transmission and source localization in a waveguide. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 81(3):660-64 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hermand J.-P., Broad-band geoacoustic inversion in shallow water from waveguide impulse response measurements on a single hydrophone: Theory and experimental results. IEEEJ. Oceanic Eng., 24(1):41-66, January (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Michalopoulou Z.-H., Matched-impulse-response processing for shallow-water localization and geoacoustic inversion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 108(5):2082-90, November (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Le Gac J.-C., Asch M., Stéphan Y. and Demoulin X., Geoacoustic inversion of broadband acoustic data in shallow water on a single hydrophone. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., April (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Stéphan Y., Demoulin X., Folegot T., Jesus S.M., Porter M.B. and Coelho E., Acoustical effects of internal tides on shallow water propagation: an overview of the INTIMATE 96 experiment. In A. Caiti, J.P. Hermand, S.M. Jesus, and M.B. Porter, editors, Experimental Acoustic inversion methods for exploration of the shallow water environment, pages 19-38. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kalman R.E. and Bucy R.S., New results in linear filtering and prediction theory. Trans. Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng. J. Basic Engineering, 83:95-108 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Bellman R., Adaptive Control Process. Princeton University Press (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Gelfand I.M. and Fomin S.V., Calculus of Variations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Feldbaum A.A., Optimal Control Systems. Academic Press, New York (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Luenberger D.G., Optimization by Vector Space Methods. Wiley, New York (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kirk D.E., Optimal Control Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Jazwinski A.H., Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory. Academic Press, New York (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sage A.P. and Melsa J.L., Estimation Theory with Application to Communication and Control. McGraw-Hill, New York (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lions J.L., Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations, volume 170 of A series of comprehensive studies in mathematics. Springer Verlag, New York (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lions J.L., Exact controllability, stabilization and pertubations for distributed systems. SIAM Review, 30:71-86, March (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Candy J.V. and Sullivan E.J., Ocean acoustic signal processing: A model-based approach. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 92(6):3185-3201, December (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Sullivan E.J. and Candy J.V., Space-time array processing: The model-based approach. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 102(5):2809-20, November (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Candy J.V., Signal Processing: The Model-Based Approach. McGraw-Hill, New York (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Tarantola A., Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49:1259-1266 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Tarantola A., Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation. Elsevier, New York (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Talagrand O. and Courtier P., Les équations adjointes - Application à la modélisation numérique. Atelier modélisation de l'atmosphère, Direction de la météorologie, Toulouse, France (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Carthel C., Glowinski R. and Lions J.L., On exact and approximate boundary controllabilitiesfor the heat equation: A numerical approach. Journal of Optimization Theory and Aplications, 82(3):429-84 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Leredde Y., Lellouche J.-M., Devenon J.-L. and Dekeyser I., On initial, boundary conditions and viscosity coefficient control for Burgers' equation. Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 28(1998).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Sirkes Z. and Tziperman E., Finite difference of adjoint or adjoint of finite difference. MonthlyWeather Rev., 125:3373-3378 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Errico R.M., What is an adjoint model? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,78:2577-91 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Giles M.B. and Pierce N.A., An introduction to the adjoint approach to design. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 65:393-415 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Gillivray P.R. and Oldenburg D.W., Methods for calculating Fréchet derivatives and sensitivities for the non-linear inverse problem: A comparative study. Geophysical Prospecting, 38:499-524 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Norton S.J. Iterative inverse scattering algorithms: Methods of computing Fréchet derivatives. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 106(5):2653-60, November (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Norton S.J., Iterative algorithms for computing the shape of a hard scattering object: Computing the shape derivative. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 116(2):1002-08, August (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Le Gac J.-C., Stéphan Y., Asch M., Helluy P. and Hermand J.-P., A variational approach for geoacoustic inversion using adjoint modeling of a PE approximation model with non local impedance boundary conditions. In A. Tolstoy, Y.C. Teng, and E.C. Shang, editors, Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 2003, pages 254-263. World Scientific Publishing (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Hursky P., Porter M.B., Hodgkiss W.S. and Kuperman W.A., Adjoint modeling for acoustic inversion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 115(2):607-19 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Thode A., The derivative of a waveguide acoustic field with respect to a three-dimensional sound speed perturbation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 115(6):2824-33 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Thode A. and Kim K., Multiple-order derivatives of a waveguide acoustic field with respect to sound speed, density, and frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 116(6):3370-83 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Asch M., Le Gac J.-C. and Helluy P., An adjoint method for geoacoustic inversions. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Inverse Problems, Control and Shape Optimization. Carthage, Tunisia (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Meyer M., Hermand J.-P. and Asch M., Derivation of the adjoint of a wide angle parabolic equation for acoustic inversion. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, ECUA 2004, pages 727-32. Delft, The Netherlands, July (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Meyer M., Hermand J.-P., Le Gac J.-C. and Asch M., Penalization method for WAPE adjoint-based inversion of an acoustic field. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, ECUA 2004, pages 243-48. Delft, The Netherlands, July (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Meyer M. and Hermand J.-P., Optimal nonlocal boundary control of the wide-angle parabolic equation for inversion of a waveguide acoustic field. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 117(5):2937-48, May (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Holland C.W., Hermand J.-P. and Dosso S., Fine-grained sediment geoacoustic properties from remote acoustic measurements. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, ECUA 2004, pages 677-84. Delft, The Netherlands, July (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Yevick D. and Thomson D.J., Nonlocal boundary conditions for finite-difference parabolic equation solvers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 106(1):143-50, July (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Hydroacoustics Laboratory Department of Optics and Acoustics, Universite libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F. D. Roosevelt, 50 - CP 194/05, B-1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Matthias Meyer

  2. Environmental Hydroacoustics Laboratory Department of Optics and Acoustics, Universite libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F. D. Roosevelt, 50 - CP 194/05, B-1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Jean - Pierre Hermand

Authors
  1. Matthias Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean - Pierre Hermand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pisa, Italy

    Andrea Caiti

  2. University of Victoria, BC, Canada

    N. Ross Chapman

  3. Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium

    Jean-Pierre Hermand

  4. University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal

    Sérgio M. Jesus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meyer, M., Hermand, J . (2006). Backpropagation techniques in ocean acoustic inversion: time reversal, retrogation and adjoint model – A review. In: Caiti, A., Chapman, N.R., Hermand, JP., Jesus, S.M. (eds) Acoustic Sensing Techniques for the Shallow Water Environment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4386-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation