- 191 Downloads
In everyday life, in science and in philosophy, we often express judgments of relevance: fact a is relevant to fact b,theory c is relevant to action d,statement e is irrelevant to belief f, etc. And we often have a great measure of confidence in such judgments, since we are ready to base important decisions upon them (e.g., in the courtroom, when an objection concerning the irrelevance of a question is either sustained or rejected by the judge) and, when necessary, we are willing to engage in serious disputes about the truth of such judgments (e.g., a doctoral committee discussing about the relevance of the second chapter of a dissertation).
KeywordsSemantic Relation Illocutionary Force Deductive Argument Semantic Relevance Local Purpose
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Berlin, I., 1938–39, “Verification,” in: The Theory of Meaning,G.H.R. Parkinson (ed.), Oxford, University Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, L.J., 1971, “Speech Acts,” in: Current Trends in Linguistics 12, T.A. Sebeok (ed.) The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
- Dascal, M., 1971, “Empirical Significance and Relevance,” Philosophia 1: 81–106. Dascal, M., 1975, “La Razon y los misterios de la fe segun Leibniz,” Revista Latinoaamericana de Filosofia 1: 193–226.Google Scholar
- Goodman, N., 1972, “About,” in: Problems and Projects, Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merril. Grice, H.P., 1968, “Logic and Conversation” (Unpublished lecture notes from William James Lectures at Harvard, 1967 ).Google Scholar
- Grice, H.P., 1975, “Logic and Conversation,” in: Syntax and Semantics 3, P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.), New York, Academic Press (corresponds to the second lecture in Grice, 1968 ).Google Scholar
- Gunter, R., 1974, Sentences in Dialog, Columbia (South Carolina), Hornbeam Press. Hare, R.M., 1970, “Meaning and Speech Acts,” in: Practical Inferences, London, Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
- Quine, W.v.O., 1969, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar