Skip to main content

Reflections on the Challenges of Eu Policy-Making with View to Flood Risk Management

Actors, processes and the acquis communautaire

  • Chapter
Flood Risk Management in Europe

Abstract

Europe has a long history of devastation caused by floods. Each flood event triggers dynamic spatial and temporal mechanisms, which include the mobilisation of many multi-disciplinary actors, setting up and/or revision of many administrative and operational processes, and entry into force and/or update of legal frameworks. Depending on geographical extent of the flooding coupled with national modus operandi of countries, the above-mentioned mechanisms may take place at local, regional and national levels. However, as floods can also be a transboundary phenomenon, and as events in one country are no longer isolated but are strictly related to progress towards increased social cohesion and competitiveness within the European Union (EU), European initiatives dealing with floods and other major hazards have gained momentum and are considered a strategic objective in the EU. This is evidenced by the establishment of the EU Solidarity Fund1 that was set up in the aftermath of the Central European flooding in August 2002 “providing financial assistance to contribute to a rapid return to normal living conditions in the disaster-stricken regions”. The decision-making process prescribed in the Treaty establishing the European Community2 (TEC) would govern the legal basis for any potential flood risk management initiative at EU level and would mainly be based on Article 174, comma 23 of the TEC This paper introduces the reader to the EU decision-making mechanism by briefly describing the actors of the EU inter-institutional decision-making process with view to flood risk management. It also gives an overview of the existing European Commission (CEC)4 efforts in the field and portrays the challenges the EU has to face given the state-of-the-art of flood risk management at EU level. Finally, a glimpse of a strategy to provide added-value through EU policy endeavours to complement national initiatives are proposed

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Borchardt K-D (2000) The ABC of community law, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000 ISBN 92-828-7803-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo AG, Hervas J, Vetere Arellano AL (2002) Guidelines on flash flood prevention and mitigation. EUR Report 20386 EN, European Commission, DG Joint Research, Ispra, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo AG, Vetere Arellano AL (eds) (2002a) Proceedings: learning our lessons – dissemination of information on lessons learnt from disasters, EUR Report 20537 EN, European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo AG, Vetere Arellano AL (eds) (2002b) Lessons learnt from flood disasters. EUR Report 20261 EN, European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • De Roo APJ, Wesseling CG, Van Deursen WPA (2000) Physically-based river basin modelling within a GIS: The LISFLOOD model. Hydrological Processes 14: 1981–1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Roo Ad, Schmuck G (2002) ODER-LISFLOOD: Assessment of the effects of engineering, land-use and climate scenarios on flood risk in the Oder catchment. Report of the European Commission, Joint Research Centre, EUR 20276 EN.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Roo Ad, Schmuck G, Perdigao V, Thielen J (2003a) The influence of historic land use changes and future planned land use scenarios on floods in oder catchment, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B, 1291–1300

    Google Scholar 

  • De Roo A, Gouweleeuw B, Thielen J, Bates P, Hollingsworth A et al. (2003b) Development of a European flood forecasting system. International Journal of River Basin Management No. 1, 1: 49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency UK (2001) Lessons learned: Autumn 2000 floods. ISBN 1870555063

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency (2001) Sustainable water use in Europe, Part 3: extreme hydrological events: floods and droughts. Environment issue report number 21, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1998) Communication from the commission to the European council – partnership for integration – a strategy for Integrating Environment into EU Policies, COM(98)333, submitted to Cardiff – June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1999) ESDP: European spatial development perspective towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European union, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1999, ISBN 92-828-7658-6

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000a) Communication from the commission to the council and European parliament on the precautionary principle, COM (2000)1 of 2 February 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000b) The lisbon European council. An agenda of economic and social renewal for Europe, Doc 007, Brussels, 25 February 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001) Communication from the commission to the council and European parliament on a sustainable Europe for a better world: a European union strategy for sustainable development, COM(2001)264 of 15 May 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002) Communication from the commission to the European parliament and the council, The European Community response to the flooding in Austria, Germany and several applicant countries – A solidarity-based initiative, COM(2002) 481 of 28 August 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003a) Choosing to grow: knowledge, innovation and jobs in a cohesive society, Report to the Spring European Council, 21 March 2003 on the Lisbon strategy of economic, social and environmental renewal, COM(2003) 5 of 21 March 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003b) Communication from the commission to the council, European parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Updating and simplifying the Community acquis, COM(2003) 71 of 11 February 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004) Communication from the commission to the council, European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Flood risk management: Flood prevention, protection and mitigation, COM(2004)472 final of 12 July 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2002) Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels PG (2003) Flood risk and flood forecasting – the state-of-the-art in EU research.In: Proceedings of the EU-MEDIN forum on disaster research entitled The Road to Harmonisation, Thessaloniki on 26–27 May 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Economic Commission for Europe [UN-ECE] (2000) Sustainable flood prevention, Submitted by the Chairman of the task force on flood prevention and protection, led by Germany, and prepared with the assistance of the secretariat, to the Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on the Protection and use of transboundary water courses and international lakes, The Hague, Netherlands, 23–25 March 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetere Arellano AL, Nordvik J-P, Ranguelov B (2003) In: Van der Veen A, Vetere Arellano AL, Nordvik J-P (eds) NEDIES Project Proceedings: In search of a common methodology on damage estimation, EUR Report 20997 EN, European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetere Arellano AL, Cruz AM, Steinberg L, Nordvik J-P, Pisano F (eds) (2004) NEDIES Project Proceedings: Analysis of NATECH (Natural Hazard Triggering Technological Disasters) disaster management, EUR Report 21054 EN, European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood M, Vetere Arellano AL, Mushtaq F (2003) Management of natural and technological hazards in central and eastern european candidate countries, EUR Report 20834 EN, European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arellano, A.V., Roo, A.D., Nordvik, JP. (2007). Reflections on the Challenges of Eu Policy-Making with View to Flood Risk Management. In: Begum, S., Stive, M.J.F., Hall, J.W. (eds) Flood Risk Management in Europe. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4200-3_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics