Motivational Implications of the Quality Teaching Model in New South Wales

  • Jennifer Archer
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 5)


The motivational implications of an educational reform in the Australian state of New South Wales are explored. The quality teaching model has been designed to improve teachers' pedagogical skills. The model is examined from the perspective of achievement-goal theory. I argue that the intention of the authors of the model is that its implementation will encourage students' adoption of a mastery achievement goal. However, there is a danger that the model may be less successful with those students who have been specifically targeted by the authors of the model, namely, under-achieving students from traditionally disadvantaged groups. I suggest that the model does not take into sufficient account the way in which students' social goals, or even a less conscious need to feel related to others, can work simultaneously with academic goals.


Educational Psychology Achievement Goal Quality Teaching Performance Goal Social Goal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ainley, M. D. (1993). Styles of engagement with learning: Multidimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology 85, 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology 84, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ames, C.&Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Student learning strategies and achievement motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology 18, 409–414.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, J. (1994). Achievement goals as a measure of motivation in university students.Contemporary Educational Psychology 84, 261–271.Google Scholar
  5. Archer, J. (2001). From motivation to self-regulation: Clustering students' motivational and cognitive characteristics, and exploring the impact of social interaction on learning. In C. Chin, F. Salili&Y. Hong (Eds.)Multiple Competencies and Self-regulated Learning: Implications for Multicultural Education(pp. 95–122). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Archer, J. (2004).Learning as a Means to Achieve Social Goals: A Motivational Analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, Victoria November 29 — December 2.Google Scholar
  7. Atkinson, J. (1964).An Introduction to Motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van NostrandGoogle Scholar
  8. Department of Education and Training (2003).Quality Teaching in NSW Public Schools: Discussion Paper. NSW Department of Education and Training, Professional Support and Curriculum Directorate, Sydney, NSW.Google Scholar
  9. Dowson, M. & McInerney, D. M. (2001). Psychological parameters of students' social and work avoidance goals: A qualitative investigation.Journal of Educational Psychology 93(1), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dowson, M.&McInerney, D. M. (2004). The development and validation of the goal orientation and learning strategies survey (GOALS-S).Educational and Psychological Measurement 64(2), 290–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning.American Psychologist 41, 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C.&Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence.Review of Educational Research 74(1), 59–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P.&Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment.Review of Educational Research 75(1), 27–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gore, J. M. (1993).The Struggle for Pedagogies: Critical and Feminist Discourses as Regimes of Truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K.E.&Elliot, A. E. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why?Educational Psychologist 33, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M.&Elliot, A. E. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade.Journal of Educational Psychology 92, 316–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hickey, D. T. (2003). Engaged participation versus marginal non participation: A stridently sociocultural approach to achievement motivation.The Elementary School Journal 103, 401–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hwang, A., Francesco, A. M.&Kessler, E. (2003). The relationship between individualism-collectivism, face, and feedback and learning processes in Hong Kong, Singapore, and the United States.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 34, 72–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ladwig, J. G. (2004).Modelling Pedagogy in Australian School Reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, Victoria, November 29 – December 2.Google Scholar
  20. Lamb, S., Rumberger, R., Jesson, D.&Teese, R. (2004).School Performance in Australia: Results from Analyses of School Effectiveness. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne. Report for the Victorian Department of Premier and Cabinet.Google Scholar
  21. McClelland, D., Atkinson, J., Clark, R.&Lowell, E. (1953).The Achievement Motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  22. McInerney, D. M. (2005). Educational psychology — theory, research, and teaching: A 25-year retrospective.Educational Psychology 25(6), 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meece, J. L.&Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students' achievement goals.Journal of Educational Psychology 85, 582–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MCEETYA (Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training, and Youth Affairs) (2005).National Report on Schooling 2005.Accessed 29/10/2006 at
  25. Mook, D. G. (1996).Motivation: The Organization of Action(2nd edn.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Newmann, F.M. &Associates (1996).Authentic Assessment: Restructuring Schools for Intellectual Quality. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M.&Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance.American Journal of Education 104(4), 280–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nicholls, J. G., Patashnick, M.&Nolen, S. B. (1985). Adolescents' theories of education.Journal of Educational Psychology 77, 683–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. OECD (2001).Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from PISA (Program for International Student Assessment 2000). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  30. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts.Journal of Educational Psychology 95(4), 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramsay, G. (2001).Quality Matters: Report of the Review of Teacher Education. Department of Education and Training, New South Wales. Accessed 29/10/2006 at teachrev/termsrefe.htmGoogle Scholar
  32. Salili, F. (1996). Accepting personal responsibility for learning. In D. A. Watkins&J. B. Biggs (Eds.)Chinese Learning: Cultural, Psychological, and Contextual Influences(pp. 85–106). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.Google Scholar
  33. Salili, F., Fu, H., Tong, Y.&Tabatabai, D. (2001). Motivation and self-regulation: A cross-cultural comparison of the effect of culture and context on learning on student motivation and self-regulation. In C. Chiu, F. Salili&Y. Hong (Eds.)Multiple Competencies and Self-regulated Learning: Implications for Multicultural Education(pp. 123–140). Connecticut, United States: Information Age.Google Scholar
  34. Stipek, D. (2002).Motivation to Learn: Integrating Theory and Practice(4th edition). Boston, MA: Allyn&Bacon.Google Scholar
  35. Summers, J. J. (2006). Effects of collaborative learning in math on sixth graders' individual goal orientations from a socioconstructivist perspective.The Elementary School Journal 106(3), 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Urdan, T. C.&Maehr, M. L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals.Review of Educational Research 65(3), 213–233.Google Scholar
  37. Wenger, E. (1998).Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wentzel, K. R. (1999). Social-motivational processes and interpersonal processes: Implications for understanding motivation at school.Journal of Educational Psychology 91, 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M.&Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment.Journal of Educational Psychology 96(2), 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wongsri, N. (2004).A Cross Cultural and Cross Disciplinary Comparison of Some Components of Self-regulated Learning. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Newcastle, Australia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Archer
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of NewcastleNew South WalesAustralia

Personalised recommendations