“Of all the courses we teach, none is more important than research methods” (Singleton and Strait, 1999, xv). Scientific theories were identified in the last chapter with scientific explanation. It was also noted that scholars can only have confidence in theories to the extent that these are logical, coherent, clear, and have been supported by evidence gathered using scientific methods. To be sure, philosophers of science, if not practicing scientists, now accept that scientific methods can neither prove nor disprove any theory (nor even any narrow hypothesis). Nevertheless, the application of scientific methods provides scientists with invaluable if imperfect evidence with which they can judge whether a theory seems to accord with reality. The key to science is the imperfect testing of theories against external reality (Polkinghorne, 1996, 18-19). Scientific theories guide scientists to ask certain research questions; 2scientific investigations in turn suggest changes to theories or perhaps even the development of new theories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2004). Classifying Method. In: Classifying Science. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3095-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3095-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3094-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3095-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive