Major computational advances in predicting the electronic and structural properties of matter come from two sources: improved performance of hardware and the creation of new algorithms, i.e., software. Improved hardware follows technical advances in computer design and electronic components. Such advances are frequently characterized by Moore’s Law, which states that computer power will double every 2 years or so. This law has held true for the past 20 or 30 years and most workers expect it to hold for the next decade, suggesting that such technical advances can be predicted.


Wave Function Valence Electron Real Space Electronic Scale Difference Expansion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    T.L. Beck, “Real-space mesh techniques in density functional theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 74, 1041, 2000.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J.R. Chelikowsky, “The pseudopotential-density functional method applied to nanostructures,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 33, R33, 2000.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    C.L. Bris (ed.), Handbook of Numerical Analysis (Devoted to Computational Chemistry), Volume X, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Lundqvist and N.H. March (eds.), Theory of the Inhomogeneous Electron Gas, Plenum, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    W. Kohn and L.J. Sham, “Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects,” Phys. Rev., 140, A1133, 1965.CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    W. Pickett, “Pseudopotential methods in condensed matter applications,” Comput. Phys. Rep., 9, 115, 1989.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.R. Chelikowsky and M.L. Cohen, “Ab initio pseudopotentials for semiconductors,” In: T.S. Moss and P.T. Landsberg (eds.), Handbook of Semiconductors, 2nd edn., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    N. Troullier and J.L. Martins, “Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations,” Phys. Rev. B, 43, 1993, 1991.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    J.R. Chelikowsky and S.G. Louie, “First principles linear combination of atomic orbitals method for the cohesive and structural properties of solids: application to diamond,” Phys. Rev. B, 29, 3470, 1984.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J.R. Chelikowsky and S.G. Louie (eds.), Quantum Theory of Materials, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    P. Pulay, “Ab initio calculation of force constants and equilibrium geometries,” Mol. Phys., 17, 197, 1969.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    B. Fornberg and D.M. Sloan, “A review of pseudospectral methods for solving partial differential equations,” Acta Numerica, 94, 203, 1994.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    L. Kleinman and D.M. Bylander, “Efficacious form for model pseudopotential,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 48, 1425, 1982.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J.R. Chelikowsky, N. Troullier, and Y. Saad, “The finite-difference-pseudopotential method: electronic structure calculations without a basis,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 72, 1240, 1994.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. Bernholc, “Computational materials science: the era of applied quantum mechanics,” Phys. Today, 52, 30, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Nakano, M.E. Bachlechner, R.K. Kalia, E. Lidorkis, P. Vashishta, G.Z. Voyladjis, T.J. Campbell, S. Ogata, and R Shimojo, “Multiscale simulation of nanosystems,” Comput. Sci. Eng., 3, 56, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • James R. Chelikowsky
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations