Skip to main content

DOES RHETORIC ALWAYS MATCH REALITY? AN OVERVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL DECENTRALIZATION IN KERALA, INDIA

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Decentralization
  • 1043 Accesses

Abstract

Kerala State, which lies on the most southwestern tip of India, is widely known for its innovative approaches to social development and education, and is regarded internationally as a model for development. This tiny state with a most advanced civil society has been described as “a sort of Scandinavia of the ThirdWorld” (Tornquist, 2000, p. 118). The state has achieved universal primary education, near-universal literacy, and near gender equality in access to education.Kerala has received recognition for its history of social mobilization of education, health care, public distribution of food both at home and abroad, and for the many fundamental structural changes it has adopted, including land reforms. Yet paradoxically, Kerala has also been referred to as “a mystery inside a riddle inside an enigma” (Wallich, 1995, p. 37) because it has never succeeded in translating its human development indicators into economic ones (Mukundan & Bray, 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Archer, M. S. (1984). Social origins of educational systems. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balan, T. K. (2002). Sen Committee Reportum Adhikara Vikenthreekaranavum [The Sen Committee Report and decentralization of power]. In M. A. Baby (ed.), Marxist Samvadam [Democratic decentralization: The experience of a decade, EMS Seminar special issue] (pp. 73–79). Thiruvananthapuram: AKG Center for Research and Studies (in Malayalam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Basheer, A. (2004). Decentralization and development in the North Malabar region during the eighth and ninth Plan, PhD Thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M., & Mukundan, M. V. (2003). Management and governance for EFA: Is decentralization really the answer? EFA Thematic Paper, EFA Global Monitoring Report 2003–04, UNESCO, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Panchayat. (2002). Department of Panchyat. Internet Document: http://www.kerala.gov.in/government/govdepartments.htm.

  • Dillinger, W. (1995). Better urban services: Finding the right incentives. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, C. G. (1996). Political myth: A theoretical introduction. New York: Garland Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, R. W. (2002). Democratic decentralization: The Kerala experience in international perspective. In M. A. Baby (ed.), Marxist Samvadam [Democratic decentralization: The experience of a decade, EMS Seminar special issue] (pp. 47–58). Thiruvananthapuram: AKG Center for Research and Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Kerala. (2002a). Guidelines for the preparation of tenth five year plan by local governments. Thiruvananthapuram: KSAVRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Kerala. (2002b) Action plan for strengthening local governments: Draft for discussion in the modernising government programme. Thiruvananthapuram: Government of Kerala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Kerala. (2002c). Policy on capacity building of local governments in financial management: Draft for discussion in the modernising government programme. Thiruvananthapuram: Government of Kerala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, E. M. (2000). Editorial. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(5), 406–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). (1997). Economic and social progress in Latin America: 1997 Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnakumar, R. (2003). Derailing decentralization. Frontline, 20(16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malayala Manorama Daily. (2002, 3 June). Editorial News provided on the online edition in Malayalam language (http://www.manorama.com).

  • Malayala Manorama Daily. (2005, 4 February). Editorial News titled Adanja Manasum Thuranna Lokavum [Closed Mind and Open World] (in Malayalam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathrubhumi Daily. (2001, 29 November). News item provided in Malayalam language on the online Internet edition, Kreala Varthakal [Kerala News] (www.mathrubhumi.com).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathrubhumi Daily. (2002a, 14 October). Purusha Pankalitham kuravu; Gramasabhakal vazhipadakunnu [Male participation rate low; Ward councils becoming ritualistic], news item provided in Malayalam language in the Kannur Edition, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathrubhumi Daily. (2002b, 11 November). Vikendreekrithasoothranam: Schoolukalil adhyapanam mudangunnu [Decentralized planning: Teaching process gets interrupted in schools], news item provided in Malayalam language in the Kannur Edition, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathrubhumi Daily. (2002c, 13 November). Janakeeyaasoothranam: Nagarasabhakalil lakshangalude kramakkedu [Peoples’ planning: Financial disorders in millions in the municipalities], news item provided in Malayalam language in the Kannur Edition, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathrubhumi Daily. (2003, 10 January). Nattu Varthakal: Kannur, Kasaragod [Local News: Kannur and Kasaragod], news item provided in Malayalam language on the online Internet edition (http://www.mathrubhumi.com).

  • Mathrubhumi Daily. (2005a, 30 January). Editorial report titled “Thaddesha Padhathikalile Azhimathi Thadayanam” [Take Measures to Stop Corruptions in Local Projects].

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathrubhumi Daily. (2005b, 2 February). Report on p. 2 (Col. 3, 4, & 5), Kannur Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miksell, J. L. (1991). Fiscal administration: Analysis and application for the public sector. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, V. N. (2001). Democratic decentralization and associative patterns: Women’s participation in Kerala. Thiruvananthapuram: Centre for Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukundan, M. V. (2001). Community participation in education: An overview of Kerala, India. Comparative Education Bulletin, 5, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukundan, M. V. (2003a). Democratic decentralization and primary education: A comparison of continuity and change in two districts of Kerala (India). Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukundan, M. V. (2003b). The control of education: A multilevel analysis of continuity and change in two districts of Kerala, India, PhD Thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukundan, M. V. (2004). Education and decentralization: A case study of India’s Kerala state. Shenyang, China: Liaoning People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukundan, M. V. (2005). Decentralization in education: Practices and paradoxes. Perspectives in Education, 21(1), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukundan, M. V., & Bray, M. (2004). The decentralization of education in Kerala State, India: Rhetoric and reality. International Review of Education, 50(3–4), 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, A. S. K., & George, R. (2002). Unfinished tasks in the people’s plan campaign: Drinking water and watershed based development. In M. A. Baby (ed.), Marxist Samvadam [Democratic decentralization: The experience of a decade, EMS Seminar special issue] (pp. 316–323). Thiruvananthapuram: AKG Center for Research and Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, M. G. S. (1997). The concept of decentralization: Expectations, limitations and possibilities. In N. P. Chekutty (Ed.), The people’s plan: A debate on Kerala’s decentralized planning experiment. Kozhikode, India: Calicut Press Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazeer, M. (1997a, 7 November). Plan campaign: Good start in Kannur. Report published in The Hindu daily newspaper, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazeer, M. (1997b, 10 November). Plan campaign shows tardy progress. Report published in The Hindu daily newspaper, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neelakantan, C. R. (2004, 31 October–6 November). Janakeeyasoothranam Nilanilkumo? [Will People’s Planning Sustain?]. Mathrubhumi Weekly, 35(85), 25–29 (in Malayalam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powis, B. (1999). Bottom-up approaches to decentralization: The people’s campaign in Kerala. Unpublished Dissertation for Masters Programme in Rural Development, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Kozhikode: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan, K. (1997, 24 October). Some planning, some politics, article published in The Hindu daily newspaper, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V., & Vijayanand, S. M. (2002). Towards time bound Panchayati Raj. Paper presented at the Media Seminar Conducted at Kerala Institute for Local Administration (KILA), Mulamkunnathukavu, Thrissur, Kerala, November 8–9, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravi, K. (2002, October 2002). New development paradigm for Kerala: Kudumbasangamam. Kerala Calling, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Planning Board. (1998). Asoothranasahayi: Vidhyabhyasa Meghala [Handbook for planning: Education sector]. Thiruvananthapuram: State Planning Board and General Education Department, Government of Kerala (in Malayalam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhritkumar, A. (2002). Kerala Panchayat Raj Niyamam: Oru tharathamyavalokanam [The Kerala Panchayati Raj Act: A comparative analysis]. In M. A. Baby (ed.), Marxist Samvadam [Democratic decentralization: The experience of a decade, EMS Seminar special issue] (pp. 91–96). Thiruvananthapuram: AKG Center for Research and Studies (in Malayalam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, I. T. M., & Franke, R. W. (2000). Local democracy and development: People’s campaign for decentralized planning in Kerala. New Delhi: Leftword.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, I. T. M., & Harilal, K. N. (1997, 4 January). Planning for empowerment: People’s campaign for decentralized planning in Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly, XXXII (1, 2), 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, I. T. M., & Heller, P. (2001). The campaign for democratic decentralization in Kerala, India. Internet Document: http://www.ssc.wise.edn/~wright/Deep_OnlinePDF_OnlinePDF.pdf.

  • Tornquist, O. (2000). The new popular development of politics: Kerala’s experience. In G. Parayil (Ed.), Kerala: The development experience—Reflections on sustainability and replicability (pp. 116–138). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venu, K. (2003, 20 July). Poru Fudal Kammunisavum Muthalalitha Kammunisavum Thammil [Struggle in between feudal communism and capitalist communism], article published in the Mathrubhumi Daily Newspaper Sunday Supplement, p. iii (in Malayalam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Venugopal, P. (1997, 3 October). Differing views about a plan campaign. Report published in The Hindu, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayanand, S. M. (2001). Issues related to administrative decentralization and administering of decentralization: Lesson from the Kerala experience. Paper presented at the Workshop on Decentralization organized by the Institute for Social and Economic Change at Bangalore, India, May 31–June 1, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallich, P. (1995). A mystery inside a riddle inside an enigma. Scientific American, 272(3), 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S. C. (1996). Depoliticising development: The use and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6(1), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mukundan, M. (2006). DOES RHETORIC ALWAYS MATCH REALITY? AN OVERVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL DECENTRALIZATION IN KERALA, INDIA. In: BJORK, C. (eds) Educational Decentralization. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4358-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics