Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Einstein and Mach's Principle

  • Chapter
Book cover The Genesis of General Relativity

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 250))

  • 3619 Accesses

Einstein's attempt to realize Machian ideas in the construction of general relativity was undoubtedly a very major stimulus to the creation of that theory. Indeed, the very name of the theory derives from Einstein's conviction that a theory which does justice to Mach's critique of Newton's notion of absolute space must be generally relativis-tic, or covariant with respect to the most extensive possible transformations of the spacetime coordinates.

The extent to which general relativity is actually Machian is, however, the subject of great controversy. During the last six months, I have been examining closely all of Einstein's papers that concern the special and general theory of relativity together with a substantial proportion of his correspondence related to relativity. There were several things that I wished to establish: 1) What precisely was the defect (or defects) in the Newtonian scheme that Einstein sought to rectify in his general theory of relativity? 2) How did Einstein propose to rectify the perceived defect(s)? 3) What relation does Einstein's work on his Machian ideas bear to the other ideas and work of his predecessors and contemporaries on the problem of absolute and relative motion? 4) Finally, to what extent did general relativity solve that great and ancient problem of the connection between and status of absolute and relative motion?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 749.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Edward and Julian B. Barbour. 2002. “Interacting Vector Fields in Relativity without Relativity.” Classical and Quantum Gravity 19: 3249–3261 (gr-qc 0201092).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Edward, Julian B. Barbour, Brendan Z. Foster, and Niall Ó Murchadha. 2003. “Scale-Invariant Gravity: Geometrodynamics.” Classical and Quantum Gravity 20: 3217–3248 (gr-qc 0211022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, Julian B. 1989. Absolute or Relative Motion, Vol. 1. The Discovery of Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted 2001 as the paperback The Discovery of Dynamics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1994. “The Timelessness of Quantum Gravity. I. The Evidence from the Classical Theory. II. The Appearance of Dynamics in Static Configurations.” Classical and Quantum Gravity 11: 2853–2897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1995. “General relativity as a Perfectly Machian Theory.” In (Barbour and Pfister 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1997. “Nows Are All We Need.” In H. Atmanspacher and E. Ruhnau (eds.), Time, Temporality, Now. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1999a. The End of Time. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson: New York: Oxford University Press (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1999b. “The Development of Machian Themes in the Twentieth Century.” In J. Butterfield (ed.), The Arguments of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2001. “On General Covariance and Best Matching.” In C. Callender and N. Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2003a. “Scale-Invariant Gravity: Particle Dynamics.” Classical and Quantum Gravity 20: 1543–1570 (gr-qc 0211021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2003b. “Dynamics of Pure Shape, Relativity and the Problem of Time.” In H.-T. Elze (ed.), Deco-herence and Entropy in Complex Systems. Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 663. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (gr-qc 0308089).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (in preparation). Absolute or Relative Motion? Vol. 2: The Frame of the World. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, Julian B. and Bruno Bertotti. 1977. “Gravity and Inertia in A Machian Framework.” Nuovo Cimento 38B: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1982. “Mach's Principle and the Structure of Dynamical Theories.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 382: 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, Julian B., Brendan Z. Foster and Niall Ó Murchadha. 2002. “Relativity without Relativity.” Classical and Quantum Gravity 19: 3217–3248 (gr-qc 0012089).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, Julian B. and Herbert Pfister (eds.). 1995. Mach's Principle: From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity. Einstein Studies, Vol. 6. Boston: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemence, G.M. 1957. “Astronomical Time.” Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CPAE 1: John Stachel, David C. Cassidy, Robert Schulmann, and Jürgen Renn (eds.), The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 1. The Early Years, 1879–1902. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPAE 2. 1989. John Stachel, David C. Cassidy, Jürgen Renn, and Robert Schulmann (eds.), The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 2. The Swiss Years: Writings, 1900–1909. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPAE 4. 1995. Martin J. Klein, A. J. Kox, Jürgen Renn, and Robert Schulmann (eds.), The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 4. The Swiss Years: Writings, 1912–1914. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPAE 5E: The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 5. The Swiss Years: Correspondence, 1902–1914. English edition translated by Anna Beck, consultant Don Howard. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPAE 6. 1996. A. J. Kox, Martin J. Klein, and Robert Schulmann (eds.), The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 6. The Berlin Years: Writings, 1914–1917. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPAE 7. 2002. Michel Janssen, Robert Schulmann, József Illy, Christoph Lehner, and Diana Kormos Buchwald (eds.), The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 7. The Berlin Years: Writings, 1918–1921. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziobek, Otto. 1888. Die mathematischen Theorien der Planeten-Bewegungen. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1892. Mathematical Theories of Planetary Motions. Register Publishing Company. Reprinted by Dover in 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, Albert. 1905. “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper.” Annalen der Physik 17, 891–921, (CPAE 2, Doc. 23). English translation in (Lorentz et al. 1923).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1907. “Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen.” V. §17. Jahr-buch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik 4: 411–462, (CPAE 2, Doc. 47).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1912. “Gibt es eine Gravitationswirkung, die der elektrodynamischen Induktionswirkung analog ist?” Vierteljahrschrift für gerichtliche Medizin und öffentliches Sanitätswesen 44: 37–40, (CPAE 4, Doc. 7).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1913a. “Zum gegenwärtigen Stande des Gravitationsproblems.” Physikalische Zeitschrift 14: 1249–1266, (CPAE 4, Doc. 17). (English translation in this volume.)

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1913b. “Physikalische Grundlagen einer Gravitationstheorie.” Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturfor-schenden Gesellschaft Zürich 58: 284–290, (CPAE 4, Doc. 16).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1914. “Die formale Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie.” Sitzungsberichte der Preussi-schen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1030–1085, Part 2, (CPAE 6, Doc. 9).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1917. “Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie.” Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: 142–145, (CPAE 6, Doc. 43).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1918a. “Prinzipielles zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie.” Annalen der Physik 55: 241–244, (CPAE 7, Doc. 4).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1918b. “Dialog über Einwände gegen die Relativitätstheorie.” Die Naturwissenschaften 6: No. 48, 697–702, (CPAE 7, Doc. 13).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1919. “What is the Theory of Relativity?” The Times, 29 November 1919. Republished in (Einstein 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1921. “Geometrie und Erfahrung.” Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaf-ten Vol. 1, 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1923. “Grundgedanken und Probleme der Relativitätstheorie.” In Nobelstiftelsen, Les Prix Nobel en 1921–1922. Stockholm: Imprimerie Royale.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1926. “Nichteuklidsche Geometrie in der Physik.” Neue Rundschau, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1933. “Notes on the Origin of the General Theory of Relativity.” In Albert Einstein. Ideas and Opinions, 285–290. Translated by Sonja Bargmann. New York: Crown, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1949. “Autobiographical Notes.” In P.A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist. Evanston, Illinois: The Library of Living Philosophers, Inc., Illinois, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1954. Ideas and Opinions. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gustav. 1891. “Über das Trägheitsgesetz.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 98, 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlaender, Benedict and Immanuel Friedlaender. 1896. Absolute oder relative Bewegung? Berlin: Leon-hard Simion. (English translation in this volume.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Alfred R. and Marie B. Hall. 1962. Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, Hermann L. F. 1968. “Über die Tatsachen, die der Geometrie zum Grunde liegen.” Nachrichte von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, No. 9, June 3rd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W. 1904. Kritische Beleuchtung der beiden Grundbegriffe der Mechanik: Bewegung und Träg-heit und daraus gezogene Folgerungen betreffs der Achsendrehung der Erde und des Foucault'schen Pendelversuchs. Wien und Leipzig: M. Kuppitsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmann, Erich. 1917. “Über den physikalischen Sinn der Relativitätspostulate, A. Einsteins neue und seine ursprüngliche Relativitätstheorie.” Annalen der Physik 53: 575–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagrange, Joseph-Louis. 1772. “Essai sur le problème des trois corps.” Republished in: Oeuvres de Lagrange, Vol. 6, Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 229 (1873).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, Ludwig. 1884. “Über die wissenschaftliche Fassung des Galilei'schen Beharrungsgesetz.” Philoso-phische Studien 2: 266–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1885. “Über das Beharrungsgesetz.” Berichte der Königlichen Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wis-senschaften, Math.-Physik. Klasse 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1886. Die geschichtliche Entwicklung des Bewegungsbegriffs und ihr voraussichtliches Endergeb-nis. Ein Beitrag zur historischen Kritik der mechanischen Prinzipien. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laue, Max von. 1948. “Dr. Ludwig Lange. 1863–1936. (Ein zu unrecht Vergessener.)” Die Naturwissen-schaften 35, 193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1955. Die Relativitätstheorie, Vol. 1. Die Spezielle Relativitätstheorie. Braunschweig: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorentz, Hendrik Anton. 1895. Versuch einer Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten Körpern. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorentz, Hendrik Antoon et al. 1923. The Principle of Relativity. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, Ernst. 1872. Die Geschichte und die Wurzel des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Arbeit. Prague: Calve.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1883. Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung. Historisch-kritisch dargestellt. Leipzig: F.A. Brock-haus.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1911. History and Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1960. The Science of Mechanics. A Critical and Historical Account of Its Development. LaSalle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Carl. 1870. Ueber die Prinzipien der Galilei-Newtonschen Theorie. Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, John. 1995. “Mach's Principle before Einstein.” In (Barbour and Pfister 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, Henri. 1898. “La Mesure du Temps.” Republished in Poincaré, Henri (1905). La Valeur de la Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1902. La Science et l'Hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1905. Science and Hypothesis. London: Walter Scott Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reissner, Hans. 1914. “Über die Relativität der Beschleunigungen in der Mechanik.” Physikalische Zeit-schrift 15: 371–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1915. “Über eine Möglichkeit die Gravitation als unmittelbare Folge der Relativität der Trägheit abzuleiten.” Physikalische Zeitschrift 16: 179–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemann, Bernhard. 1867. “Über die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu grunde liegen.” Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait. Peter G. 1883. “Note on Reference Frames.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Session 1883–84: 743–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, James. 1883. “On the law of inertia; the principle of chronometry; and the principle of absolute clinural rest, and of absolute rotation.” In Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Session 1883–84, 568 and 730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, William and Peter G. Tait. 1867. Elements of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Julian B. Barbour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Minnesota, USA

    Michel Janssen

  2. University of Pittsburgh, USA

    John D. Norton

  3. Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Germany

    Jürgen Renn

  4. Einstein Papers Project, Caltech, USA

    Tilman Sauer

  5. Boston University, USA

    John Stachel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barbour, J.B. (2007). Einstein and Mach's Principle. In: Janssen, M., Norton, J.D., Renn, J., Sauer, T., Stachel, J. (eds) The Genesis of General Relativity. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 250. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4000-9_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation