Skip to main content

Decision-Making for Flood-Threatened Properties

  • Chapter
Flood Risk Management in Europe

Part of the book series: Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research ((NTHR,volume 25))

Abstract

When a flood threatens an existing property such as a dwelling or business, the owner must decide what action to take to minimise the dangers, damage, and inconvenience. Extensive material is available related to options for managing the flood vulnerability of individual properties before, during, and after floods. These sources offer comprehensive information on the possibilities which exist but rarely develop tools for determining which option might be the most appropriate in given circumstances

This chapter discusses the need for, and provides some simple tools for, understanding decision-making for flood-threatened properties. The focus is on individual properties which might be threatened by floodwater, imminently (existing properties) or in the future (existing or planned properties). The decisions addressed are: • Emphasising dry or wet flood resistance: to seal or not to seal an individual property? • Reducing recovery duration: should property components be removed from the property before the flood, replaced after the flood, or dried and cleaned after the flood? • Implementing resilient reinstatement: resilient reinstatement should be a social, not property-orientated, solution. Then, the implications for the wider community context are elaborated The U.K. is used as the main case study. The discussion helps to consolidate available information in order to produce useful analytical approaches which any property owner could use. The key is to make each property owner their own expert rather than forcing them to rely on experts

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ABI (1999) Memorandum by the association of British insurers on the Environment Agency (EA 55) to the select committee on environment, transport and regional affairs. http://www.parliament.the-stationery-ffice.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmenvtra/829/829m46.htm. Cited 9 August 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • BB&V (2001) Sussex Ouse: 12th October 2000 flood report, Executive summary, BB&V (Binnie Black & Veatch) for the EA (Environment Agency), England and Wales

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley M, Bowker P (2002) Improving local flood protection to property. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 150(special issue 1):49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRE (1997) Repairing flood damage, Good repair guide 11: Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4, BRE (Building Research Establishment Ltd.), document number CI/SfB (H16) (W7)

    Google Scholar 

  • BRESL (1996) Design guidance on flood damage to dwellings, report prepared for The Scottish Office Construction and Building Control Group by BRESL (the Building Research Establishment Scottish Laboratory). The Scottish Office, Development Department, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • CIRIA (2004) Information from CIRIA (Construction Industry Research and Information Association). http://www.ciria.org.uk/flooding. Cited 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Crichton D (2001) The implications of climate change for the insurance industry. Building Research Establishment, Watford, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Crichton D (2003a) Flood risk and insurance in England and Wales: are there lessons to be learnt from Scotland? Benfield Hazard Research Centre Technical Paper Number 1. http://www.benfieldhrc.org/SiteRoot/activities/publications.htm. Cited 7 February 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Crichton D (2003b) Temporary local flood protection in the United Kingdom – An independent assessment. Benfield Hazard Research Centre Miscellaneous Paper. http://www.benfieldhrc.org/SiteRoot/activities/publications.htm. Cited 7 February 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • DTLR (2002) Preparing for floods. DTLR (Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions). http://www.safety.dtlr.gov.uk/bregs/floods/index.htm. Cited 27 February 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • EA (2001) Lessons learned: autumn 2000 floods EA (Environment Agency), Report, England and Wales

    Google Scholar 

  • EA (2004) Information from the EA (Environment Agency). http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk. Cited 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • EA/CIRIA (2001a) After a flood: how to restore your home. EA (Environment Agency) and CIRIA (Construction Industry Research and Information Association), Booklet 0901/BGIV

    Google Scholar 

  • EA/CIRIA (2001b) Damage limitation: how to make your home flood resistant. EA (Environment Agency) and CIRIA (Construction Industry Research and Information Association), Booklet 1201/BGIU

    Google Scholar 

  • Etkin D (1999) Risk transference and related trends: driving forces towards more mega-disasters. Environ Hazards 1:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Experian Limited (2000) Great Britain MOSAIC, descriptions along with separate data tables for flood damage. Experian, Nottingham, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Floodforum.net (2002) A web-based online debate commissioned by the U.K.’s Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. http://www.floodforum.net (no longer available). Cited 21 January to 17 February 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert G, Deutsch J-C, Desbordes M (c. 1996) Policy decision support systems: modelling of rainfall flood damages, chapter 3. In: Penning-Rowsell E (ed) Improving flood hazard management across Europe, European union environment programme. Contract Number EV5V-CT93-0296, EUROFlood II

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam KMN (1997) The impacts of flooding and methods of assessment in urban areas of Bangladesh, Ph.D. thesis, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato F, Torii K-i (2002) Damages to general properties due to a storm surge in Japan. In: Proceedings of the solutions to coastal disasters conference, American Society for Civil Engineers (ASCE), San Diego, California, 24–27 February 2002, pp159–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman I (2001) The autumn 2000 floods in England and flood management. Weather 56(10):346–348, 353–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman I, Spence R (2003a) A flood failure flowchart for buildings. Proc Inst Civ Eng—Munic 156(ME3):207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman I, Spence R (2003b) A limit analysis of unreinforced masonry failing under floodwater pressures. Masonry International 16(2):51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman I, Spence R (2004) An overview of flood actions on buildings. Eng Geol 73(3–4):297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J (1979) Vulnerability to a natural hazard: geomorphic, technological and social change at Chiswell. Dorset, Working Paper 37, Natural Hazards Working Papers. University of Colorado, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J (1999) Development in disaster-prone places: studies of vulnerability. Intermediate Technology Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J (2004) Information from datum international. http://www.livingwithflooding.co.uk. Cited 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • NFF (2004) Information from NFF (National Flood Forum). http://www.floodforum.org.uk. Cited 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • N’Jai A, Tapsell SM, Taylor D, Thompson PM, Witts RC (1990) FLAIR 1990 (Flood Loss Assessment Information Report). Middlesex Polytechnic Flood Hazard Research Centre, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Orme M, Liddament MW, Wilson A (1998) Numerical data for air infiltration and natural ventilation calculations, Document AIC-TN-44-1994, Technical Note AIVC 44, AIVC (Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre) Coventry, Oscar Faber Group Ltd on behalf of the International Energy Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell EC, Chatterton JB (1977) The benefits of flood alleviation: a manual of assessment techniques. Gower, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell EC, Green CH, Thompson PM, Coker AM, Tunstall SM, Richards C, Parker DJ (1992) The economics of coastal management: a manual of benefit assessment techniques. Belhaven Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • SEPA (2004) Information from SEPA (Scottish Environment Protection Agency). http://www.sepa.org.uk. Cited 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Torterotot JP, Kauark-Leite LA, Roche P-A (1992) Analysis of individual real-time responses to flooding and influence on damage to households. In: Saul AJ (ed) Floods and flood management. Papers presented at the 3rd international conference on floods and flood management, 24–26 November 1992 in Florence, Italy, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht and London, 363–387

    Google Scholar 

  • USACE (1996) Risk-based analysis for flood damage reduction studies, Manual No. 1110-2-1619, USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers) Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kelman, I. (2007). Decision-Making for Flood-Threatened Properties. In: Begum, S., Stive, M.J.F., Hall, J.W. (eds) Flood Risk Management in Europe. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4200-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics