Natural environments and the amenities they offer have fueled much of the population growth in the rural United States (Deller et al. 2001, English et al. 2000). In fact, the fastest growing counties in the United States during the early 1990s were non-metropolitan counties that were destinations for retirees or that offered outdoor recreation opportunities (Johnson and Beale 1994). Migration to these rural and exurban areas from urban and suburban locations, along with growth in the United States population, has resulted in an increased mixing of humans, their artifacts, and natural environments. These expanding interface and intermix areas expose more lives and property not only to desirable natural amenities, but also to natural disturbances and disamenities.
This chapter seeks to provide a basic framework for modeling the effects of forest and other natural disturbances on property markets. The modeling section will begin by introducing the hedonic property model in a simple, accessible format. Several important modeling issues and aspects of forest disturbances that make them special in regard to describing their impact on property markets will be discussed next. These include the tension between risks and amenities embodied in a forest resource, the temporal dynamics of disturbance manifestation, and spatial dependence among observed outcomes present challenges to capturing the effects of disturbance shocks. Two case studies will follow, examining the price responses of residential housing to wildfire and an invasive species, the hemlock woolly adelgid. The chapter will conclude with a discussion of management and policy implications of disturbance shocks to property markets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Acharya, G., and L. L. Bennett. 2001. Valuing open space and land-use patterns in urban watersheds. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22(2/3):221-237.
Anderson, L. M., and H. K. Cordell. 1985. Residential property values improved by landscaping with trees. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 9(3):162-166.
Anselin, L. 1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Bartik, T. J. 1988. Measuring the benefits of amenity improvements in hedonic price models. Land Economics 64(2):172-183.
Bell, K., and N. Bockstael. 2000. Applying the generalized-moments estimation approach to spatial problems involving microlevel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics 82:72-82.
Bernknopf, R. L., D. S. Brookshire, and M. A. Thayer. 1990. Earthquake and volcano hazard notices: An economic evaluation of changes in risk perceptions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18:35-49.
Beron, K. J., J. C. Murdoch, M. A. Thayer, and W. P. M. Vijverberg. 1997. An analysis of the housing market before and after the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Land Economics 73 (1):101-113.
Bin, O., and S. Polasky. 2004. Effects of flood hazards on property values: Evidence before and after Hurricane Floyd. Land Economics 80(4):490-500.
Brookshire, D. S., M. A. Thayer, J. Tshirhart, and W. Schulze. 1985. A test of the expected utility model: Evidence from earthquake risks. Journal of Political Economy 93(2):369-389.
Carroll, M. S., A. J. Findley, K. A. Blatner, S. R. Mendez, S. E. Daniels, and G. B. Walker. 2000. Social assessment for the Wenatchee National Forest wildfires of 1994: Targeted analysis for the Leavenworth, Entiat, and Chelan Ranger Districts. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-479. USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR.
Coarse-scale Spatial Data for Wildland Fire and Fuel Management [Online]. 1999. Prescribed fire and fire effects research work unit, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Available online at www.fs. fed. us/fire/fuelman.
Cropper, M. L., L. Deck, and K. E. McConnell. 1988. On the choice of functional form for hedonic price functions. Review of Economics and Statistics 70(4):668-675.
Deeming, J. E., R. E. Burgan, and J. D. Cohen. 1977. The national fire danger rating system. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-39. USDA Forest Service, Ogden, UT.
Deller, S. C., T-H Tsai, D. W. Marcouiller, and D. B. K. English. 2001. The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83:352-365.
Dombrow, J., M. Rodriguez, and C. F. Sirmans. 2000. The market value of mature trees in single-family housing markets. The Appraisal Journal 68(1):39-43.
Donovan, G. H., P. A. Champ, and D. T. Butry. 2007. The impact of wildfire risk on housing price: A case study from Colorado Springs. Land Economics 83(2):109-124.
English, D. B. K., D. W. Marcouiller, and H. K. Cordell. 2000. Tourism dependence in rural America: Estimates and effects. Society & Natural Resources 13:185-202.
Freeman, A. M. 1993. The measurement of environmental and resource values. Resources for the Future, Washington, D. C.
Garrod, G. D., and K. G. Willis. 1992a. The amenity value of woodland in Great Britain: A comparison of economic estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics 2 (4):415-434.
Garrod, G. D., and K. G. Willis. 1992b. The environmental impact of woodland: A two-stage hedonic price model of the amenity value of forestry in Britain. Applied Economics 24(7):715-728.
Geoghegan, J. 2002. The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy 19:91-98.
Geoghegan, J., L. A. Wainger, and N. E. Bockstael. 1997. Spatial landscape indicies in a hedonic framework: An ecological economic analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics 23 (3):251-264.
Holmes, T. P., E. A. Murphy, and K. P. Bell. 2006. Exotic forest insects and residential property values. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35:155-166.
Huggett Jr., R. J. 2003. Fire in the wildland-urban interface: An examination of the effects of wildfire on residential property markets. Ph. D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
IFCI [International Fire Code Institute]. 2000. Urban-wildland interface code. International Fire Code Institute, Whittier, CA.
Johnson, K. M., and C. L. Beale. 1994. The recent revival of widespread population growth in non-metropolitan areas of the United States. Rural Sociology 59:655-667.
Kask, S. B., and S. A. Maani. 1992. Uncertainty, information, and hedonic pricing. Land Economics 68(2):170-184.
Loomis, J. B. 2004. Do nearby forest fires cause a reduction in residential property values? Journal of Forest Economics 10(3):149-157.
Morales, D. J. 1980. The contribution of trees to residential property value. Journal of Arboriculture 6(11):305-308.
NFPA [National Fire Protection Association]. 2002. NFPA 1144 standard for protection of life and property from wildfire. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.
Payne, B. R. 1973. The twenty-nine tree home improvement plan. Natural History 82 (9):74-75.
Payne, B. R., and S. Strom. 1975. The contribution of trees to the appraised value of unimproved residential land. Valuation October/November:36-45.
Portney, P. R. 1981. Housing prices, health effects, and valuing reductions in risk of death. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8:72-78.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2001. Economic study of the Los Alamos post-fire residential real estate market. Prepared for the U. S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Office of Cerro Grande Fire Claims. Available online at http://www. fema. gov/news/ newsrelease. fema?id=10049.
Rapp, V. 2002. Fire risk in east-side forests. Science Update. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. September: pp. 1-12.
Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 82(1):34-55.
Royle, D. D., and R. G. Lathrop. 1997. Monitoring hemlock forest health in New Jersey using LANDSAT TM data and change detection. Forest Science 43(3):327-335.
Schultz, S. D., and D. A. King. 2001. The use of census data for hedonic price estimates of open-space amenities and land use. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22 (2/3):239-252.
Taylor, L. O. 2003. The hedonic method. In: A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, P. Champ, K. Boyle, and T. Brown (eds. ). Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 331-393.
Tryväinen, L. 1997. The amenity value of the urban forest: An application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning 37:211-222.
Tryväinen, L., and A. Miettinen. 2000. Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39(2):205-223.
Wells, A. R. 2001. Applications of the hedonic price method and geographic information systems in Northern Arizona. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huggett, R.J., Murphy, E.A., Holmes, T.P. (2008). Forest Disturbance Impacts on Residential Property Values. In: Holmes, T.P., Prestemon, J.P., Abt, K.L. (eds) The Economics of Forest Disturbances. Forestry Sciences, vol 79. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4370-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4370-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4369-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4370-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)