Skip to main content

Forest Disturbance Impacts on Residential Property Values

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 79))

Natural environments and the amenities they offer have fueled much of the population growth in the rural United States (Deller et al. 2001, English et al. 2000). In fact, the fastest growing counties in the United States during the early 1990s were non-metropolitan counties that were destinations for retirees or that offered outdoor recreation opportunities (Johnson and Beale 1994). Migration to these rural and exurban areas from urban and suburban locations, along with growth in the United States population, has resulted in an increased mixing of humans, their artifacts, and natural environments. These expanding interface and intermix areas expose more lives and property not only to desirable natural amenities, but also to natural disturbances and disamenities.

This chapter seeks to provide a basic framework for modeling the effects of forest and other natural disturbances on property markets. The modeling section will begin by introducing the hedonic property model in a simple, accessible format. Several important modeling issues and aspects of forest disturbances that make them special in regard to describing their impact on property markets will be discussed next. These include the tension between risks and amenities embodied in a forest resource, the temporal dynamics of disturbance manifestation, and spatial dependence among observed outcomes present challenges to capturing the effects of disturbance shocks. Two case studies will follow, examining the price responses of residential housing to wildfire and an invasive species, the hemlock woolly adelgid. The chapter will conclude with a discussion of management and policy implications of disturbance shocks to property markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acharya, G., and L. L. Bennett. 2001. Valuing open space and land-use patterns in urban watersheds. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22(2/3):221-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. M., and H. K. Cordell. 1985. Residential property values improved by landscaping with trees. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 9(3):162-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. 1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartik, T. J. 1988. Measuring the benefits of amenity improvements in hedonic price models. Land Economics 64(2):172-183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, K., and N. Bockstael. 2000. Applying the generalized-moments estimation approach to spatial problems involving microlevel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics 82:72-82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernknopf, R. L., D. S. Brookshire, and M. A. Thayer. 1990. Earthquake and volcano hazard notices: An economic evaluation of changes in risk perceptions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18:35-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beron, K. J., J. C. Murdoch, M. A. Thayer, and W. P. M. Vijverberg. 1997. An analysis of the housing market before and after the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Land Economics 73 (1):101-113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bin, O., and S. Polasky. 2004. Effects of flood hazards on property values: Evidence before and after Hurricane Floyd. Land Economics 80(4):490-500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, D. S., M. A. Thayer, J. Tshirhart, and W. Schulze. 1985. A test of the expected utility model: Evidence from earthquake risks. Journal of Political Economy 93(2):369-389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. S., A. J. Findley, K. A. Blatner, S. R. Mendez, S. E. Daniels, and G. B. Walker. 2000. Social assessment for the Wenatchee National Forest wildfires of 1994: Targeted analysis for the Leavenworth, Entiat, and Chelan Ranger Districts. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-479. USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coarse-scale Spatial Data for Wildland Fire and Fuel Management [Online]. 1999. Prescribed fire and fire effects research work unit, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Available online at www.fs. fed. us/fire/fuelman.

  • Cropper, M. L., L. Deck, and K. E. McConnell. 1988. On the choice of functional form for hedonic price functions. Review of Economics and Statistics 70(4):668-675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeming, J. E., R. E. Burgan, and J. D. Cohen. 1977. The national fire danger rating system. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-39. USDA Forest Service, Ogden, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deller, S. C., T-H Tsai, D. W. Marcouiller, and D. B. K. English. 2001. The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83:352-365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dombrow, J., M. Rodriguez, and C. F. Sirmans. 2000. The market value of mature trees in single-family housing markets. The Appraisal Journal 68(1):39-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, G. H., P. A. Champ, and D. T. Butry. 2007. The impact of wildfire risk on housing price: A case study from Colorado Springs. Land Economics 83(2):109-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, D. B. K., D. W. Marcouiller, and H. K. Cordell. 2000. Tourism dependence in rural America: Estimates and effects. Society & Natural Resources 13:185-202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. M. 1993. The measurement of environmental and resource values. Resources for the Future, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, G. D., and K. G. Willis. 1992a. The amenity value of woodland in Great Britain: A comparison of economic estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics 2 (4):415-434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, G. D., and K. G. Willis. 1992b. The environmental impact of woodland: A two-stage hedonic price model of the amenity value of forestry in Britain. Applied Economics 24(7):715-728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, J. 2002. The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy 19:91-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, J., L. A. Wainger, and N. E. Bockstael. 1997. Spatial landscape indicies in a hedonic framework: An ecological economic analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics 23 (3):251-264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T. P., E. A. Murphy, and K. P. Bell. 2006. Exotic forest insects and residential property values. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35:155-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggett Jr., R. J. 2003. Fire in the wildland-urban interface: An examination of the effects of wildfire on residential property markets. Ph. D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFCI [International Fire Code Institute]. 2000. Urban-wildland interface code. International Fire Code Institute, Whittier, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. M., and C. L. Beale. 1994. The recent revival of widespread population growth in non-metropolitan areas of the United States. Rural Sociology 59:655-667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kask, S. B., and S. A. Maani. 1992. Uncertainty, information, and hedonic pricing. Land Economics 68(2):170-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. B. 2004. Do nearby forest fires cause a reduction in residential property values? Journal of Forest Economics 10(3):149-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, D. J. 1980. The contribution of trees to residential property value. Journal of Arboriculture 6(11):305-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • NFPA [National Fire Protection Association]. 2002. NFPA 1144 standard for protection of life and property from wildfire. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, B. R. 1973. The twenty-nine tree home improvement plan. Natural History 82 (9):74-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, B. R., and S. Strom. 1975. The contribution of trees to the appraised value of unimproved residential land. Valuation October/November:36-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portney, P. R. 1981. Housing prices, health effects, and valuing reductions in risk of death. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8:72-78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2001. Economic study of the Los Alamos post-fire residential real estate market. Prepared for the U. S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Office of Cerro Grande Fire Claims. Available online at http://www. fema. gov/news/ newsrelease. fema?id=10049.

  • Rapp, V. 2002. Fire risk in east-side forests. Science Update. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. September: pp. 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 82(1):34-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royle, D. D., and R. G. Lathrop. 1997. Monitoring hemlock forest health in New Jersey using LANDSAT TM data and change detection. Forest Science 43(3):327-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, S. D., and D. A. King. 2001. The use of census data for hedonic price estimates of open-space amenities and land use. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22 (2/3):239-252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. O. 2003. The hedonic method. In: A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, P. Champ, K. Boyle, and T. Brown (eds. ). Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 331-393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryväinen, L. 1997. The amenity value of the urban forest: An application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning 37:211-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryväinen, L., and A. Miettinen. 2000. Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39(2):205-223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. R. 2001. Applications of the hedonic price method and geographic information systems in Northern Arizona. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huggett, R.J., Murphy, E.A., Holmes, T.P. (2008). Forest Disturbance Impacts on Residential Property Values. In: Holmes, T.P., Prestemon, J.P., Abt, K.L. (eds) The Economics of Forest Disturbances. Forestry Sciences, vol 79. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4370-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics