Skip to main content

DESTRUCTIVE EXTENSION RULE IN PROPOSITION MODAL LOGIC K

  • Conference paper
Computational Methods

Abstract

Modal logics are good candidates for a formal theory of agents, the efficiency of reasoning method in modal logics is very important, because it determines whether or not the reasoning method can be used widely in the systems based on agent. Theorem proving based on the extension rule we presented is a new method. Firstly, this paper gives the version of non-clausal extension rule algorithm. Next, we present the extension rule in proposition modal logic K, namely we provide a new proof method for modal logics. And then we give the proof of its soundness and completeness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. H. Lin, J.G. Sun and Y.M. Zhang (2003), Theorem proving based on extension rule. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 31, pp. 11–21.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. H.J. Ohlbach (1988), A Resolution Calculus for Modal Logics, CADE’88, pp. 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.C. Fitting (1990), Destructive modal resolution. Journal of Logic and computation, 1, pp. 11–21, 83–97.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Fisher, C. Dixon and M. Peim (2001), Clausal temporal resolution. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 2, pp. 1–44.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Artale and E. Franconi (1998), A temporal description logic for reasoning about action and plans. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 9, pp. 463–506.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. U. Hustadt, C. Dixson, R.A. Schmidt and M. Fisher (2000), Normal Forms and Proofs in Combined Modal and Temporal Logics, FroCoS’2000, France, pp. 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.S. Liu, J.G. Sun and X.H. Liu (1998), Epistemic Logic (3): on semantic tableau proof procedure. Chinese Journal of Computers, 21, Suppl., pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.G. Sun, R.S. Liu, and R. Chen (1999), An extension on marked modal resolution. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2, pp. 113–119.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. R.A. Schmidt and U. Hustadt (2003), A Principle for Incorporating Axioms into the First-Order Translation of Modal Formulae, CADE’2003, USA, pp. 412–426.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, X., Sun, J. (2006). DESTRUCTIVE EXTENSION RULE IN PROPOSITION MODAL LOGIC K. In: LIU, G., TAN, V., HAN, X. (eds) Computational Methods. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3953-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3953-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3952-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3953-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics