Skip to main content

Abstract

The ability of leaves, roots, and rhizomes to reduce the rate of predation on associated animals is as well studied as any topic having to do with seagrass beds, and is one of the major tenets of the seagrass ‘nursery role hypothesis’ (Beck et al., 2001). The past two decades have each produced detailed reviews of the effects of seagrasses on the outcome of predator–prey interactions (e.g. Heck and Orth, 1980; Orth et al., 1984; Heck and Crowder, 1991; Orth, 1992; Bartholomew et al., 2000; Hemminga and Duarte, 2000;Williams and Heck, 2001). In addition, Duffy and Hay (2001) have written a comprehensive overview of consumer–prey relationships in marine environments. Although the major conclusions of these reviews, that seagrass leaves, roots, and rhizomes reduce the rate of predation on both mobile and sessile animals, whether they are infaunal or epifaunal, have remained unchallenged, new issues have been raised. In this chapter, we first summarize the previous generalizations that continue to be supported by recent work, and then focus attention on results that challenge the conventional wisdom on predator–prey interactions in seagrass meadows. Throughout, we provide suggestions for studies that seem to be capable of resolving controversies or breaking new ground.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barnes PAG and Hickman CS (1999) Lucinid bivalves and marine angiosperms:Asearch for causal relationships. In:Walker DI and Wells FE (eds) The Seagrass Flora and Fauna of Rottnest Island, pp 215–238. Western Australia, Western Australian Museum, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew A, Diaz RJ and Cicchetti G (2000) New dimensionless indices of structural habitat complexity: Predicted and actual effects on a predator's foraging success. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 206: 45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck MW, Heck KL Jr, Able KW, Childers DL Eggleston DB, Gillanders BM, Halpern B, Hays CG, Hoshino K, Minello TJ, Orth RJ, Sheridan PF and Weinstein MP (2001) The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. Bioscience 51(8): 633–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Brooks RA Ellis WE (2003) Structural spacing and the determination of habitat complexity: The index of Bartholomew et al. (2000) index. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 248: 293–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertness MD, Garrity SD and Levings SC (1981) Predation pressure and gastropods foraging: A tropical–temperate comparison. Evolution 35: 995–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundon JA and Kennedy VS (1982) Refuges for infaunal bivalves from blue crab, Callinectes sapidus (Rathbun), predation in Chesapeake Bay. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 65: 67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bologna PAX and Heck KL Jr (1999) Differential predation and growth rates of bay scallops within a seagrass habitat. J Exp Mar Biol 239: 299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borum J (1987) Dynamics of epiphyton on eelgrass (Zostera marina) leaves: Relative roles of algal growth, herbivory and substratum turnover. Limnol Oceanogr 32: 986–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boström C and Bonsdorff E (1997) Community structure and spatial variation of benthic invertebrates associated with Zostera marina L. beds in the northern Baltic Sea. J Sea Res 37: 153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretsky SS (1978) Marine grass banks—a possible explanation for carbonate lenses, Pierre shale (Cretaceous) Colorado. J Sedimentary Petrol 48: 999–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricker SB, Clement CG, Pirhalla DE, Orlando SP and Farrow DRG (1999) National Estuarine Eutrophication assessment: Effects of Nutrient Enrichment in the Nation's Estuaries. NOAA, National Ocean Service, Special Projects Office and the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, p 71. Silver Spring, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Caine EA (1980) Ecology of two littoral species of caprellid amphipods (Crustacea) fromWashington, USA. Mar Biol 56: 327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge ML and McComb AJ (1984) The loss of seagrasses in Cockburn Sound, Western Australia. I. The time course and magnitude of seagrass decline in relation to industrial development. Aquat Bot 20: 229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson PR, Yarbro LA and Barber TR (1994) Relationship of sediment sulfide to mortality of Thalassia testudinum in Florida Bay. Bull Mar Sci 54(3): 733–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen LD and Heck KL Jr (1991) The interacting effects of siphon nipping and habitat on bivalve [Mercenaria mercenaria (L.)] growth in a subtropical seagrass (Halodule wrightii Uschers) meadow. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 45: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder LB and Cooper WE (1979) The effects of macrophyte removal on the feeding efficiency and growth of sunfishes: evidence from pond studies. In: Breck JE, Prentki RT and Loucks OL (eds) Aquatic Plants, Lake Management and Ecosystem Consequences of Lake Harvesting, pp 251–268. University of Wisconsin, Institute for Environmental Studies, Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK, Tegner MJ, Edwards PB and Riser KL (1998) Sliding baselines, ghosts, and reduced expectations in kelp forest communities. Ecol Appl 8: 309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog C (1994) Suffocation of a littoral Zostera bed by Enteromorpha radiata. Aquat Bot 27: 3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte CM (1995) Submerged aquatic vegetation in relation to different nutrient regimes. Ophelia 41: 37–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE and Hay ME (2001) Ecology and evolution of marine consumer–prey interactions. In: Bertness MD, Hay ME and Gaines SD (eds) Marine Community Ecology, pp 131–158. Sinauer Associates Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar GJ (1990) The influence of plant structure on species richness, biomass and secondary production of macrofaunal assemblages associated with Western Australian seagrass beds. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 37: 215–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar GJ and Shaw G (1995) The production and trophic ecology of shallow water fish assemblages in southern Australia. III. General relationships between sediments, seagrasses, invertebrates and fish. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 194: 107–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher CR (1990) Chemoautotrophic and methanotrophic symbioses in marine invertebrates. Aquat Sci 2: 339–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Forward RB Jr, DeVries MC, Rittschof D, Frankel DAZ, Bischoff JP, Fisher CM and Welch JM (1996) Effects of environmental cues on metamorphosis of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 131: 165–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesen WBJT, van Katwijk MM and den Hartog C (1990) Eelgrass condition and turbidity in the DutchWadden Sea. Aquat Bot 37: 71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotceitas V (1990a) Plant stem density as a cue in patch choice by foraging juvenile bluegill sunfish. Environ Biol Fishes 29: 227–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotceitas V (1990b) Foraging and predator avoidance: A test of patch choice model with juvenile bluegill sunfish. Oecologia 83: 346–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotceitas V and Colgan P (1989) Predator foraging success and predator–prey interactions: Quantitative test of the threshold hypothesis. Oecologia 80: 158–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauxwell J, Cebrian J, Furlong C and Valiela I (2001) Macroalgal canopies contribute to eelgrass (Zostera marina) decline in temperate estuarine ecosystems. Ecology 82: 1007–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck KL Jr and Orth RJ (1980) Seagrass habitats: The roles of habitat complexity, competition and predation in structuring associated fish and motile macroinvertebrate assemblages. In: Kennedy VS (ed) Estuarine Perspectives, pp 449–464. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck KL Jr and Thoman TA (1981) Experiments on predator– prey interactions in vegetated aquatic habitats. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 53: 125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck KL Jr and Wilson KA (1987) Predation rates on decapod crustaceans in latitudinally separated seagrass communities: A study of spatial and temporal variation using tethering techniques. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 197: 87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck KL Jr and Crowder LB (1991) Habitat structure and predator–prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems. In: Bell SS, McCoy ED and Mushinsky HR (eds) In Habitat Complexity: The Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space, pp 280–299. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck KL Jr and Coen LD (1995) Predation and the abundance of juvenile blue crabs: A comparison of selected east and Gulf coast (USA) studies. Bull Mar Sci 57(3): 877–883

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck KL Jr, Coen LD and Morgan SG (2001) Pre-and postsettlement factors as determinants of juvenile blue Callinectes sapidus abundance: Results from the north-central Gulf of Mexico. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 222: 163–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck KL Jr, Pennock J, Valentine J, CoenLand Sklenar SS (2000) Effects of nutrient enrichment and large predator removal on seagrass nursery habitats: An experimental assessment. Limnol Oceanogr 45: 1041–1057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heck KL Jr, Coen LD and Wilson DM (2002) Growth of northern [(Merceneria mercenaria (L.)] and Southern [M. campechensis (Gmelin)] quahogs: Influence of seagrasses and latitude. J Shellfish Res 21: 635–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck KL Jr, Hays G and Orth RJ (2003) Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253: 123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Heithaus MR, Dill LM, Marshall GJ and Buhleier B (2002) Habitat use and foraging behavior of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in a seagrass ecosystem. Mar Biol 140: 237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemminga MA and Duarte CM (2000) Seagrass Ecology. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, England)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovel KA and Lipcius RN (2002) Effects of seagrass habitat fragmentation on juvenile blue crab survival and abundance. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 271: 75–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard RK (1982) Impact of feeding activities of epibenthic amphipods on surface fouling of eelgrass leaves. Aquat Bot 14: 91–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard RK and Short FT (1986) Seagrass growth and survivorship under the influence of epiphyte grazers. Aquat Bot 24: 287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth R, Anderson D, Cloern J, Elfring C, Hopkinson C, Lapointe B, Malone T, Marcus N, McGlathery K, Sharpley A and Walker D (2000) Nutrient pollution of coastal rivers, bays and seas. Issues Ecol 7: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Irlandi EA (1994) Large-and small-scale effects of habitat structure on rates of predation: How percent coverage of seagrass affects rates of predation and siphon nipping on an infaunal bivalve. Oecologia 98: 176–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irlandi EA and Peterson CH (1991) Modifications of animal habitat by large plants: Mechanisms by which seagrasses influence clam growth. Oecologia 87: 307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irlandi EA and Mehlich ME (1996) The effect of tissue cropping disturbance by browsing fishes on growth of two species of suspension-feeding bivalves. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 197: 279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irlandi EA and Crawford MK (1997) Habitat linkages: The effects of intertidal saltmarshes and adjacent subtidal habitats on abundance, movement, and growth of an estuarine fish. Oecologia 110: 222–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irlandi EA, Ambrose WG and Orlando BA (1995) Landscape ecology and the marine environment: How spatial configuration of seagrass habitat influences growth and survival of the bay scallop. Oikos 72: 307–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JBC (1973) The ecology of mollusks of Thalassia communities, Jamaica West Indies. I. Distribution, environmental physiology, and ecology of common shallow–water species. Bull Mar Sci 23(2): 313–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JBC Kirby MX, Berger WH, Bjorndal KA, Botsford LW, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke RG, Erlandson J, Estes JA, Hughes TP, Kidwell S, Lange CB, Lenihan HS, Pandolfi JM, Peterson CH, Steneck RS, Tagner MJ and Warner RR (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293: 629–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James PL and Heck KL Jr (1994) The effects of habitat complexity and light intensity on ambush predation within simulated seagrass habitat. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 176: 187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins GP, May MHA, Wheatley MJ and Holloway MG (1997) Comparisons of fish assemblages associated with seagrass and adjacent unvegetated habitats of Port Phillips Bay and Corner Inlet, Australia, with emphasis on commercial species. Est Coast Shelf Sci 44: 569–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JI and Sayer CD (2003) Does the fish-invertebrateperiphyton cascade precipitate plant loss in shallow lakes? Ecology 84: 2155–2167

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin HJ, Nixon SW, Taylor DI, Granger SL and Buckley BA (1996) Responses of epiphytes on eelgrass, Zostera marina L., to separate and combined nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 52: 243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Lineham JE, Gregory RS and Schneider DC (2001) Predation risk of age-0 cod (Gadus) relative to depth and substrate in coastal waters. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 263: 25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main KL (1985) The influence of prey identity and size on selection of prey by two marine fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 88: 145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main KL (1987) Predator avoidance in seagrass meadows: Prey behavior, microhabitat selection, and cryptic coloration. Ecology 68: 170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila J and Heck KL Jr (in review) Does increased habitat structure provide increased refuge from predation?

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge BA and Lubchenko J (1981) Community organization in temperate and tropical rocky intertidal habitats: Prey refuges in relation to consumer pressure gradients. Ecol Monogr 51: 429–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheli F and Peterson CH (1999) Estuarine vegetated habitats as corridors for predator movements. Conserv Biol 13: 869–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakaoka M (2000) Nonlethal effects of predators on prey populations: Predator-mediated change in bivalve growth. Ecology 81: 1031–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (2000) Clean Coastal Waters: Understanding and Reducing the Effects of Nutrient Pollution. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Neckles HA, Wetzel RL and Orth RJ (1993) Relative effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on epiphytonmacrophyte (Zostera marina) dynamics. Oecologia 93: 285–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson WG (1979) Experimental studies of selective predation on amphipods: Consequences for amphipod distribution and abundance. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 38: 225–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson WG and Bonsdorff E (1990) Fish predation and habitat complexity: Are complexity thresholds real? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 141: 183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neundorfer JV and Kemp WM (1993) Nitrogen versus phosphorus enrichment of brackish waters: Responses of the submersed plant Potamogeton perfoliatus and its associated algal community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 94: 71–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orth RJ (1992) A perspective on plant-animal interactions ins seagrasses: Physical and biological determinants influencing plant and animal abundance. In: John DM, Hawkins SJ and Price JH (eds) Plant–Animal Interactions in the Marine Benthos. Systematics Association Special, Vol 46, pp 147–164. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth RJ and Heck KL Jr. (1980) Structural components of eelgrass meadows in the lower Chesapeake Bay – fishes. Estuaries 3: 278–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth RJ and Moore KA (1983) Chesapeake Bay: An unprecedented decline in submerged aquatic vegetation. Science 222: 51–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orth RJ and van Montfrans J (2002) Habitat quality and prey size as determinants of survival in post-larval and early juvenile instars of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 231: 205–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth RJ, Heck KL Jr and van Montfrans J (1984) Faunal Communities in Seagrass beds: A review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator–prey relationships. Estuaries 7: 339–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson CH and Quammen ML (1982) Siphon nipping: Its importance to small fishes and its impact on growth of the bivalve Protothaca staminea (Conrad). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 63: 249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson BJ and Heck KL Jr (2001) Positive interactions between suspension-feeding bivalves and seagrass—a facultative mutualism. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 213: 143–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson CH and Lipcius RN (2003) Conceptual progress towards predicting quantitative ecosystem benefits of ecological restorations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 264: 297–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson BJ, Thompson KR, Cowan JH and Heck KL Jr (2001) Comparison of predation pressure in temperate and subtropical seagrass habitats based on chronographic tethering. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 224: 77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan BA, Goldberg R, Bejda AJ, Pereira J, Hagan S, Clark P, Studholme AL, Calabrese A and Able KW (2000) Estuarine and habitat-related differences in growth rates of young of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) and tautog (Tautoga onitis) in three northeastern US estuaries. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 247: 1–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips GL, Eminson D and Moss B (1978) A mechanism to account for macrophytes decline in progressively eutrophicated freshwaters. Aquat Bot 4: 103–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillippart CJM (1995) Effect of periphyton grazing by Hydrobia ulvae on the growth of Zostera noltii on a tidal flat in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Mar Biol 122: 431–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reusch TBH and Williams SL (1998) Variable responses of native eelgrass Zostera marina to a non-indigenous bivalve Musculista senhousia. Oecologia 113: 428–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reusch TBH, ChapmanAROand Gröger JP (1994) Blue mussels Mytilus edulis do not interfere with eelgrass Zostera marina but fertilize shoot growth through biodeposition. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 108: 265–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AI and Mann KH (1982) Population dynamics and life history adaptations of Littorina neglecta (Bean) in an eelgrass meadow(Zostera marina) in Nova Scotia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 63: 151–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryer CH (1988) Pipefish foraging: Effects of fish size, prey size and altered habitat complexity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 48: 37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd SA, McComb AJ, Bulthuis DA, Neverauskas V, Steffensen DA and West DA (1989) Decline of seagrasses. In: Larkum AWD, McComb AJ and Shepherd SA (eds) Biology of Seagrasses, pp 346–393. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Short FT, Burdick DM and Kaldy JE III (1995) Mesocosm experiments quantify the effects of eutrophication on eelgrass, Zostera marina. Limnol Oceanogr 40: 740–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer P, Mattila J and Heck KL Jr (2000) The effects of vegetation density on the relative growth rates, diet, and foraging behavior of pinfish, Lagodon rhomboides (L.), in Big Lagoon, Florida. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 244: 67–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowicz JJ and Hay ME (2000) Geographic variation in camouflage specialization by a decorator crab. AmNat 156: 59–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley SM (1970) Relation of shell form to life habits in the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geological Soc Am Mem 125: 296

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner A (1982) The influence of benthic macrophytes on the foraging behavior of pinfish (Lagodon rhomboides) (Linnaeus). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 58: 271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stunz GW, Minello TJ and Lenin PS (2002) Growth of newly settled red drum Sciaenops ocellatus in different estuarine habitat types. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 238: 227–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasko DA, Dawes CJ and Hall MO (1996) The effects of anthropogenic nutrient enrichment on turtlegrass (Thalassia testudinum) in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Estuaries 19: 448–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine JF and Heck KL Jr (2005) Interaction strength at the coral-reef seagrass interface: Has overfishing diminished the importance of seagrass production for coral reef food webs? Coral Reefs 24: 209–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Montfrans J, Orth RJ and Vay SA (1982) Preliminary studies of grazing by Bittium varium on eelgrass periphyton. Aquat Bot 14: 75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij GJ (1987) Evolution and Escalation, p 527. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams SL and Ruckelshaus MH (1993) Effects of nitrogen availability and herbivory on eelgrass (Zostera marina) and epiphytes. Ecology 74: 904–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams S and Heck KL Jr (2001) Seagrass community ecology. In: Bertness MD, Gaines S and Hay ME (eds) Marine Community Ecology, pp 317–337. Sinauer Associates, Inc. (Sunderland, Massachusetts)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyda JC, Deegan LA, Hughes JE and Weaver MJ (2002) The response of fishes to submerged aquatic vegetation complexity in two ecoregions of the mid-Atlantic Bight: Buzzards Bay and Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 25(1): 86–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heck Jr., K.L., Orth, R.J. (2007). Predation in Seagrass Beds. In: SEAGRASSES: BIOLOGY, ECOLOGYAND CONSERVATION. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2983-7_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics