According to the classical point of view, nature would be an automaton. However, today we discover everywhere instabilities, bifurcations, evolution. This demands a different formulation of the laws of nature to include probability and time symmetry breaking. We have shown that the difficulties in the classical formulation come from too narrow a point of view concerning the fundamental laws of dynamics (classical or quantum). The classical model has been a model of integrable systems (in the sense of Poincare). It is this model, which leads to determinism and time reversibility. We have shown that when we leave this model and consider a class of non-integrable systems, the difficulties are overcome. We show that our approach unifies dynamics, thermodynamics and probability theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
I. Prigogine Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics, Wiley, New York (1962).
I. Prigogine From Being to Becoming, Freeman, New York (1980).
T. Petrosky, I. Prigogine and S. Tasaki, “Quantum theory of nonintegrable systems”, Physica A 173, 175–242 (1991).
I. Antoniou and S. Tasaki, “Generalized spectral decomposition of mixing dynamical systems”, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 46, 425–474 (1993).
I. Antoniou and I. Prigogine, “Intrinsic irreversibility and integrability of dynamics”, Physica A 192, 443–464 (1993).
T. Petrosky and I. Prigogine, “Poincare resonances and the extension of classical dynamics”, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 7, 441–497 (1996).
T. Petrosky and I. Prigogine, “The Liouville space extension of quantum mechanics”, Adv. Chem. Phys. 99, 1–120, ed. I. Prigogine and S. Rice, Wiley (1997).
G. Ordonez, T. Petrosky and I. Prigogine, “Space-time formulation of quantum transitions”, Phys. Rev. A 63, 052106 (2001).
T. Petrosky, G. Ordonez and I. Prigogine, “Space-time formulation of quantum transitions”, Phys. Rev. A 64, 062101 (2001).
E. Karpov, G. Ordonez, T. Petrosky and I. Prigogine, “Quantum transitions in interacting fields”, Phys. Rev. A 66, 012109 (2002).
I. Prigogine, S. Kim, G. Ordonez and T. Petrosky, Stochasticity and time symmetry breaking in Hamiltonian dynamics, submitted to Proc. Solvay conference in Delphi, Greece (2001).
G. Ordonez, T. Petrosky and I. Prigogine, Microscopic entropy flow and entropy production in resonance scattering, submitted to Proc. Solvay conference in Delphi, Greece (2001).
E. Karpov, G. Ordonez, T. Petrosky and I. Prigogine, Microscopic Entropy and Nonlocality, Proc. Workshop on Quantum Physics and Communication (QPC 2002) Dubna, Russia (2002), Particles and Nuclei, Letters. No. 1 [116], 8–15 (2003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prigogine, I. (2008). Is the Future Given? Changes in Our Description of Nature. In: Sidharth, B.G. (eds) A Century of Ideas. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 149. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4360-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4360-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4359-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4360-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)