Advertisement

The Spatial and Temporal Nature of Urban Objects

Chapter
Part of the Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing book series (RDIP, volume 10)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to examine, from an application perspective, the utility of remote sensing to collect data on urban and suburban areas for Urban Planning and Management (UPM). Specifically, the chapter discusses the use of remote sensing at two different spatial levels, the information needs with respect to monitoring planned and unplanned development, and the optimal spatial and temporal requirements for images used in this regard.

Keywords

Urban Land Informal Settlement Site Development Land Occupation Urban Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbott J (2001) The use of spatial data to support the integration of informal settlements into the formal city. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinformatics 3:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson GL, Hardy EE, Roach JR, Witmer RE (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. USGS Professional Paper, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson PM, Curran PJ (1997) Choosing an appropriate spatial resolution for remote sensing investigations. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 63:1345–1351Google Scholar
  4. Barnsley MJ, Barr SL (1996) Inferring urban land use from satellite sensor image using kernel-based spatial reclassification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 62:949–958Google Scholar
  5. Baross P (1987) Land supply for low income housing: issues and approaches. Reg Dev Dialogue 8(4):29–45Google Scholar
  6. Baudot Y (2001) Geographical analysis of the population of fast-growing cities in the Third World. In: Donnay JP, Barnsley MJ, Longley PA (eds) Remote sensing and urban analysis. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M (2004) Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 58:239–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brussel MA, Belal WE, Rahman MM (2003) Extracting urban road information from IKONOS high resolution imagery. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference of urban remote sensing, Regensburg, Germany, 27–29 June 2003, pp 29–34Google Scholar
  9. Chen CM, Hepner GF, Forster RR (2003) Fusion of hyperspectral and radar data using IHS transformation to enhance urban surface features. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 58:19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coulter L, Stow D, Kiracofe B, Langevin C, Chen D, Daeschner S, Service D, Kaiser J (1999) Deriving current land-use information for metropolitan transportation planning through integration of remotely sensed data and GIS. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 65:1293–1300Google Scholar
  11. Cowen DJ, Jensen JR (1998) Extraction and modeling of urban attributes using remote sensing technology. In: Liverman D, Morna EF, Rindfuss RR, Stern PC (eds) People and pixels: linking remote sensing and social science. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 164–188Google Scholar
  12. Donnay JP, Barnsley MJ, Longley PA (2001) Remote sensing and urban analysis. In: Donnay JP, Barnsley MJ, Longley PA (eds) Remote sensing and urban analysis. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehlers M, Schiewe J, et al. (2002) Urban remote sensing: new developments and challenges. Remote Sensing of Urban Areas, Istanbul, Turkey. 11–13 June 2002, pp 130–137Google Scholar
  14. Forster BC (1985) An examination of some problems and solutions in monitoring urban areas from satellite platforms. Int J Remote Sens 6:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gluch R (2002) Urban growth detection using texture analysis on merged Landsat TM and SPOT-P data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68:1283–1288Google Scholar
  16. Gorte BGH (1998) Probabilistic segmentation of remotely sensed images. Published Ph.D. dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  17. Grey WMF, Luckman AJ, Holland D (2003) Mapping urban change in the UK using satellite radar interferometry. Remote Sens Environ 87:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hardoy JE, Satterthwaitec D (1989) Squatter citizen: life in the urban Third World. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris PM, Ventura SJ (1995) The integration of geographic data with remotely sensed imagery to improve classification in an urban area. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 61:993–998Google Scholar
  20. Herold M, Liu XH, Clarke KC (2003) Spatial metrics and image texture for mapping urban land use. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69:991–1001Google Scholar
  21. Hung MC, Ridd M (2002) A subpixel classifier for urban land-cover mapping based on a maximum-likelihood approach and expert system rules. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68:1173–1180Google Scholar
  22. Jensen JR, Cowen C (1999) Remote sensing of urban/suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 65:611–622Google Scholar
  23. Laurini R, Thompson D (1996) Fundamentals of spatial information systems. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Masser I (1986) Strategic monitoring for urban planning in developing countries: some guidelines from British and Dutch experience. Int J Inf Manag 6:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mesev V, Longley PA, Batty B, Xie Y (1995) Morphology from imagery: detecting and measuring the density of urban land use. Environ Plann A 27:759–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niebergall S, Loew A, Mauser W (2007) Object-oriented analysis of very high-resolution QuickBird data for mega city research in Delhi/India. In: Proceedings of urban remote sensing joint event 2007 (URS/URBAN), IEEE, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  27. Qiu F, Wolter KL, Briggs R (2003) Modelling urban population growth from remotely sensed imagery and TIGER GIS road data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69:1031–1042Google Scholar
  28. Radnaabazar G, Kuffer M, Hofstee P (2004) Monitoring the development of informal settlements in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. In: Proceedings of CORP2004, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, 25–28 Feb, pp 333–339Google Scholar
  29. Ridd M (1995) Exploring a V-I-S (Vegetation-Imperious Surface-Soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities. Int J Remote Sens 16:2165–2185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sliuzas RV (2001) Understanding the dynamics of informal housing in Dar es Salaam: an exploration of professional knowledge and opinions. TRIALOG 69(2):41–45Google Scholar
  31. Sliuzas RV (2004) Managing informal settlements: a study using geoinformation in Dar es Salaam. Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, TanzaniaGoogle Scholar
  32. Sliuzas RV, Brussel M (2000) Usability of large scale topographic data for urban planning and engineering applications: examples of housing studies and DEM generation in Tanzania. ISPRS, vol XXXIII, Part B4/3, Commission IV. Amsterdam, 16–23 JulyGoogle Scholar
  33. Sliuzas RV, Kerle N, Kuffer M (2008) Object-oriented mapping of urban poverty and deprivation. In: Proceedings Joint Workshop GISDECO 8 and EARSeL special interest group on developing countries, Istanbul, Turkey, 2–6 JuneGoogle Scholar
  34. Stabel E, Fischer P (2001) Satellite radar interferometric products for the urban application domain. Adv Environ Res 5:425–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steinle E, Baehr HP (2002) Detectability of urban changes from airborne laserscanning data. ISPRS, vol VII. Hyderabad, India, 3–6 Dec 2002Google Scholar
  36. Tao C, Li R, Chapman MA (1998) Automatic reconstruction of road centerlines from mobile mapping image sequences. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 64:709–715Google Scholar
  37. Thurston J (2002) GIS and remote sensing: new trends in feature and object recognition. http://www.integralgis.com/pdf/GIS%20and%20Remote%20Sensing.pdf. Accessed in Nov 2004
  38. Vosselman G, Kessels P, Gorte BGH (2005) The utilisation of airborne laser scanning for three-dimensional mapping. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 6:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weber C (2001) Urban agglomeration delimitation using remote sensing data. In: Donnay JP, Barnsley MJ, Longley PA (eds) Remote sensing and urban analysis. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Webster CJ (1995) Urban morphological fingerprint. Environ Plann B 23:279–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Welch R (1982) Spatial resolution requirement for urban studies. Int J Remote Sens 3:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Williamson I, Rajabifard A, Feeney MEF (eds) (2003) Developing spatial data infrastructures: from concept to reality. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Woodcock CE, Strahler AH (1987) The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 21:311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang X (2002) Satellite monitoring of urban spatial growth in the Atlanta metropolitan area. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68:725–734Google Scholar
  45. Yeh AGO, Li X (2001) Measurement and monitoring of urban sprawl in a rapidly growing region using entropy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 67:83–90Google Scholar
  46. Zhan Q (2003) A hierarchical object-based approach for urban land use classification from remote sensing data. Published Ph.D. thesis, Enschede, ITC, University of WageningenGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhan Q, Molenaar M, Tempfli K (2002) Hierarchical image-object based structural analysis toward urban land use classification using high-resolution imagery and airborne LIDAR data. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on remote sensing of urban areas, Istanbul, Turkey, 11–13 June 2002, pp 251–258Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation of the University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Centre for Advanced Spatial AnalysisUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations