Advertisement

A MESH FREE METHOD BASED ON AN OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE AND THE MOVING LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATION

  • H. Dalayeli
  • H. Hashemolhosseini
  • M. Farzin
  • I. Pillinger
  • P. Hartley
Conference paper

Abstract

A mesh free method based on an optimization technique and the moving least-squares approximation is presented. In this method, the problem domain is modelled by a set of properly scattered points. Approximation functions are used to represent field variables and their derivatives. Like other mesh free methods, no mesh of elements is required. The other advantages are: prescribed displacements and tractions are imposed directly as a result of the minimization procedure, and there is no need to integrate the governing equations. The theory is developed for two-dimensional problems. As numerical examples of the proposed scheme, a cantilever beam and a Poisson equation are considered. The numerical results compare very well with the analytical solutions for these examples.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    B. Nayroles, G. Touzot and P. Villon (1992), Generalizing the finite element method: diffuse approximation and diffuse elements. Computational Mechanics, 10, pp. 307–318.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Belytschko, Y. Krongauz, D. Organ, M. Fleming and P. Krysl (1996), Meshless methods: an overview and recent developments. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 139, pp. 3–47.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.R. Liu (2002), Mesh Free Methods: Moving Beyond the Finite Element Method. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.R. Liu and K.Y. Yang (1998), A penalty method for enforcing essential boundary conditions in element free Galerkin method. In: The Proceedings of the 3rd HPC Asia’98, Singapore, pp. 715–721.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G.R. Liu and Y.T. Gu (2000), Coupling of element free Galerkin and hybrid boundary element methods using modified variational formulation. Computational Mechanics, 26, pp. 166–173.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Lancaster and K. Salkauskas (1981), Surfaces generated by moving least square methods. Mathematics of Computation, 37, pp. 141–158.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.P. Timoshenko and J.N. Goodier (1970), Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Dalayeli
    • 1
  • H. Hashemolhosseini
    • 2
  • M. Farzin
    • 3
  • I. Pillinger
    • 4
  • P. Hartley
    • 4
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentMalek-ashtar University of TechnologyShahin-shahrIran
  2. 2.Mining Engineering DepartmentIsfahan University of TechnologyIran
  3. 3.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentIsfahan University of TechnologyIran
  4. 4.Mechanical Engineering, School of EngineeringThe University of BirminghamEdgbastonUK

Personalised recommendations