This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abbs, P. (1982). English within the arts. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Allington, R. L. (Ed.). (2002). Big brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidence. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Au, K. H. (2001). Culturally-responsive instruction as a dimension of new literacies Reading Online, 5 (1), Available: http://www.readingonline.org/newliteracies/lit_index.asp?HREF=/newliteracies/zu/index.html
Au, K. H., & Raphael, T. E. (2000). Equity and literacy in the next millennium. Reading Research Quarterly, 35 (1), 170–188.
Barrs, M., Ellis, S., Hester, H., & Thomas, A. (1990). The primary language record. London: Centre for Language in Primary Education.
Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
Benton, M. (1983). Secondary worlds. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 16, 68–75.
Bird, T. (1990). The schoolteacher’s portfolio: An essay on possibilities. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook on teacher evaluation (pp. 241–256). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5 (1), 7–84.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Brady, L. (2001). Portfolios for assessment and reporting in New South Wales primary schools. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2 (2), 25–43.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Calfee, R., & Miller, R. G. (2005). Comprehending through composing: Reflections on reading assessment strategies. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 215–233). Center for Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA) and LEA.
California Learning Assessment System (1994). Elementary performance assessments: Integrated English language arts illustrative material. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
Coles, M., & Jenkins, R. (Eds.). (1998). Assessing reading, vol. 2: Changing practice in classrooms. London: Routledge.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
Cumming, J. J., & Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (Eds.). (2001). Examining the literacy-curriculum connection. Linguistics in Education, 11 (4), 295–312.
Eisner, E. (1985). The art of educational evaluation. A personal view. London: Falmer.
Eisner, E. (1999). The uses and limits of performance assessment. Kappan Online available at http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/keis9905.htm accessed May 30, 2005.
Eisner, E. (2004). What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education? International Journal of Education and the Arts, 5 (4), retrieved April 14, 2005 from http://ijea.asu.edu/v5n4/.
Falk, B. (1998). Using direct evidence to assess student progress: How the Primary Language Record supports teaching and learning. In C. Harrison & T. Salinger (Eds.), Assessing reading: Theory and practice (pp. 152–165). London: Routledge.
Farr, R., & Jongsma, E. (1997). Accountability through assessment and instruction. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 592–606). NJ: LEA.
Fehring, H. (Ed.). (2003). Literacy assessment: A collection of articles from the Australian Literacy Educators’ Association. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Flockton, L. C., & Crooks, T. J. (1996) National Education Monitoring Project [NEMP]: Reading and speaking. Dunedin, New Zealand: Educational Assessment Research Unit.
Flockton, L. C., & Crooks, T. J. (2001). Reading and speaking assessment results 2000: National monitoring report 19. Dunedin, New Zealand: Educational Assessment Research Unit. [Accessed November 2005 http://nemp.otago.ac.nz/read_speak/2000/silent_reading/]
Flockton, L. C., & Crooks, T. J. (2003). Listening and viewing assessment results 2002: National education monitoring report 25. Dunedin: Educational Assessment Research Unit. [Accessed November 2005 http://nemp.otago.ac.nz/listen_view/2002/index.htm]
Flood, J., Heath, S. B., & Lapp, D. (Eds.). (1997). Research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flood, J., Lapp, D., Squire, J. R., & Jensen, J. M. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Frey, N., & Hiebert, E. H. (2005). Teacher-based assessment of literacy learning. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J.R. Squire, & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed.). (pp. 608–618). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Galda, L., & Liang, L. A. (2005). Literature as experience or looking for facts: Stance in the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 38 (2), 268–275.
Gee, J. P. (2000). New people in new worlds: Networks, the new capitalism and schools. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 43–68). London: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2003). Opportunity to learn: A language-based perspective on assessment. Assessment in Education, 10 (1), 27–46.
Gilmore, A. (2002). Large-scale assessment and teachers’ assessment capacity: learning opportunities for teachers in the National Education Monitoring Project in New Zealand. Assessment in Education, 9, 343–361.
Greene, M. (1994). Postmodernism and the crisis of representation. English Education, 26 (4), 206–219.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Greene, M. (1997). Curriculum and consciousness. In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (pp. 137–149). New York: Routledge.
Hall, K. (2003a). Listening to Stephen read: Multiple perspectives on literacy. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hall, K. (2003b). Effective literacy teaching in the early years of school: A review of evidence. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & M. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 315–326). London: Sage.
Hall, K. (2004). Literacy and schooling: Towards renewal in primary education policy. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Hall, K., & Burke, W. (2003). Making formative assessment work: Effective practice in the primary classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hall, K., Collins, J., Benjamin, S., Sheehy, K., & Nind, M. (2004). SATurated models of pupildom: Assessment and inclusion/exclusion. British Educational Research Journal, 30 (6), 801–817.
Hall, K., & Harding, A. (2002). Level descriptions and teacher assessment: Towards a community of assessment practice. Educational Research, 40 (1), 1–16.
Hall, K., & Harding, A. (2003). A systematic review of effective literacy teaching in the 4–14 age range of mainstream schooling. In Research evidence in education library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students’ motivation for learning. In Research evidence in education library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
Harrison, B. (1983). Learning through writing. London: NFER.
Harrison, C., & Salinger, T. (Eds.). (1996). Assessing reading 1, theory and practice: International perspectives on reading assessment. London: Routledge.
Hoffman, J. V., Paris, S. G., Salas, R., Patterson, E., & Assaf, L. (2003). High-stakes assessment in the language arts: The piper plays, the players dance but who pays the price? In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed.). (pp. 619–639). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Holbrook, D. (1979). English for meaning. Windsor: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Ivinson, G., & Murphy, P. (2003). Boys don’t write romance: The construction of knowledge and social gender identities in English classrooms. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 11 (1), 89–112.
Jewitt, C. (2003). Rethinking Assessment: multimodality, literacy and computer-mediated learning. Assessment in Education, 10 (1), 83–102.
Johnson, D. (2003). Activity theory, mediated action and literacy: Assessing how children make meaning in multiple modes. Assessment in Education, 10 (1), 104–129.
Johnson, D., & Kress, G. (2003). Globalisation, literacy and society: Redesigning pedagogy and assessment. Assessment in Education, 10 (1), 5–14.
Johnston, P., & Costello, P. (2005). Principles for literacy assessment. Reading Research Quarterly, 40 (2), 256–267.
Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., & Harvey, A. (2003). Assessing multiliteracies and the new basics. Assessment in Education, 10 (1), 16–26.
Kenner, C., & Kress, G. (2003). The multisemiotic resources of biliterate children Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3 (2), 179–202.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
Langer, J. A. (1995). Envisioning literature: Literary understanding and literature instruction. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, culture and activity, 3, 149–164.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.
Luke, A., & Luke, C. (2001). Adolescence lost/childhood regained: On early intervention and the emergence of the techno-subject. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1 (1), 91–120.
Marshall, B. (2004). English assessed. London: National Association for the Teaching of English (NATE).
McMahon, S. I., Raphael, T. E., Goatley, V. J., & Pardo, L. S. (1997). The book club connection: Literacy learning and classroom talk. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
Moya, S. S., & O’Malley, M. (1994). A portfolio assessment model for ESL. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 13, 13–36.
Murphy, S. (2003). Finding literacy: A review of research on literacy assessment. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & M. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 369–378). London: Sage.
Murphy, S., Shannon, P., Johnston, P., & Hansen, J. (1998). Fragile evidence: a critique of reading assessment. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures Harvard. Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
Newfield, D., Andrew, D., Stein, P., & Maungedzo, R. (2003). “No number can describe how good it was”: assessment issues in the multimodal classroom. Assessment in Education, 10 (1), 61–81.
Paris, A., & Paris, S. (2003). Assessing narrative comprehension in young children Reading Research Quarterly, 38 (1), 36–76.
Paris, S., & Stahl, S. (Eds.). (2005). Children’s reading: Comprehension and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pearson, D. P., & Hamm, D. N. (2005). The assessment of reading comprehension: A review of practices – past, present and future. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading: Comprehension and assessment (pp. 13–70). Mahwah, NJ: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA), LEA,
Pinar, W. F. (Ed.). (1998). The passionate mind of Maxine Greene. London: Falmer.
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2004). More than words: Multimodal texts in the classroom London: QCA.
Rosenblatt, L. (1991). Literature SOS! Language Arts, 68, 444–448.
Rosenblatt, L. (1994). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Revised paperback edition Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Rosenblatt, L. (1995). Literature as exploration (5th ed.). New York: Modern Language Association.
Roser, N. L., & Martinez, M. G. (Eds.). (1995). Book talk and beyond: Children and teachers respond to literature. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
Salinger, T. (2002). Assessing the literacy of young children: The case for multiple forms of evidence. In S. B. Newman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 390–418). New York: Guilford Press.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture presidential address. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, April.
Street, B. (2004). Futures of the ethnography of literacy? Language and Education, 18 (4), 326–330.
Underwood, T. (1999). The portfolio project: A study of assessment, instruction and middle school reform. Urbana, IL: Council of Teachers of English.
Ushakova, S. (2001). Making literacy learning and teaching creative: Feedback portfolios. In G. Shiel & U. Ní Dhálaigh (Eds.), Other ways of seeing: Diversity in language and literacy (Vol. 1, pp. 51–61). Dublin: Reading Association of Ireland.
Valencia, S. W. (1998). Literacy portfolios in action. Texas: Harcourt Brace.
Valencia, S. W., & Place, N. A. (1994). Literacy portfolios for teaching, learning and accountability: The Bellevue Literacy Assessment Project. In S. W. Valencia, H. H. Hiebert, & P. P. Affleback (Eds.), Authentic reading assessment: Practices and possibilities (pp. 134–156). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Valencia, S. W., & Au, K. H. (1997). Portfolios across educational contexts: Issues of evaluation, teacher development, and system validity. Educational Assessment, 4 (1), 1–35.
Valencia, S. W., Hiebert, E. H., & Afflerback, P. P. (Eds.). (1994). Authentic reading assessment: Practices and possibilities. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Wiliam, D. (2002). What is wrong with our educational assessment and what can be done about it? Education Review, 15 (1), 57–62.
Wilson, J. (2003). Portfolios: Valuing the whole of children’s learning. In H. Fehring (Ed.), Literacy assessment: A collection of articles from the Australian Literacy Educators’ Association (pp. 84–89). International Reading Association Newark, DE.
Worthy, J., Hoffman, J. V., Roser, N. L., Rutherford, W., McKool, S., & Strecker, S. (1998). Teachers changing the system: Alternative assessment of first graders’ literacy. In M. Coles & R. Jenkins (Eds.), Assessing reading: Changing practice in classrooms (pp. 40–53). London: Routledge.
Wyatt-Smith, C. M., & Cumming, J. J. (2003). Curriculum literacies: Expanding domains of assessment. Assessment in Education, 10 (1), 47–59.
Wyatt-Smith, C., & Castleton, G. (2005). Examining how teachers judge student writing: An Australian case study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37 (2), 131–154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hall, K., Rix, J., Eyres, I. (2007). Assessing English within the Arts. In: Bresler, L. (eds) International Handbook of Research in Arts Education. Springer International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3052-9_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3052-9_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2998-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3052-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)